Beyond Rebalancing: Benchmarking Binary Classifiers Under Class Imbalance Without Rebalancing Techniques

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07605v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 11:28:34 GMT
• Title: Beyond Rebalancing: Benchmarking Binary Classifiers Under Class Imbalance Without Rebalancing Techniques
• Authors: Ali Nawaz, Amir Ahmad, Shehroz S. Khan,
• Abstract summary: Class imbalance poses a significant challenge to supervised classification, particularly in critical domains like medical diagnostics and anomaly detection.<n>We systematically evaluate the robustness of a diverse set of binary classifiers across both real-world and synthetic datasets.<n>Results confirm that classification becomes more difficult as data complexity increases and the minority class size decreases.
• Score: 3.7660066212240744
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Class imbalance poses a significant challenge to supervised classification, particularly in critical domains like medical diagnostics and anomaly detection where minority class instances are rare. While numerous studies have explored rebalancing techniques to address this issue, less attention has been given to evaluating the performance of binary classifiers under imbalance when no such techniques are applied. Therefore, the goal of this study is to assess the performance of binary classifiers "as-is", without performing any explicit rebalancing. Specifically, we systematically evaluate the robustness of a diverse set of binary classifiers across both real-world and synthetic datasets, under progressively reduced minority class sizes, using one-shot and few-shot scenarios as baselines. Our approach also explores varying data complexities through synthetic decision boundary generation to simulate real-world conditions. In addition to standard classifiers, we include experiments using undersampling, oversampling strategies, and one-class classification (OCC) methods to examine their behavior under severe imbalance. The results confirm that classification becomes more difficult as data complexity increases and the minority class size decreases. While traditional classifiers deteriorate under extreme imbalance, advanced models like TabPFN and boosting-based ensembles retain relatively higher performance and better generalization compared to traditional classifiers. Visual interpretability and evaluation metrics further validate these findings. Our work offers valuable guidance on model selection for imbalanced learning, providing insights into classifier robustness without dependence on explicit rebalancing techniques.

Related papers

• Kernel-Free Universum Quadratic Surface Twin Support Vector Machines for Imbalanced Data [1.8990839669542954]
  Binary classification tasks with imbalanced classes pose significant challenges in machine learning.<n>We introduce a novel approach to tackle this issue by leveraging Universum points to support the minority class within quadratic twin support vector machine models.<n>By incorporating Universum points, our approach enhances classification accuracy and generalization performance on imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T19:57:59Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Deep Imbalanced Regression via Hierarchical Classification Adjustment [50.19438850112964]
  Regression tasks in computer vision are often formulated into classification by quantizing the target space into classes. The majority of training samples lie in a head range of target values, while a minority of samples span a usually larger tail range. We propose to construct hierarchical classifiers for solving imbalanced regression tasks. Our novel hierarchical classification adjustment (HCA) for imbalanced regression shows superior results on three diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T04:54:39Z)
• A Unified Generalization Analysis of Re-Weighting and Logit-Adjustment for Imbalanced Learning [129.63326990812234]
  We propose a technique named data-dependent contraction to capture how modified losses handle different classes. On top of this technique, a fine-grained generalization bound is established for imbalanced learning, which helps reveal the mystery of re-weighting and logit-adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T09:15:08Z)
• Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Loss [8.934943507699131]
  Complementary-label learning (CLL) is widely used in weakly supervised classification. It faces a significant challenge in real-world datasets when confronted with class-imbalanced training samples. We propose a novel problem setting that enables learning from class-imbalanced complementary labels for multi-class classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T16:02:42Z)
• Imbalanced Classification via a Tabular Translation GAN [4.864819846886142]
  We present a model based on Generative Adversarial Networks which uses additional regularization losses to map majority samples to corresponding synthetic minority samples. We show that the proposed method improves average precision when compared to alternative re-weighting and oversampling techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-19T06:02:53Z)
• Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learning [64.96088324684683]
  We propose textitPrototypical, which does not require fitting additional parameters given the embedding network. Prototypical produces balanced and comparable predictions for all classes even though the training set is class-imbalanced. We test our method on CIFAR-10LT, CIFAR-100LT and Webvision datasets, observing that Prototypical obtains substaintial improvements compared with state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T01:55:01Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Joint Impact of Feature Selection and Data Resampling on Imbalance Classification [4.506770920842088]
  This study focuses on the synergy between feature selection and data resampling for imbalance classification. We conduct a large amount of experiments on 52 publicly available datasets, using 9 feature selection methods, 6 resampling approaches for class imbalance learning, and 3 well-known classification algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T06:01:51Z)
• Long-Tailed Recognition Using Class-Balanced Experts [128.73438243408393]
  We propose an ensemble of class-balanced experts that combines the strength of diverse classifiers. Our ensemble of class-balanced experts reaches results close to state-of-the-art and an extended ensemble establishes a new state-of-the-art on two benchmarks for long-tailed recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T20:57:44Z)
• M2m: Imbalanced Classification via Major-to-minor Translation [79.09018382489506]
  In most real-world scenarios, labeled training datasets are highly class-imbalanced, where deep neural networks suffer from generalizing to a balanced testing criterion. In this paper, we explore a novel yet simple way to alleviate this issue by augmenting less-frequent classes via translating samples from more-frequent classes. Our experimental results on a variety of class-imbalanced datasets show that the proposed method improves the generalization on minority classes significantly compared to other existing re-sampling or re-weighting methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T13:21:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.