An Artificial Intelligence Driven Semantic Similarity-Based Pipeline for Rapid Literature

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15292v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:24:47 GMT
• Title: An Artificial Intelligence Driven Semantic Similarity-Based Pipeline for Rapid Literature
• Abstract summary: We propose an automated pipeline for performing literature reviews using semantic similarity.<n>This work emphasizes minimal overhead and high relevance by using transformer based embeddings and cosine similarity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose an automated pipeline for performing literature reviews using semantic similarity. Unlike traditional systematic review systems or optimization based methods, this work emphasizes minimal overhead and high relevance by using transformer based embeddings and cosine similarity. By providing a paper title and abstract, it generates relevant keywords, fetches relevant papers from open access repository, and ranks them based on their semantic closeness to the input. Three embedding models were evaluated. A statistical thresholding approach is then applied to filter relevant papers, enabling an effective literature review pipeline. Despite the absence of heuristic feedback or ground truth relevance labels, the proposed system shows promise as a scalable and practical tool for preliminary research and exploratory analysis.

Related papers

• What Papers Don't Tell You: Recovering Tacit Knowledge for Automated Paper Reproduction [57.86097956633207]
  method is a graph-based agent framework for generating executable code from academic papers.<n>On an extended ReproduceBench spanning 3 domains, 10 tasks, and 40 recent papers, method achieves an average performance gap of 10.04% against official implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T12:33:31Z)
• Improving Neural Topic Modeling with Semantically-Grounded Soft Label Distributions [15.97570754056266]
  We propose a novel approach to construct semantically-grounded soft label targets using Language Models (LMs)<n>Our method produces higher-quality topics that are more closely aligned with the underlying thematic structure of the corpus.<n>We also introduce a retrieval-based metric, which shows that our approach significantly outperforms existing methods in identifying semantically similar documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T00:12:04Z)
• Evaluating the impact of word embeddings on similarity scoring in practical information retrieval [0.5872014229110214]
  Vector Space Modelling (VSM) and neural word embeddings play a crucial role in modern machine learning and Natural Language Processing pipelines.<n>This paper evaluates an alternative approach to measuring query statement similarity that moves away from the common similarity measure of centroids of neural word embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T14:57:38Z)
• OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment [63.662126457336534]
  OpenNovelty is an agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis.<n>It grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments.<n>OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T15:48:51Z)
• Context-Aware Search and Retrieval Over Erasure Channels [12.794591022795355]
  We present an information-theoretic analysis of a remote document retrieval system operating over a symbol erasure channel.<n>The proposed model encodes the feature vector of a query, derived from term-frequency weights of a language corpus.<n>We derive an explicit expression for the retrieval error probability, i.e., the probability under which the less similar document is selected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T04:21:46Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance.<n>We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Mining Asymmetric Intertextuality [0.0]
  Asymmetric intertextuality refers to one-sided relationships between texts. We propose a scalable and adaptive approach for mining asymmetric intertextuality. Our system handles intertextuality at various levels, from direct quotations to paraphrasing and cross-document influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T16:12:22Z)
• Towards Interpretable and Efficient Automatic Reference-Based Summarization Evaluation [160.07938471250048]
  Interpretability and efficiency are two important considerations for the adoption of neural automatic metrics. We develop strong-performing automatic metrics for reference-based summarization evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T02:49:50Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• iFacetSum: Coreference-based Interactive Faceted Summarization for Multi-Document Exploration [63.272359227081836]
  iFacetSum integrates interactive summarization together with faceted search. Fine-grained facets are automatically produced based on cross-document coreference pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T20:01:11Z)
• Automating Document Classification with Distant Supervision to Increase the Efficiency of Systematic Reviews [18.33687903724145]
  Well-done systematic reviews are expensive, time-demanding, and labor-intensive. We propose an automatic document classification approach to significantly reduce the effort in reviewing documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T22:45:40Z)
• On Learning Text Style Transfer with Direct Rewards [101.97136885111037]
  Lack of parallel corpora makes it impossible to directly train supervised models for the text style transfer task. We leverage semantic similarity metrics originally used for fine-tuning neural machine translation models. Our model provides significant gains in both automatic and human evaluation over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T04:30:02Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)
• Hierarchical Interaction Networks with Rethinking Mechanism for Document-level Sentiment Analysis [37.20068256769269]
  Document-level Sentiment Analysis (DSA) is more challenging due to vague semantic links and complicate sentiment information. We study how to effectively generate a discriminative representation with explicit subject patterns and sentiment contexts for DSA. We design a Sentiment-based Rethinking mechanism (SR) by refining the HIN with sentiment label information to learn a more sentiment-aware document representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T16:27:38Z)
• Leveraging Cognitive Search Patterns to Enhance Automated Natural Language Retrieval Performance [0.0]
  We show that cognitive reformulation patterns that mimic user search behaviour are highlighted. We formalize the application of these patterns by considering a query conceptual representation. A genetic algorithm-based weighting process allows placing emphasis on terms according to their conceptual role-type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T14:13:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.