Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15278v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:56:03 GMT
• Title: Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging
• Authors: Emilie Kibsgaard, Anita Sue Jwa, Christopher J Markiewicz, David Rodriguez Gonzalez, Judith Sainz Pardo, Russell A. Poldrack, Cyril R. Pernet,
• Abstract summary: We reviewed data from six neuroimaging datasets openly available on OpenNeuro.<n>We found that privacy is generally well maintained, with serious vulnerabilities being rare.<n>We outline practical measures to address these risks, enabling safer data sharing practices.
• Score: 2.176772544213644
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The ethical and legal imperative to share research data without causing harm requires careful attention to privacy risks. While mounting evidence demonstrates that data sharing benefits science, legitimate concerns persist regarding the potential leakage of personal information that could lead to reidentification and subsequent harm. We reviewed metadata accompanying neuroimaging datasets from six heterogeneous studies openly available on OpenNeuro, involving participants across the lifespan, from children to older adults, with and without clinical diagnoses, and including associated clinical score data. Using metaprivBIDS (https://github.com/CPernet/metaprivBIDS), a novel tool for the systematic assessment of privacy in tabular data, we found that privacy is generally well maintained, with serious vulnerabilities being rare. Nonetheless, minor issues were identified in nearly all datasets and warrant mitigation. Notably, clinical score data (e.g., neuropsychological results) posed minimal reidentification risk, whereas demographic variables (age, sex, race, income, and geolocation) represented the principal privacy vulnerabilities. We outline practical measures to address these risks, enabling safer data sharing practices.

Related papers

• Aim High, Stay Private: Differentially Private Synthetic Data Enables Public Release of Behavioral Health Information with High Utility [2.1715431485081593]
  Differential Privacy (DP) provides formal guarantees against re-identification risks.<n>We generate DP synthetic data for Phase 1 of the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS)<n>We evaluate the utility of the synthetic data using a framework informed by actual uses of the LEMURS dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T15:58:34Z)
• Privacy-Aware, Public-Aligned: Embedding Risk Detection and Public Values into Scalable Clinical Text De-Identification for Trusted Research Environments [0.0]
  We show how direct and indirect identifiers vary by record type, clinical setting, and data flow, and show how changes in documentation practice can degrade model performance over time.<n>Our findings highlight that privacy risk is context-dependent and cumulative, underscoring the need for adaptable, hybrid de-identification approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T17:45:57Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• Investigating Vulnerabilities of GPS Trip Data to Trajectory-User Linking Attacks [49.1574468325115]
  We propose a novel attack to reconstruct user identifiers in GPS trip datasets consisting of single trips.<n>We show that the risk of re-identification is significant even when personal identifiers have been removed.<n>Further investigations indicate that users who frequently visit locations that are only visited by a small number of others tend to be more vulnerable to re-identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T08:54:49Z)
• Preserving The Safety And Confidentiality Of Data Mining Information In Health Care: A literature review [0.0]
  PPDM technique enables the extraction of actionable insight from enormous volume of data. Disclosing sensitive information infringes on patients' privacy. This paper aims to conduct a review of related work on privacy-preserving mechanisms, data protection regulations, and mitigating tactics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T05:32:15Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• PRIVEE: A Visual Analytic Workflow for Proactive Privacy Risk Inspection of Open Data [3.2136309934080867]
  Open data sets that contain personal information are susceptible to adversarial attacks even when anonymized. We develop a visual analytic solution that enables data defenders to gain awareness about the disclosure risks in local, joinable data neighborhoods. We use this problem and domain characterization to develop a set of visual analytic interventions as a defense mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T19:57:09Z)
• Releasing survey microdata with exact cluster locations and additional privacy safeguards [77.34726150561087]
  We propose an alternative microdata dissemination strategy that leverages the utility of the original microdata with additional privacy safeguards. Our strategy reduces the respondents' re-identification risk for any number of disclosed attributes by 60-80% even under re-identification attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T19:37:11Z)
• Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
  We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected. We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic. Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.