Would I have gotten that reward? Long-term credit assignment by counterfactual contribution analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16803v2
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:28:50 GMT
• Title: Would I have gotten that reward? Long-term credit assignment by counterfactual contribution analysis
• Authors: Alexander Meulemans, Simon Schug, Seijin Kobayashi, Nathaniel Daw, Gregory Wayne
• Abstract summary: We introduce Counterfactual Contribution Analysis (COCOA), a new family of model-based credit assignment algorithms. Our algorithms achieve precise credit assignment by measuring the contribution of actions upon obtaining subsequent rewards.
• Score: 50.926791529605396
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: To make reinforcement learning more sample efficient, we need better credit assignment methods that measure an action's influence on future rewards. Building upon Hindsight Credit Assignment (HCA), we introduce Counterfactual Contribution Analysis (COCOA), a new family of model-based credit assignment algorithms. Our algorithms achieve precise credit assignment by measuring the contribution of actions upon obtaining subsequent rewards, by quantifying a counterfactual query: 'Would the agent still have reached this reward if it had taken another action?'. We show that measuring contributions w.r.t. rewarding states, as is done in HCA, results in spurious estimates of contributions, causing HCA to degrade towards the high-variance REINFORCE estimator in many relevant environments. Instead, we measure contributions w.r.t. rewards or learned representations of the rewarding objects, resulting in gradient estimates with lower variance. We run experiments on a suite of problems specifically designed to evaluate long-term credit assignment capabilities. By using dynamic programming, we measure ground-truth policy gradients and show that the improved performance of our new model-based credit assignment methods is due to lower bias and variance compared to HCA and common baselines. Our results demonstrate how modeling action contributions towards rewarding outcomes can be leveraged for credit assignment, opening a new path towards sample-efficient reinforcement learning.

Related papers

• Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning [90.23629291067763]
  A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs) PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, potentially improving credit assignment over outcome reward models (ORMs) To improve a base policy by running search against a PRM or using it as dense rewards for reinforcement learning (RL), we ask: "How should we design process rewards?" We theoretically characterize the set of good provers and our results show that optimizing process rewards from such provers improves exploration during test-time search and online RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:31:23Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Reward Models for Mathematical Reasoning [14.97819343313859]
  We introduce a new design for reliable evaluation of reward models, and to validate this, we construct RewardMATH. We demonstrate that the scores on RewardMATH strongly correlate with the results of optimized policy and effectively estimate reward overoptimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T16:39:58Z)
• VinePPO: Unlocking RL Potential For LLM Reasoning Through Refined Credit Assignment [66.80143024475635]
  We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates. We show that VinePPO consistently outperforms PPO and other RL-free baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
• Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning [66.68997022043075]
  Key challenge in Bayesian IRL is bridging the computational gap between the hypothesis space of possible rewards and the likelihood. We propose ValueWalk - a new Markov chain Monte Carlo method based on this insight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:59:52Z)
• Hindsight PRIORs for Reward Learning from Human Preferences [3.4990427823966828]
  Preference based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) removes the need to hand specify a reward function by learning a reward from preference feedback over policy behaviors. Current approaches to PbRL do not address the credit assignment problem inherent in determining which parts of a behavior most contributed to a preference. We introduce a credit assignment strategy (Hindsight PRIOR) that uses a world model to approximate state importance within a trajectory and then guides rewards to be proportional to state importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T21:59:42Z)
• Towards Causal Credit Assignment [0.0]
  Hindsight Credit Assignment is a promising, but still unexplored candidate, which aims to solve the problems of both long-term and counterfactual credit assignment. In this thesis, we empirically investigate Hindsight Credit Assignment to identify its main benefits, and key points to improve. We show that our modification greatly decreases the workload of Hindsight Credit Assignment, making it more efficient and enabling it to outperform the baseline credit assignment method on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T12:06:37Z)
• Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [19.788336796981685]
  We propose a novel Distributional Reward Estimation framework for effective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (DRE-MARL) Our main idea is to design the multi-action-branch reward estimation and policy-weighted reward aggregation for stabilized training. The superiority of the DRE-MARL is demonstrated using benchmark multi-agent scenarios, compared with the SOTA baselines in terms of both effectiveness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:31:45Z)
• Revisiting QMIX: Discriminative Credit Assignment by Gradient Entropy Regularization [126.87359177547455]
  In cooperative multi-agent systems, agents jointly take actions and receive a team reward instead of individual rewards. In the absence of individual reward signals, credit assignment mechanisms are usually introduced to discriminate the contributions of different agents. We propose a new perspective on credit assignment measurement and empirically show that QMIX suffers limited discriminability on the assignment of credits to agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T12:37:55Z)
• Direct Advantage Estimation [63.52264764099532]
  We show that the expected return may depend on the policy in an undesirable way which could slow down learning. We propose the Direct Advantage Estimation (DAE), a novel method that can model the advantage function and estimate it directly from data. If desired, value functions can also be seamlessly integrated into DAE and be updated in a similar way to Temporal Difference Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T16:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.