A Generative Conditional Distribution Equality Testing Framework and Its Minimax Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17729v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:57:51 GMT
• Title: A Generative Conditional Distribution Equality Testing Framework and Its Minimax Analysis
• Authors: Siming Zheng, Meifang Lan, Tong Wang, Yuanyuan Lin,
• Abstract summary: Our framework is built on neural network-based generative methods and sample splitting techniques.<n>We introduce two special tests: the generative permutation-based conditional distribution equality test and the generative classification accuracy-based conditional distribution equality test.
• Score: 6.66639633275864
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we propose a general framework for testing the equality of the conditional distributions in a two-sample problem. This problem is most relevant to transfer learning under covariate shift. Our framework is built on neural network-based generative methods and sample splitting techniques by transforming the conditional distribution testing problem into an unconditional one. We introduce two special tests: the generative permutation-based conditional distribution equality test and the generative classification accuracy-based conditional distribution equality test. Theoretically, we establish a minimax lower bound for statistical inference in testing the equality of two conditional distributions under certain smoothness conditions. We demonstrate that the generative permutation-based conditional distribution equality test and its modified version can attain this lower bound precisely or up to some iterated logarithmic factor. Moreover, we prove the testing consistency of the generative classification accuracy-based conditional distribution equality test. We also establish the convergence rate for the learned conditional generator by deriving new results related to the recently-developed offset Rademacher complexity and approximation properties using neural networks. Empirically, we conduct numerical studies including synthetic datasets and two real-world datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.

Related papers

• General Frameworks for Conditional Two-Sample Testing [3.3317825075368908]
  We study the problem of conditional two-sample testing, which aims to determine whether two populations have the same distribution after accounting for confounding factors. This problem commonly arises in various applications, such as domain adaptation and algorithmic fairness. We introduce two general frameworks that implicitly or explicitly target specific classes of distributions for their validity and power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T02:27:32Z)
• Theory on Score-Mismatched Diffusion Models and Zero-Shot Conditional Samplers [49.97755400231656]
  We present the first performance guarantee with explicit dimensional dependencies for general score-mismatched diffusion samplers.<n>We show that score mismatches result in an distributional bias between the target and sampling distributions, proportional to the accumulated mismatch between the target and training distributions.<n>This result can be directly applied to zero-shot conditional samplers for any conditional model, irrespective of measurement noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:42:12Z)
• Doubly Robust Conditional Independence Testing with Generative Neural Networks [8.323172773256449]
  This article addresses the problem of testing the conditional independence of two generic random vectors $X$ and $Y$ given a third random vector $Z$. We propose a new non-parametric testing procedure that avoids explicitly estimating any conditional distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T01:28:59Z)
• A Kernel-Based Conditional Two-Sample Test Using Nearest Neighbors (with Applications to Calibration, Regression Curves, and Simulation-Based Inference) [3.622435665395788]
  We introduce a kernel-based measure for detecting differences between two conditional distributions. When the two conditional distributions are the same, the estimate has a Gaussian limit and its variance has a simple form that can be easily estimated from the data. We also provide a resampling based test using our estimate that applies to the conditional goodness-of-fit problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:04:38Z)
• Unveil Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-free Guidance: A Sharp Statistical Theory [87.00653989457834]
  Conditional diffusion models serve as the foundation of modern image synthesis and find extensive application in fields like computational biology and reinforcement learning. Despite the empirical success, theory of conditional diffusion models is largely missing. This paper bridges the gap by presenting a sharp statistical theory of distribution estimation using conditional diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:08:24Z)
• Precise Error Rates for Computationally Efficient Testing [67.30044609837749]
  We revisit the question of simple-versus-simple hypothesis testing with an eye towards computational complexity.<n>An existing test based on linear spectral statistics achieves the best possible tradeoff curve between type I and type II error rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T04:41:16Z)
• Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing [15.478671471695794]
  Conditional randomization test (CRT) was recently proposed to test whether two random variables X and Y are conditionally independent given random variables Z. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel alternative of CRT by using nearest-neighbor sampling without assuming the exact form of the distribution of X given Z.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T07:54:36Z)
• Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
  Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset. This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute. We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Two-Sample Testing on Ranked Preference Data and the Role of Modeling Assumptions [57.77347280992548]
  In this paper, we design two-sample tests for pairwise comparison data and ranking data. Our test requires essentially no assumptions on the distributions. By applying our two-sample test on real-world pairwise comparison data, we conclude that ratings and rankings provided by people are indeed distributed differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T20:51:09Z)
• Double Generative Adversarial Networks for Conditional Independence Testing [8.359770027722275]
  High-dimensional conditional independence testing is a key building block in statistics and machine learning. We propose an inferential procedure based on double generative adversarial networks (GANs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T16:14:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.