Modelling Analogies and Analogical Reasoning: Connecting Cognitive Science Theory and NLP Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09381v2
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:52:31 GMT
- Title: Modelling Analogies and Analogical Reasoning: Connecting Cognitive Science Theory and NLP Research
- Authors: Molly R Petersen, Claire E Stevenson, Lonneke van der Plas,
- Abstract summary: Analogical reasoning is an essential aspect of human cognition.<n>We show how these notions are relevant for several major challenges in NLP research, not directly related to analogy solving.<n>This may guide researchers to better optimize relational understanding in text, as opposed to relying heavily to entity-level similarity.
- Score: 1.7927296042375183
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Analogical reasoning is an essential aspect of human cognition. In this paper, we summarize key theory about the processes underlying analogical reasoning from the cognitive science literature and relate it to current research in natural language processing. While these processes can be easily linked to concepts in NLP, they are generally not viewed through a cognitive lens. Furthermore, we show how these notions are relevant for several major challenges in NLP research, not directly related to analogy solving. This may guide researchers to better optimize relational understanding in text, as opposed to relying heavily on entity-level similarity.
Related papers
- Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs [63.12951576410617]
Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems yet fail on simpler variants, suggesting they achieve correct outputs through mechanisms fundamentally different from human reasoning.<n>We synthesize cognitive science research into a taxonomy of 28 cognitive elements spanning reasoning invariants, meta-cognitive controls, representations for organizing reasoning & knowledge, and transformation operations.<n>We develop test-time reasoning guidance that automatically scaffold successful structures, improving performance by up to 66.7% on complex problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T18:59:00Z) - LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [74.0242521818214]
This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning.<n>We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines.<n>We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z) - LLMs as Models for Analogical Reasoning [14.412456982731467]
Analogical reasoning is fundamental to human cognition and learning.<n>Recent studies have shown that large language models can sometimes match humans in analogical reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T20:07:37Z) - From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for
Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions.
Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z) - ARN: Analogical Reasoning on Narratives [13.707344123755126]
We develop a framework that operationalizes dominant theories of analogy, using narrative elements to create surface and system mappings.
We show that while all LLMs can largely recognize near analogies, even the largest ones struggle with far analogies in a zero-shot setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T08:58:29Z) - A Diachronic Analysis of Paradigm Shifts in NLP Research: When, How, and
Why? [84.46288849132634]
We propose a systematic framework for analyzing the evolution of research topics in a scientific field using causal discovery and inference techniques.
We define three variables to encompass diverse facets of the evolution of research topics within NLP.
We utilize a causal discovery algorithm to unveil the causal connections among these variables using observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T11:08:00Z) - Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable
Scientific Analogies after Structure Abduction [46.2032673640788]
The vital role of analogical reasoning in human cognition allows us to grasp novel concepts by linking them with familiar ones through shared relational structures.
This work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook the structures that underpin these analogies.
This paper introduces a task of analogical structure abduction, grounded in cognitive psychology, designed to abduce structures that form an analogy between two systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T03:04:06Z) - ANALOGYKB: Unlocking Analogical Reasoning of Language Models with A Million-scale Knowledge Base [51.777618249271725]
ANALOGYKB is a million-scale analogy knowledge base derived from existing knowledge graphs (KGs)
It identifies two types of analogies from the KGs: 1) analogies of the same relations, which can be directly extracted from the KGs, and 2) analogies of analogous relations, which are identified with a selection and filtering pipeline enabled by large language models (LLMs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T09:03:01Z) - Investigating the Role of Centering Theory in the Context of Neural
Coreference Resolution Systems [71.57556446474486]
We investigate the connection between centering theory and modern coreference resolution systems.
We show that high-quality neural coreference resolvers may not benefit much from explicitly modeling centering ideas.
We formulate a version of CT that also models recency and show that it captures coreference information better compared to vanilla CT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T12:55:26Z) - Understanding Narratives through Dimensions of Analogy [17.68704739786042]
Analogical reasoning is a powerful tool that enables humans to connect two situations, and to generalize their knowledge from familiar to novel situations.
Modern scalable AI techniques with the potential to reason by analogy have been only applied to the special case of proportional analogy.
In this paper, we aim to bridge the gap by: 1) formalizing six dimensions of analogy based on mature insights from Cognitive Science research, 2) annotating a corpus of fables with each of these dimensions, and 3) defining four tasks with increasing complexity that enable scalable evaluation of AI techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-14T20:56:26Z) - Neural Analogical Matching [8.716086137563243]
The importance of analogy to humans has made it an active area of research in the broader field of artificial intelligence.
We introduce the Analogical Matching Network, a neural architecture that learns to produce analogies between structured, symbolic representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-07T17:50:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.