Kernel Model Validation: How To Do It, And Why You Should Care

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15244v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:35:00 GMT
• Title: Kernel Model Validation: How To Do It, And Why You Should Care
• Authors: Carlo Graziani, Marieme Ngom,
• Abstract summary: We motivate the importance of proper probabilistic calibration of GP predictions by describing how GP predictive calibration failures can cause degraded convergence properties.<n>We discuss the interpretation of GP-generated uncertainty intervals in uncertainty quantification (UQ)<n>We give simple examples of GP regression misspecified 1-dimensional models, and discuss the situation with respect to higher-dimensional models.
• Score: 0.9167082845109437
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Gaussian Process (GP) models are popular tools in uncertainty quantification (UQ) because they purport to furnish functional uncertainty estimates that can be used to represent model uncertainty. It is often difficult to state with precision what probabilistic interpretation attaches to such an uncertainty, and in what way is it calibrated. Without such a calibration statement, the value of such uncertainty estimates is quite limited and qualitative. We motivate the importance of proper probabilistic calibration of GP predictions by describing how GP predictive calibration failures can cause degraded convergence properties in a target optimization algorithm called Targeted Adaptive Design (TAD). We discuss the interpretation of GP-generated uncertainty intervals in UQ, and how one may learn to trust them, through a formal procedure for covariance kernel validation that exploits the multivariate normal nature of GP predictions. We give simple examples of GP regression misspecified 1-dimensional models, and discuss the situation with respect to higher-dimensional models.

Related papers

• Nonparametric Distribution Regression Re-calibration [3.0204520109309847]
  Minimizing overall prediction error encourages models to prioritize informativeness over calibration.<n>In safety-critical settings, trustworthy uncertainty estimates are often more valuable than narrow intervals.<n>We propose a novel non-parametric re-calibration algorithm based on conditional kernel mean embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T11:48:43Z)
• Evaluation of uncertainty estimations for Gaussian process regression based machine learning interatomic potentials [0.0]
  Uncertainty estimations for machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are crucial for quantifying model error.<n>We evaluate uncertainty estimations of GPR-based MLIPs, including the predictive GPR standard deviation and ensemble-based uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T10:06:09Z)
• Online scalable Gaussian processes with conformal prediction for guaranteed coverage [32.21093722162573]
  The consistency of the resulting uncertainty values hinges on the premise that the learning function conforms to the properties specified by the GP model. We propose to wed the GP with the prevailing conformal prediction (CP), a distribution-free post-processing framework that produces it prediction sets with a provably valid coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:22:15Z)
• Leveraging Locality and Robustness to Achieve Massively Scalable Gaussian Process Regression [1.3518297878940662]
  We introduce a new perspective by exploring robustness properties and limiting behaviour of GP nearest-neighbour (GPnn) prediction. As the data-size n increases, accuracy of estimated parameters and GP model assumptions become increasingly irrelevant to GPnn predictive accuracy. We show that this source of inaccuracy can be corrected for, thereby achieving both well-calibrated uncertainty measures and accurate predictions at remarkably low computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T14:32:46Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Disentangling Derivatives, Uncertainty and Error in Gaussian Process Models [12.229461458053809]
  We showcase how the derivative of a GP model can be used to provide an analytical error propagation formulation. We analyze the predictive variance and the propagated error terms in a temperature prediction problem from infrared sounding data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T10:03:13Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Uncertainty quantification using martingales for misspecified Gaussian processes [52.22233158357913]
  We address uncertainty quantification for Gaussian processes (GPs) under misspecified priors. We construct a confidence sequence (CS) for the unknown function using martingale techniques. Our CS is statistically valid and empirically outperforms standard GP methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T17:58:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.