A Study of Large Language Models for Patient Information Extraction: Model Architecture, Fine-Tuning Strategy, and Multi-task Instruction Tuning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04753v1
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 02:07:40 GMT
- Title: A Study of Large Language Models for Patient Information Extraction: Model Architecture, Fine-Tuning Strategy, and Multi-task Instruction Tuning
- Authors: Cheng Peng, Xinyu Dong, Mengxian Lyu, Daniel Paredes, Yaoyun Zhang, Yonghui Wu,
- Abstract summary: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized many NLP tasks in the clinical domain.<n>This study focuses on LLM architectures, fine-tuning strategies, and multi-task instruction tuning techniques for developing robust and generalizable patient information extraction systems.
- Score: 10.007149687726773
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Natural language processing (NLP) is a key technology to extract important patient information from clinical narratives to support healthcare applications. The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized many NLP tasks in the clinical domain, yet their optimal use in patient information extraction tasks requires further exploration. This study examines LLMs' effectiveness in patient information extraction, focusing on LLM architectures, fine-tuning strategies, and multi-task instruction tuning techniques for developing robust and generalizable patient information extraction systems. This study aims to explore key concepts of using LLMs for clinical concept and relation extraction tasks, including: (1) encoder-only or decoder-only LLMs, (2) prompt-based parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) algorithms, and (3) multi-task instruction tuning on few-shot learning performance. We benchmarked a suite of LLMs, including encoder-based LLMs (BERT, GatorTron) and decoder-based LLMs (GatorTronGPT, Llama 3.1, GatorTronLlama), across five datasets. We compared traditional full-size fine-tuning and prompt-based PEFT. We explored a multi-task instruction tuning framework that combines both tasks across four datasets to evaluate the zero-shot and few-shot learning performance using the leave-one-dataset-out strategy.
Related papers
- An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniques [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance natural language processing with their ability to generate human-like text.<n>We present a systematic evaluation of six LLMs across four datasets: CNN/Daily Mail and NewsRoom (news), SAMSum (dialog), and ArXiv (scientific)<n>Our study evaluates the performance using the ROUGE and BERTScore metrics.<n>For Long documents, introduce a sentence-based chunking strategy that enables LLMs with shorter context windows to summarize extended inputs in multiple stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T15:34:05Z) - Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multi-Language Software Vulnerability Detection [15.026084450436976]
We present a study evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on the software vulnerability detection task.<n>We have compiled a dataset comprising 8,260 vulnerable functions in Python, 7,505 in Java, and 28,983 in JavaScript.<n>These LLMs are benchmarked against five fine-tuned small language models and two open-source static application security testing tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T11:56:00Z) - From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learning [153.8110509961261]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been employed for generating entirely new data instances and providing more cost-effective annotations.<n>This survey aims to serve as an up-to-date resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to gain an intuitive understanding of LLM-based AL techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T12:58:17Z) - Empowering Large Language Models in Wireless Communication: A Novel Dataset and Fine-Tuning Framework [81.29965270493238]
We develop a specialized dataset aimed at enhancing the evaluation and fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) for wireless communication applications.<n>The dataset includes a diverse set of multi-hop questions, including true/false and multiple-choice types, spanning varying difficulty levels from easy to hard.<n>We introduce a Pointwise V-Information (PVI) based fine-tuning method, providing a detailed theoretical analysis and justification for its use in quantifying the information content of training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-16T16:19:53Z) - Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models [22.676688441884465]
Fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) on a diverse array of tasks has become a common approach for building models.
This study investigates the task-specific information encoded in pre-trained LLMs and the effects of instruction tuning on their representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T23:38:28Z) - Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - 60 Data Points are Sufficient to Fine-Tune LLMs for Question-Answering [50.12622877002846]
Large language models (LLMs) encode extensive world knowledge through pre-training on massive datasets, which can be fine-tuned for the question-answering (QA) task.<n>We categorize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data based on the extent of knowledge memorized by the pretrained LLMs.<n>Our experiments show that as few as 60 data points during the SFT stage can activate the knowledge encoded during pre-training, enabling LLMs to perform the QA task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T07:38:38Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Large Language Models as Data Preprocessors [9.99065004972981]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in artificial intelligence.
This study explores their potential in data preprocessing, a critical stage in data mining and analytics applications.
We propose an LLM-based framework for data preprocessing, which integrates cutting-edge prompt engineering techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T23:28:43Z) - Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models [11.845239346943067]
parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is a promising approach to efficiently specialize large language models (LLMs) to task-specific data.<n>Our study highlights the potential for tuning larger LLMs and significant reductions in memory usage by combining PEFT with quantization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T04:31:06Z) - Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Small Language Models in
Knowledge-Intensive Tasks [90.11273439036455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in knowledge-intensive reasoning tasks.
We propose Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation (KARD), a novel method that fine-tunes small LMs to generate rationales from LLMs with augmented knowledge retrieved from an external knowledge base.
We empirically show that KARD significantly improves the performance of small T5 and GPT models on the challenging knowledge-intensive reasoning datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-28T13:00:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.