Synthetic Data and the Shifting Ground of Truth

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13355v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:35:11 GMT
• Title: Synthetic Data and the Shifting Ground of Truth
• Authors: Dietmar Offenhuber,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines how ML researchers and practitioners bootstrap ground truth without relying on the stable ground of representation and real-world reference.<n>It will also reflect on the broader implications of a shift from a representational to what could be described as a mimetic or iconic concept of data.
• Score: 3.4858077573471107
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of synthetic data for privacy protection, training data generation, or simply convenient access to quasi-realistic data in any shape or volume complicates the concept of ground truth. Synthetic data mimic real-world observations, but do not refer to external features. This lack of a representational relationship, however, not prevent researchers from using synthetic data as training data for AI models and ground truth repositories. It is claimed that the lack of data realism is not merely an acceptable tradeoff, but often leads to better model performance than realistic data: compensate for known biases, prevent overfitting and support generalization, and make the models more robust in dealing with unexpected outliers. Indeed, injecting noisy and outright implausible data into training sets can be beneficial for the model. This greatly complicates usual assumptions based on which representational accuracy determines data fidelity (garbage in - garbage out). Furthermore, ground truth becomes a self-referential affair, in which the labels used as a ground truth repository are themselves synthetic products of a generative model and as such not connected to real-world observations. My paper examines how ML researchers and practitioners bootstrap ground truth under such paradoxical circumstances without relying on the stable ground of representation and real-world reference. It will also reflect on the broader implications of a shift from a representational to what could be described as a mimetic or iconic concept of data.

Related papers

• Harnessing Synthetic Data from Generative AI for Statistical Inference [6.0353292419288485]
  This paper reviews the current landscape of synthetic data generation and use from a statistical perspective.<n>We survey major classes of modern generative models, their intended use cases, and the benefits they offer.<n>We examine common pitfalls that arise when synthetic data are treated as surrogates for real observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T17:24:41Z)
• Understanding the Influence of Synthetic Data for Text Embedders [52.04771455432998]
  We first reproduce and publicly release the synthetic data proposed by Wang et al.<n>We critically examine where exactly synthetic data improves model generalization.<n>Our findings highlight the limitations of current synthetic data approaches for building general-purpose embedders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T19:28:52Z)
• Using Imperfect Synthetic Data in Downstream Inference Tasks [50.40949503799331]
  We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can improve estimates of the target parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T18:32:52Z)
• The Comparability of Model Fusion to Measured Data in Confuser Rejection [0.24578723416255746]
  No dataset can account for every slight deviation we might see in live usage.<n>Simulators have been developed utilizing the shooting and bouncing ray method to allow for the generation of synthetic SAR data on 3D models.<n>We aim to use computational power as a substitution for this lack of quality measured data, by ensembling many models trained on synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:51:30Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted.<n>Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs)<n>Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• Massively Annotated Datasets for Assessment of Synthetic and Real Data in Face Recognition [0.2775636978045794]
  We study the drift between the performance of models trained on real and synthetic datasets. We conduct studies on the differences between real and synthetic datasets on the attribute set. Interestingly enough, we have verified that while real samples suffice to explain the synthetic distribution, the opposite could not be further from being true.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T17:10:49Z)
• The Real Deal Behind the Artificial Appeal: Inferential Utility of Tabular Synthetic Data [40.165159490379146]
  We show that the rate of false-positive findings (type 1 error) will be unacceptably high, even when the estimates are unbiased. Despite the use of a previously proposed correction factor, this problem persists for deep generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T02:04:41Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• Utility Theory of Synthetic Data Generation [12.511220449652384]
  This paper bridges the practice-theory gap by establishing relevant utility theory in a statistical learning framework.<n>It considers two utility metrics: generalization and ranking of models trained on synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T07:49:16Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• A Scaling Law for Synthetic-to-Real Transfer: A Measure of Pre-Training [52.93808218720784]
  Synthetic-to-real transfer learning is a framework in which we pre-train models with synthetically generated images and ground-truth annotations for real tasks. Although synthetic images overcome the data scarcity issue, it remains unclear how the fine-tuning performance scales with pre-trained models. We observe a simple and general scaling law that consistently describes learning curves in various tasks, models, and complexities of synthesized pre-training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T02:29:28Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.