Incentives and Outcomes in Bug Bounties

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16655v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 12:02:45 GMT
• Title: Incentives and Outcomes in Bug Bounties
• Abstract summary: We analyze incentives and outcomes in Google's Vulnerability Rewards Program (VRP)<n>We focus on a change in Google's reward amounts posted in July, 2024, in which reward amounts increased by up to 200% for the highest impact tier.<n>Our empirical results show an increase in the volume of high-value bugs received after the reward increase, for which we also compute elasticities.
• Score: 2.1517336465358503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bug bounty programs have contributed significantly to security in technology firms in the last decade, but little is known about the role of reward incentives in producing useful outcomes. We analyze incentives and outcomes in Google's Vulnerability Rewards Program (VRP), one of the world's largest bug bounty programs. We analyze the responsiveness of the quality and quantity of bugs received to changes in payments, focusing on a change in Google's reward amounts posted in July, 2024, in which reward amounts increased by up to 200% for the highest impact tier. Our empirical results show an increase in the volume of high-value bugs received after the reward increase, for which we also compute elasticities. We further break down the sources of this increase between veteran researchers and new researchers, showing that the reward increase both redirected the attention of veteran researchers and attracted new top security researchers into the program.

Related papers

• Adversarial Reward Auditing for Active Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking [69.06218054848803]
  We propose Adrial Reward Auditing (ARA), a framework that reconceptualizes reward hacking as a dynamic, competitive game.<n>ARA operates in two stages: first, a Hacker policy discovers reward model vulnerabilities while an Auditor learns to detect exploitation from latent representations.<n>ARA achieves the best alignment-utility tradeoff among all baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T07:34:57Z)
• Stabilizing Long-term Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning with Gated Rewards [13.70228195630989]
  We introduce the SWE-oriented RL Framework, a unified system supporting multi-turn interaction, docker-based execution, and customizable reward functions.<n>We also propose Gated Reward Accumulation (G-RA), a novel method that accumulates immediate rewards only when high-level (long-term) rewards meet a predefined threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T11:37:02Z)
• Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards [94.09453548052862]
  Dense process rewards have proven a more effective alternative to the sparse outcome-level rewards in the inference-time scaling of large language models (LLMs)<n>Dense rewards also offer an appealing choice for the reinforcement learning (RL) of LLMs since their fine-grained rewards have the potential to address some inherent issues of outcome rewards.<n>This can be primarily attributed to the challenges of training process reward models (PRMs) online, where collecting high-quality process labels is prohibitively expensive.<n>We propose PRIME, which enables online PRM updates using only policy rollouts and outcome labels through implict process rewards
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T15:43:48Z)
• Exploring the Impact of Rewards on Developers' Proactive AI Accountability Behavior [0.0]
  We develop a theoretical model grounded in Self-Determination Theory to uncover the potential impact of rewards and sanctions on AI developers.<n>We identify typical sanctions and bug bounties as potential reward mechanisms by surveying related research from various domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T14:34:44Z)
• Artificial Bugs for Crowdsearch [0.0]
  We suggest augmenting such programs by inserting artificial bugs to increase the incentives to search for real (organic) bugs. We show that for this, it is sufficient to insert only one artificial bug.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:27:14Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Robust and Performance Incentivizing Algorithms for Multi-Armed Bandits with Strategic Agents [52.75161794035767]
  We introduce a class of bandit algorithms that meet the two objectives of performance incentivization and robustness simultaneously.<n>We show that settings where the principal has no information about the arms' performance characteristics can be handled by combining ideas from second price auctions with our algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T06:54:49Z)
• Would I have gotten that reward? Long-term credit assignment by counterfactual contribution analysis [50.926791529605396]
  We introduce Counterfactual Contribution Analysis (COCOA), a new family of model-based credit assignment algorithms. Our algorithms achieve precise credit assignment by measuring the contribution of actions upon obtaining subsequent rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T09:27:27Z)
• Automatic Reward Design via Learning Motivation-Consistent Intrinsic Rewards [46.068337522093096]
  We introduce the concept of motivation which captures the underlying goal of maximizing certain rewards. Our method performs better than the state-of-the-art methods in handling problems of delayed reward, exploration, and credit assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-29T14:52:02Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Proposal of a Novel Bug Bounty Implementation Using Gamification [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel bug bounty process aiming to alleviate resource demands and mitigate inherent issues. The incorporation of gamification elements provides a substitute for monetary rewards, as well as presenting possible mitigation of bug bounty program effectiveness issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T20:11:53Z)
• Fast active learning for pure exploration in reinforcement learning [48.98199700043158]
  We show that bonuses that scale with $1/n$ bring faster learning rates, improving the known upper bounds with respect to the dependence on the horizon. We also show that with an improved analysis of the stopping time, we can improve by a factor $H$ the sample complexity in the best-policy identification setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T11:28:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.