Benefits of Online Tilted Empirical Risk Minimization: A Case Study of Outlier Detection and Robust Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15141v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:51:23 GMT
• Title: Benefits of Online Tilted Empirical Risk Minimization: A Case Study of Outlier Detection and Robust Regression
• Authors: Yigit E. Yildirim, Samet Demir, Zafer Dogan,
• Abstract summary: Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a foundational framework for supervised learning.<n>In online or streaming settings where data arrive one sample at a time, the classical TERM objective degenerates to standard ERM.<n>We propose an online TERM that removes the logarithm from the classical objective, preserving tilt effects without additional computational or memory overhead.
• Score: 7.238889207632064
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a foundational framework for supervised learning but primarily optimizes average-case performance, often neglecting fairness and robustness considerations. Tilted Empirical Risk Minimization (TERM) extends ERM by introducing an exponential tilt hyperparameter $t$ to balance average-case accuracy with worst-case fairness and robustness. However, in online or streaming settings where data arrive one sample at a time, the classical TERM objective degenerates to standard ERM, losing tilt sensitivity. We address this limitation by proposing an online TERM formulation that removes the logarithm from the classical objective, preserving tilt effects without additional computational or memory overhead. This formulation enables a continuous trade-off controlled by $t$, smoothly interpolating between ERM ($t \to 0$), fairness emphasis ($t > 0$), and robustness to outliers ($t < 0$). We empirically validate online TERM on two representative streaming tasks: robust linear regression with adversarial outliers and minority-class detection in binary classification. Our results demonstrate that negative tilting effectively suppresses outlier influence, while positive tilting improves recall with minimal impact on precision, all at per-sample computational cost equivalent to ERM. Online TERM thus recovers the full robustness-fairness spectrum of classical TERM in an efficient single-sample learning regime.

Related papers

• Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental Design [55.998153710215654]
  We propose Active Residual Learning, a new paradigm that leverages the observational model as a foundational prior.<n>This approach shifts the experimental focus from learning target causal quantities from scratch to efficiently estimating the residuals required to correct observational bias.<n> Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks demonstrate that R-Design significantly outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T06:52:37Z)
• ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
  ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z)
• On the Generalization and Robustness in Conditional Value-at-Risk [12.253712889424584]
  We develop a learning-theoretic analysis of Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR)-based empirical risk minimization under heavy-tailed and contaminated data.<n>We establish sharp, high-probability generalization and excess risk bounds under minimal moment assumptions.<n>We show that CVaR decisions themselves can be intrinsically unstable under heavy tails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T08:10:11Z)
• Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling for Stable RLHF: Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking [78.69179041551014]
  We propose an information-theoretic reward modeling framework based on the Information Bottleneck principle.<n>We show that InfoRM filters out preference-irrelevant information to alleviate reward misgeneralization.<n>We also introduce IBL, a distribution-level regularization that penalizes such deviations, effectively expanding the optimization landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:51:59Z)
• Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Update [60.414548453838506]
  We study the generalized linear bandit (GLB) problem, a contextual multi-armed bandit framework that extends the classical linear model by incorporating a non-linear link function.<n>GLBs are widely applicable to real-world scenarios, but their non-linear nature introduces significant challenges in achieving both computational and statistical efficiency.<n>We propose a jointly efficient algorithm that attains a nearly optimal regret bound with $mathcalO(1)$ time and space complexities per round.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T02:24:21Z)
• Distributionally Robust Optimization with Adversarial Data Contamination [49.89480853499918]
  We focus on optimizing Wasserstein-1 DRO objectives for generalized linear models with convex Lipschitz loss functions.<n>Our primary contribution lies in a novel modeling framework that integrates robustness against training data contamination with robustness against distributional shifts.<n>This work establishes the first rigorous guarantees, supported by efficient computation, for learning under the dual challenges of data contamination and distributional shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T18:34:10Z)
• Revisiting Essential and Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep Learning [70.82728812001807]
  Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) is an emerging method for uncertainty estimation. We propose Re-EDL, a simplified yet more effective variant of EDL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T04:27:07Z)
• $i$REPO: $i$mplicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization [12.266207199002604]
  Large Language Models (LLM) can sometimes produce outputs that deviate from human expectations. We propose a novel framework named $i$REPO, which utilizes implicit Reward pairwise difference regression for Empirical Preference Optimization. We show that $i$REPO effectively achieves self-alignment using soft-label, self-generated responses and the logit of empirical AI annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T05:42:11Z)
• On the Performance of Empirical Risk Minimization with Smoothed Data [59.3428024282545]
  Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is able to achieve sublinear error whenever a class is learnable with iid data. We show that ERM is able to achieve sublinear error whenever a class is learnable with iid data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T21:55:41Z)
• Fraud Detection Using Optimized Machine Learning Tools Under Imbalance Classes [0.304585143845864]
  Fraud detection with smart versions of machine learning (ML) tools is essential to assure safety. We investigate four state-of-the-art ML techniques, namely, logistic regression, decision trees, random forest, and extreme gradient boost. For phishing website URLs and credit card fraud transaction datasets, the results indicate that extreme gradient boost trained on the original data shows trustworthy performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T15:30:23Z)
• False Correlation Reduction for Offline Reinforcement Learning [115.11954432080749]
  We propose falSe COrrelation REduction (SCORE) for offline RL, a practically effective and theoretically provable algorithm. We empirically show that SCORE achieves the SoTA performance with 3.1x acceleration on various tasks in a standard benchmark (D4RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:34:03Z)
• On Tilted Losses in Machine Learning: Theory and Applications [26.87656095874882]
  Exponential tilting is a technique commonly used in fields such as statistics, probability, information theory, and optimization. We study a simple extension to ERM, which uses exponential tilting to flexibly tune the impact of individual losses. We find that the framework can consistently outperform ERM and deliver competitive performance with state-of-the-art, problem-specific approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T17:33:42Z)
• Risk Minimization from Adaptively Collected Data: Guarantees for Supervised and Policy Learning [57.88785630755165]
  Empirical risk minimization (ERM) is the workhorse of machine learning, but its model-agnostic guarantees can fail when we use adaptively collected data. We study a generic importance sampling weighted ERM algorithm for using adaptively collected data to minimize the average of a loss function over a hypothesis class. For policy learning, we provide rate-optimal regret guarantees that close an open gap in the existing literature whenever exploration decays to zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T09:50:13Z)
• SLOE: A Faster Method for Statistical Inference in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression [68.66245730450915]
  We develop an improved method for debiasing predictions and estimating frequentist uncertainty for practical datasets. Our main contribution is SLOE, an estimator of the signal strength with convergence guarantees that reduces the computation time of estimation and inference by orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:48:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.