Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06921v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:33:59 GMT
• Title: Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities
• Authors: Safayat Bin Hakim, Muhammad Adil, Alvaro Velasquez, Shouhuai Xu, Houbing Herbert Song,
• Abstract summary: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) AI has emerged with the potential to revolutionize cybersecurity AI.<n>We systematically characterize this field by analyzing 127 publications spanning 2019-July 2025.<n>We show that causal reasoning integration is the most transformative advancement, enabling proactive defense beyond correlation-based approaches.
• Score: 13.175694396580184
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches in cybersecurity exhibit fundamental limitations: inadequate conceptual grounding leading to non-robustness against novel attacks; limited instructibility impeding analyst-guided adaptation; and misalignment with cybersecurity objectives. Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) AI has emerged with the potential to revolutionize cybersecurity AI. However, there is no systematic understanding of this emerging approach. These hybrid systems address critical cybersecurity challenges by combining neural pattern recognition with symbolic reasoning, enabling enhanced threat understanding while introducing concerning autonomous offensive capabilities that reshape threat landscapes. In this survey, we systematically characterize this field by analyzing 127 publications spanning 2019-July 2025. We introduce a Grounding-Instructibility-Alignment (G-I-A) framework to evaluate these systems, focusing on both cyber defense and cyber offense across network security, malware analysis, and cyber operations. Our analysis shows advantages of multi-agent NeSy architectures and identifies critical implementation challenges including standardization gaps, computational complexity, and human-AI collaboration requirements that constrain deployment. We show that causal reasoning integration is the most transformative advancement, enabling proactive defense beyond correlation-based approaches. Our findings highlight dual-use implications where autonomous systems demonstrate substantial capabilities in zero-day exploitation while achieving significant cost reductions, altering threat dynamics. We provide insights and future research directions, emphasizing the urgent need for community-driven standardization frameworks and responsible development practices that ensure advancement serves defensive cybersecurity objectives while maintaining societal alignment.

Related papers

• Secure Semantic Communications via AI Defenses: Fundamentals, Solutions, and Future Directions [44.71660423560587]
  This survey provides a defense-centered and system-oriented synthesis of security in SemCom via AI defense.<n>We present a structured taxonomy of defense strategies organized by where semantic integrity can be compromised in SemCom systems.<n>We also examine security utility operating envelopes that capture tradeoffs among semantic fidelity, robustness, latency, and energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T17:28:07Z)
• ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots [48.89876809734855]
  We present the first systematic study of adversarial safety attacks on embodied AI systems.<n>We show attack success rates exceeding 50% across all safety categories.<n>Results expose a previously underexplored but highly consequential attack surface in embodied AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T15:00:28Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Autonomous AI-based Cybersecurity Framework for Critical Infrastructure: Real-Time Threat Mitigation [1.4999444543328293]
  We propose a hybrid AI-driven cybersecurity framework to enhance real-time vulnerability detection, threat modelling, and automated remediation.<n>Our findings provide actionable insights to strengthen the security and resilience of critical infrastructure systems against emerging cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T04:17:29Z)
• Transforming Cyber Defense: Harnessing Agentic and Frontier AI for Proactive, Ethical Threat Intelligence [0.0]
  This manuscript explores how the convergence of agentic AI and Frontier AI is transforming cybersecurity.<n>We examine the roles of real time monitoring, automated incident response, and perpetual learning in forging a resilient, dynamic defense ecosystem.<n>Our vision is to harmonize technological innovation with unwavering ethical oversight, ensuring that future AI driven security solutions uphold core human values of fairness, transparency, and accountability while effectively countering emerging cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T20:23:35Z)
• Considerations Influencing Offense-Defense Dynamics From Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  AI can enhance defensive capabilities but also presents avenues for malicious exploitation and large-scale societal harm.<n>This paper proposes a taxonomy to map and examine the key factors that influence whether AI systems predominantly pose threats or offer protective benefits to society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T10:05:53Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• A Synergistic Approach In Network Intrusion Detection By Neurosymbolic AI [6.315966022962632]
  This paper explores the potential of incorporating Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (NSAI) into Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) NSAI combines deep learning's data-driven strengths with symbolic AI's logical reasoning to tackle the dynamic challenges in cybersecurity. The inclusion of NSAI in NIDS marks potential advancements in both the detection and interpretation of intricate network threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T02:24:01Z)
• A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity [14.648580959079787]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to create machine learning models that can provide clear and interpretable explanations for their decisions and actions. In the field of network cybersecurity, XAI has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach network security by enabling us to better understand the behavior of cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T22:54:18Z)
• The Feasibility and Inevitability of Stealth Attacks [63.14766152741211]
  We study new adversarial perturbations that enable an attacker to gain control over decisions in generic Artificial Intelligence systems. In contrast to adversarial data modification, the attack mechanism we consider here involves alterations to the AI system itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T10:50:07Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.