The Prompt Engineering Report Distilled: Quick Start Guide for Life Sciences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11295v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:39:35 GMT
• Title: The Prompt Engineering Report Distilled: Quick Start Guide for Life Sciences
• Authors: Valentin Romanov, Steven A Niederer,
• Abstract summary: This report focuses on 6 core prompt techniques: zero-shot, few-shot approaches, thought generation, ensembling, self-criticism, and decomposition.<n>We provide detailed recommendations for how prompts should and shouldn't be structured.<n>We examine the effectiveness of Deep Research tools across OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and Perplexity platforms.
• Score: 0.016851255229980582
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Developing effective prompts demands significant cognitive investment to generate reliable, high-quality responses from Large Language Models (LLMs). By deploying case-specific prompt engineering techniques that streamline frequently performed life sciences workflows, researchers could achieve substantial efficiency gains that far exceed the initial time investment required to master these techniques. The Prompt Report published in 2025 outlined 58 different text-based prompt engineering techniques, highlighting the numerous ways prompts could be constructed. To provide actionable guidelines and reduce the friction of navigating these various approaches, we distil this report to focus on 6 core techniques: zero-shot, few-shot approaches, thought generation, ensembling, self-criticism, and decomposition. We breakdown the significance of each approach and ground it in use cases relevant to life sciences, from literature summarization and data extraction to editorial tasks. We provide detailed recommendations for how prompts should and shouldn't be structured, addressing common pitfalls including multi-turn conversation degradation, hallucinations, and distinctions between reasoning and non-reasoning models. We examine context window limitations, agentic tools like Claude Code, while analyzing the effectiveness of Deep Research tools across OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and Perplexity platforms, discussing current limitations. We demonstrate how prompt engineering can augment rather than replace existing established individual practices around data processing and document editing. Our aim is to provide actionable guidance on core prompt engineering principles, and to facilitate the transition from opportunistic prompting to an effective, low-friction systematic practice that contributes to higher quality research.

Related papers

• Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini: Case Studies and Common Techniques [105.15622072347811]
  Large language models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for accelerating scientific research.<n>We present a collection of case studies demonstrating how researchers have successfully collaborated with advanced AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T18:56:17Z)
• Deep Research: A Systematic Survey [118.82795024422722]
  Deep Research (DR) aims to combine the reasoning capabilities of large language models with external tools, such as search engines.<n>This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic overview of deep research systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T15:28:28Z)
• Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning [53.85659415230589]
  This paper systematically reviews widely adoptedReinforcement learning techniques.<n>We present clear guidelines for selecting RL techniques tailored to specific setups.<n>We also reveal that a minimalist combination of two techniques can unlock the learning capability of critic-free policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:39:45Z)
• Which Prompting Technique Should I Use? An Empirical Investigation of Prompting Techniques for Software Engineering Tasks [6.508214641182163]
  We present a systematic evaluation of 14 established prompt techniques across 10 software engineering (SE) tasks using four Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>As identified in the prior literature, the selected prompting techniques span six core dimensions (Zero-Shot, Few-Shot, Thought Generation, Ensembling, Self-Criticism, and Decomposition)<n>Our results show which prompting techniques are most effective for SE tasks requiring complex logic and intensive reasoning versus those that rely more on contextual understanding and example-driven scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T21:58:44Z)
• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.<n>This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• The Prompt Canvas: A Literature-Based Practitioner Guide for Creating Effective Prompts in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper argues for the creation of an overarching framework that synthesizes existing methodologies into a cohesive overview for practitioners.<n>We present the Prompt Canvas, a structured framework resulting from an extensive literature review on prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:35:18Z)
• PROMPTHEUS: A Human-Centered Pipeline to Streamline SLRs with LLMs [0.0]
  PROMPTHEUS is an AI-driven pipeline solution for Systematic Literature Reviews. It automates key stages of the SLR process, including systematic search, data extraction, topic modeling, and summarization. It achieves high precision, provides coherent topic organization, and reduces review time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T13:05:33Z)
• The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniques [42.618971816813385]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence systems are increasingly being deployed across diverse industries and research domains.<n> prompt engineering suffers from conflicting terminology and a fragmented ontological understanding.<n>We establish a structured understanding of prompt engineering by assembling a taxonomy of prompting techniques and analyzing their applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T18:10:11Z)
• Efficient Prompting Methods for Large Language Models: A Survey [50.82812214830023]
  Efficient Prompting Methods have attracted a wide range of attention.<n>We discuss Automatic Prompt Engineering for different prompt components and Prompt Compression in continuous and discrete spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T12:19:08Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications [11.568575664316143]
  This paper provides a structured overview of recent advancements in prompt engineering, categorized by application area.<n>We provide a summary detailing the prompting methodology, its applications, the models involved, and the datasets utilized.<n>This systematic analysis enables a better understanding of this rapidly developing field and facilitates future research by illuminating open challenges and opportunities for prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T19:49:13Z)
• Iterative Zero-Shot LLM Prompting for Knowledge Graph Construction [104.29108668347727]
  This paper proposes an innovative knowledge graph generation approach that leverages the potential of the latest generative large language models. The approach is conveyed in a pipeline that comprises novel iterative zero-shot and external knowledge-agnostic strategies. We claim that our proposal is a suitable solution for scalable and versatile knowledge graph construction and may be applied to different and novel contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T16:01:45Z)
• Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks. We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z)
• TEMPERA: Test-Time Prompting via Reinforcement Learning [57.48657629588436]
  We propose Test-time Prompt Editing using Reinforcement learning (TEMPERA) In contrast to prior prompt generation methods, TEMPERA can efficiently leverage prior knowledge. Our method achieves 5.33x on average improvement in sample efficiency when compared to the traditional fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T22:38:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.