Unsupervised Learning and Representation of Mandarin Tonal Categories by a Generative CNN

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17859v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 14:52:03 GMT
• Title: Unsupervised Learning and Representation of Mandarin Tonal Categories by a Generative CNN
• Authors: Kai Schenck, Gašper Beguš,
• Abstract summary: Tonal patterns are among the computationally most complex learning objectives in language.<n>We show that a realistic generative model of human language (ciwGAN) can learn to associate its categorical variables with Mandarin Chinese tonal categories.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper outlines the methodology for modeling tonal learning in fully unsupervised models of human language acquisition. Tonal patterns are among the computationally most complex learning objectives in language. We argue that a realistic generative model of human language (ciwGAN) can learn to associate its categorical variables with Mandarin Chinese tonal categories without any labeled data. All three trained models showed statistically significant differences in F0 across categorical variables. The model trained solely on male tokens consistently encoded tone. Our results sug- gest that not only does the model learn Mandarin tonal contrasts, but it learns a system that corresponds to a stage of acquisition in human language learners. We also outline methodology for tracing tonal representations in internal convolutional layers, which shows that linguistic tools can contribute to interpretability of deep learning and can ultimately be used in neural experiments.

Related papers

• A Distributional Perspective on Word Learning in Neural Language Models [57.41607944290822]
  There are no widely agreed-upon metrics for word learning in language models.<n>We argue that distributional signatures studied in prior work fail to capture key distributional information.<n>We obtain learning trajectories for a selection of small language models we train from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T13:15:59Z)
• An iterated learning model of language change that mixes supervised and unsupervised learning [0.0]
  The iterated learning model is an agent model which simulates the transmission of of language from generation to generation.<n>In each iteration, a language tutor exposes a na"ive pupil to a limited training set of utterances, each pairing a random meaning with the signal that conveys it.<n>The transmission bottleneck ensures that tutors must generalize beyond the training set that they experienced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:14:01Z)
• Transparency at the Source: Evaluating and Interpreting Language Models With Access to the True Distribution [4.01799362940916]
  We present a setup for training, evaluating and interpreting neural language models, that uses artificial, language-like data. The data is generated using a massive probabilistic grammar, that is itself derived from a large natural language corpus. With access to the underlying true source, our results show striking differences and outcomes in learning dynamics between different classes of words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T12:03:01Z)
• Visual Grounding Helps Learn Word Meanings in Low-Data Regimes [47.7950860342515]
  Modern neural language models (LMs) are powerful tools for modeling human sentence production and comprehension. But to achieve these results, LMs must be trained in distinctly un-human-like ways. Do models trained more naturalistically -- with grounded supervision -- exhibit more humanlike language learning? We investigate this question in the context of word learning, a key sub-task in language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T03:33:36Z)
• Counteracts: Testing Stereotypical Representation in Pre-trained Language Models [4.211128681972148]
  We use counterexamples to examine the internal stereotypical knowledge in pre-trained language models (PLMs) We evaluate 7 PLMs on 9 types of cloze-style prompt with different information and base knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T07:52:59Z)
• What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition [47.761188531404066]
  Rapid progress in machine learning for natural language processing has the potential to transform debates about how humans learn language. To increase the relevance of learnability results from computational models, we need to train model learners without significant advantages over humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T00:12:37Z)
• Is neural language acquisition similar to natural? A chronological probing study [0.0515648410037406]
  We present the chronological probing study of transformer English models such as MultiBERT and T5. We compare the information about the language learned by the models in the process of training on corpora. The results show that 1) linguistic information is acquired in the early stages of training 2) both language models demonstrate capabilities to capture various features from various levels of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T17:24:11Z)
• Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models [84.86942006830772]
  We conjecture that multilingual pre-trained models can derive language-universal abstractions about grammar. We conduct the first large-scale empirical study over 43 languages and 14 morphosyntactic categories with a state-of-the-art neuron-level probe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T12:22:31Z)
• Dependency-based Mixture Language Models [53.152011258252315]
  We introduce the Dependency-based Mixture Language Models. In detail, we first train neural language models with a novel dependency modeling objective. We then formulate the next-token probability by mixing the previous dependency modeling probability distributions with self-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T06:28:30Z)
• Uncovering Constraint-Based Behavior in Neural Models via Targeted Fine-Tuning [9.391375268580806]
  We show that competing linguistic processes within a language obscure underlying linguistic knowledge. While human behavior has been found to be similar across languages, we find cross-linguistic variation in model behavior. Our results suggest that models need to learn both the linguistic constraints in a language and their relative ranking, with mismatches in either producing non-human-like behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T14:52:11Z)
• Leveraging Adversarial Training in Self-Learning for Cross-Lingual Text Classification [52.69730591919885]
  We present a semi-supervised adversarial training process that minimizes the maximal loss for label-preserving input perturbations. We observe significant gains in effectiveness on document and intent classification for a diverse set of languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T19:38:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.