System-Level Uncertainty Quantification with Multiple Machine Learning Models: A Theoretical Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16663v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 12:34:05 GMT
• Title: System-Level Uncertainty Quantification with Multiple Machine Learning Models: A Theoretical Framework
• Authors: Xiaoping Du,
• Abstract summary: When multiple ML models are trained using the same training points, their model uncertainties may be statistically dependent.<n>In reality, model inputs are also random with input uncertainty.<n>This study develops a theoretical framework that generates the joint distribution of multiple ML predictions.
• Score: 1.1083514956613383
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: ML models have errors when used for predictions. The errors are unknown but can be quantified by model uncertainty. When multiple ML models are trained using the same training points, their model uncertainties may be statistically dependent. In reality, model inputs are also random with input uncertainty. The effects of these types of uncertainty must be considered in decision-making and design. This study develops a theoretical framework that generates the joint distribution of multiple ML predictions given the joint distribution of model uncertainties and the joint distribution of model inputs. The strategy is to decouple the coupling between the two types of uncertainty and transform them as independent random variables. The framework lays a foundation for numerical algorithm development for various specific applications.

Related papers

• Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviors [61.92704516732144]
  We show that the most robust features for correctness prediction are those that play a distinctive causal role in the model's behavior.<n>We propose two methods that leverage causal mechanisms to predict the correctness of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T00:31:39Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Diffusion models for probabilistic programming [56.47577824219207]
  Diffusion Model Variational Inference (DMVI) is a novel method for automated approximate inference in probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) DMVI is easy to implement, allows hassle-free inference in PPLs without the drawbacks of, e.g., variational inference using normalizing flows, and does not make any constraints on the underlying neural network model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T12:17:05Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• How to Combine Variational Bayesian Networks in Federated Learning [0.0]
  Federated learning enables multiple data centers to train a central model collaboratively without exposing any confidential data. deterministic models are capable of performing high prediction accuracy, their lack of calibration and capability to quantify uncertainty is problematic for safety-critical applications. We study the effects of various aggregation schemes for variational Bayesian neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T07:53:12Z)
• Evaluating Aleatoric Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Models [15.494774321257939]
  We study conditional generative models for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. We introduce two metrics to measure the discrepancy between two conditional distributions. We demonstrate numerically how our metrics provide correct measurements of conditional distributional discrepancies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T05:39:04Z)
• Benign-Overfitting in Conditional Average Treatment Effect Prediction with Linear Regression [14.493176427999028]
  We study the benign overfitting theory in the prediction of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) with linear regression models. We show that the T-learner fails to achieve the consistency except the random assignment, while the IPW-learner converges the risk to zero if the propensity score is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:51:52Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
  We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)
• Considering discrepancy when calibrating a mechanistic electrophysiology model [41.77362715012383]
  Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a vital step in using mathematical models and simulations to take decisions. In this piece we draw attention to an important and under-addressed source of uncertainty in our predictions -- that of uncertainty in the model structure or the equations themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:26:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.