Regulating Ride-Sourcing Markets: Can Minimum Wage Regulation Protect Drivers Without Disrupting the Market?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11845v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:29:47 GMT
• Title: Regulating Ride-Sourcing Markets: Can Minimum Wage Regulation Protect Drivers Without Disrupting the Market?
• Abstract summary: Ride-sourcing platforms such as Uber and Lyft are prime examples of the gig economy.<n> minimum wage regulation is adopted to improve drivers welfare.<n>Our findings reveal that minimum wage regulation impacts substantially drivers income.
• Score: 1.3649494534428743
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ride-sourcing platforms such as Uber and Lyft are prime examples of the gig economy, recruiting drivers as independent contractors, thereby avoiding legal and fiscal obligations. Although platforms offer flexibility in choosing work shifts and areas, many drivers experience low income and poor working conditions, leading to widespread strikes and protests. Minimum wage regulation is adopted to improve drivers welfare. However, the impacts of this regulation on drivers as well as on travelers and platforms, remain largely unknown. While ride-sourcing platforms do not disclose the relevant data, state-of-the-art models fail to explain the effects of minimum wage regulation on market dynamics. In this study, we assess the effectiveness and implications of minimum wage regulation in ride-sourcing markets while simulating the detailed dynamics of ride-sourcing markets under varying regulation intensities, both with and without the so-called platform lockout strategy. Our findings reveal that minimum wage regulation impacts substantially drivers income, and may lead to higher fares for travelers and threaten platforms survival. When platforms adopt a lockout strategy, their profitability significantly improves and drivers earn more, although many others lose their jobs, and service level for travelers consequently declines.

Related papers

• Fairness Dynamics in Digital Economy Platforms with Biased Ratings [50.29721091981893]
  We study how digital platforms can perpetuate or counteract rating-based discrimination.<n>Our results demonstrate a fundamental trade-off between user experience and fairness.<n>Our results also provide evidence that intervening by tuning the demographics of the search results is a highly effective way of reducing unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T18:41:16Z)
• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• Not Even Nice Work If You Can Get It; A Longitudinal Study of Uber's Algorithmic Pay and Pricing [20.694356269172857]
  Ride-sharing platforms like Uber market themselves as enabling flexibility' for their workforce.<n>We describe our process of participatory action research with drivers and trade union organisers, culminating in a participatory audit of Uber's algorithmic pay and work allocation.<n>We find that after dynamic pricing, pay has decreased, Uber's cut has increased, job allocation and pay is less predictable, inequality between drivers is increased, and drivers spend more time waiting for jobs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T08:59:39Z)
• GARLIC: GPT-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Intelligent Control for Vehicle Dispatching [81.82487256783674]
  GARLIC: a framework of GPT-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Intelligent Control for vehicle dispatching.<n>This paper introduces GARLIC: a framework of GPT-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Intelligent Control for vehicle dispatching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T08:23:38Z)
• Studying the Impact of Semi-Cooperative Drivers on Overall Highway Flow [76.38515853201116]
  Semi-cooperative behaviors are intrinsic properties of human drivers and should be considered for autonomous driving. New autonomous planners can consider the social value orientation (SVO) of human drivers to generate socially-compliant trajectories. We present study of implicit semi-cooperative driving where agents deploy a game-theoretic version of iterative best response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T16:01:36Z)
• Discovering and Explaining Driver Behaviour under HoS Regulations [0.0]
  This paper presents an application for summarising raw driver activity logs according to Hours of Service regulations. The system employs planning, constraint, and clustering techniques to extract and describe what the driver has been doing. An experimentation in real world data indicates that recurring driving patterns can be clustered from short basic driving sequences to whole drivers working days.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T15:30:11Z)
• Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Pooling [10.613763106603272]
  We investigate two methods to reduce forms of inequality in ride-pooling platforms. First, we find that optimizing for driver-side fairness outperforms state-of-the-art models on the number of riders serviced. Second, we explore income redistribution as a way to combat income inequality by having drivers keep an $r$ fraction of their income, and contribute the rest to a redistribution pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T14:53:37Z)
• Emergent Road Rules In Multi-Agent Driving Environments [84.82583370858391]
  We analyze what ingredients in driving environments cause the emergence of road rules. We find that two crucial factors are noisy perception and agents' spatial density. Our results add empirical support for the social road rules that countries worldwide have agreed on for safe, efficient driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-21T09:43:50Z)
• Real-time and Large-scale Fleet Allocation of Autonomous Taxis: A Case Study in New York Manhattan Island [14.501650948647324]
  Traditional models fail to efficiently allocate the available fleet to deal with the imbalance of supply (autonomous taxis) and demand (trips) We employ a Constrained Multi-agent Markov Decision Processes (CMMDP) to model fleet allocation decisions. We also leverage a Column Generation algorithm to guarantee the efficiency and optimality in a large scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-06T16:00:15Z)
• Investigating Taxi and Uber competition in New York City: Multi-agent modeling by reinforcement-learning [0.0]
  This study investigates the existing competition between the mainstream hailing services (i.e., Yellow and Green Cabs) and e-hailing services (i.e., Uber) in New York City. Data visualization techniques are employed to find existing and new patterns in travel behavior. Results of our study illustrate that e-hailers dominate low-travel-density areas, and that e-hailers quickly identify and respond to change in travel demand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T08:08:18Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.