Foundation Models as World Models: A Foundational Study in Text-Based GridWorlds
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15915v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:10:28 GMT
- Title: Foundation Models as World Models: A Foundational Study in Text-Based GridWorlds
- Authors: Remo Sasso, Michelangelo Conserva, Dominik Jeurissen, Paulo Rauber,
- Abstract summary: Foundation models (FMs) are natural candidates to improve sample efficiency as they possess broad knowledge and reasoning capabilities.<n>We consider the use of foundation world models (FWMs) that exploit the prior knowledge of FMs to enable training and evaluating agents with simulated interactions.<n>Second, we consider the use of foundation agents (FAs) that exploit the reasoning capabilities of FMs for decision-making.
- Score: 2.9165586612027234
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While reinforcement learning from scratch has shown impressive results in solving sequential decision-making tasks with efficient simulators, real-world applications with expensive interactions require more sample-efficient agents. Foundation models (FMs) are natural candidates to improve sample efficiency as they possess broad knowledge and reasoning capabilities, but it is yet unclear how to effectively integrate them into the reinforcement learning framework. In this paper, we anticipate and, most importantly, evaluate two promising strategies. First, we consider the use of foundation world models (FWMs) that exploit the prior knowledge of FMs to enable training and evaluating agents with simulated interactions. Second, we consider the use of foundation agents (FAs) that exploit the reasoning capabilities of FMs for decision-making. We evaluate both approaches empirically in a family of grid-world environments that are suitable for the current generation of large language models (LLMs). Our results suggest that improvements in LLMs already translate into better FWMs and FAs; that FAs based on current LLMs can already provide excellent policies for sufficiently simple environments; and that the coupling of FWMs and reinforcement learning agents is highly promising for more complex settings with partial observability and stochastic elements.
Related papers
- Reinforcement World Model Learning for LLM-based Agents [60.65003139516272]
Reinforcement World Model Learning (RWML) is a self-conditioned method that learns action-supervised world models for LLM-based agents.<n>Our method aligns simulated next states produced by the model with realized next states observed from the environment.<n>We evaluate our method on ALFWorld and $2$ Bench and observe significant gains over the base model, despite being entirely self-supervised.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T16:30:08Z) - FutureMind: Equipping Small Language Models with Strategic Thinking-Pattern Priors via Adaptive Knowledge Distillation [13.855534865501369]
Small Language Models (SLMs) are attractive for cost-sensitive and resource-limited settings due to their efficient, low-latency inference.<n>We propose FutureMind, a modular reasoning framework that equips SLMs with strategic thinking-pattern priors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T13:26:04Z) - Omni-Thinker: Scaling Cross-Domain Generalization in LLMs via Multi-Task RL with Hybrid Rewards [50.21528417884747]
We introduce Omni-Thinker, a unified reinforcement learning framework that enhances large language models (LLMs) performance across diverse tasks.<n>Our approach enables consistent optimization across task types and scales RL-based training to subjective domains.<n> Experimental results across four domains reveal that curriculum learning improves performance by 5.2% over joint training and 9.1% over model merging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-20T01:50:16Z) - MeRF: Motivation-enhanced Reinforcement Finetuning for Large Reasoning Models [95.6332110724999]
Motivation-enhanced Reinforcement Finetuning (MeRF) is an intuitive yet effective method enhancing reinforcement learning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>MeRF directly injects the reward specification into the prompt, which serves as an in-context motivation for model to improve its responses with awareness of the optimization objective.<n> Empirical evaluations on the Knights and Knaves(K&K) logic puzzle reasoning benchmark demonstrate that textttMeRF achieves substantial performance gains over baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T10:37:57Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models [131.10969986056]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the natural language processing landscape and brought to life diverse applications.<n>Post-training methods enable LLMs to refine their knowledge, improve reasoning, enhance factual accuracy, and align more effectively with user intents and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T18:59:54Z) - LLM-Powered Preference Elicitation in Combinatorial Assignment [17.367432304040662]
We study the potential of large language models (LLMs) as proxies for humans to simplify preference elicitation (PE) in assignment.<n>We propose a framework for LLM proxies that can work in tandem with SOTA ML-powered preference elicitation schemes.<n>We experimentally evaluate the efficiency of LLM proxies against human queries in the well-studied course allocation domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T17:12:20Z) - Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness [66.2690963378878]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved language understanding and generation capabilities.<n>LLMs are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices due to their high computational and storage resource demands.<n>We propose structurally-aware adaptive pruning (SAAP) to significantly reduce the computational and memory costs while maintaining model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T18:08:04Z) - The Fusion of Large Language Models and Formal Methods for Trustworthy AI Agents: A Roadmap [12.363424584297974]
This paper outlines a roadmap for advancing the next generation of trustworthy AI systems.<n>We show how FMs can help LLMs generate more reliable and formally certified outputs.<n>We acknowledge that this integration has the potential to enhance both the trustworthiness and efficiency of software engineering practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-09T14:14:21Z) - On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks.
We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly.
In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z) - Extracting Heuristics from Large Language Models for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning [28.077228879886402]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) suffers from sample inefficiency in reward domains, and the problem is further pronounced in case of transitions.
To improve the sample efficiency, reward shaping is a well-studied approach to introduce intrinsic rewards that can help the RL agent converge to an optimal policy faster.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T03:53:57Z) - True Knowledge Comes from Practice: Aligning LLMs with Embodied
Environments via Reinforcement Learning [37.10401435242991]
Large language models (LLMs) often fail in solving simple decision-making tasks due to misalignment of the knowledge in LLMs with environments.
We propose TWOSOME, a novel framework that deploys LLMs as decision-making agents to efficiently interact and align with embodied environments via RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T13:03:20Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.