Medical priority fusion: achieving dual optimization of sensitivity and interpretability in nipt anomaly detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17924v1
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:49:20 GMT
- Title: Medical priority fusion: achieving dual optimization of sensitivity and interpretability in nipt anomaly detection
- Authors: Xiuqi Ge, Zhibo Yao, Yaosong Du,
- Abstract summary: Clinical machine learning faces a critical dilemma in high-stakes medical applications.<n>A paradox becomes particularly acute in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), where missed chromosomal abnormalities carry profound clinical consequences.<n>We introduce Medical Priority Fusion (MPF), a constrained multi-objective optimization framework that resolves this fundamental trade-off.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Clinical machine learning faces a critical dilemma in high-stakes medical applications: algorithms achieving optimal diagnostic performance typically sacrifice the interpretability essential for physician decision-making, while interpretable methods compromise sensitivity in complex scenarios. This paradox becomes particularly acute in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), where missed chromosomal abnormalities carry profound clinical consequences yet regulatory frameworks mandate explainable AI systems. We introduce Medical Priority Fusion (MPF), a constrained multi-objective optimization framework that resolves this fundamental trade-off by systematically integrating Naive Bayes probabilistic reasoning with Decision Tree rule-based logic through mathematically-principled weighted fusion under explicit medical constraints. Rigorous validation on 1,687 real-world NIPT samples characterized by extreme class imbalance (43.4:1 normal-to-abnormal ratio) employed stratified 5-fold cross-validation with comprehensive ablation studies and statistical hypothesis testing using McNemar's paired comparisons. MPF achieved simultaneous optimization of dual objectives: 89.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 83.9-94.7%) with 80% interpretability score, significantly outperforming individual algorithms (McNemar's test, p < 0.001). The optimal fusion configuration achieved Grade A clinical deployment criteria with large effect size (d = 1.24), establishing the first clinically-deployable solution that maintains both diagnostic accuracy and decision transparency essential for prenatal care. This work demonstrates that medical-constrained algorithm fusion can resolve the interpretability-performance trade-off, providing a mathematical framework for developing high-stakes medical decision support systems that meet both clinical efficacy and explainability requirements.
Related papers
- MedAD-R1: Eliciting Consistent Reasoning in Interpretible Medical Anomaly Detection via Consistency-Reinforced Policy Optimization [46.65200216642429]
We introduce MedAD-38K, the first large-scale, multi-modal, and multi-center benchmark for MedAD featuring diagnostic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations alongside structured Visual Question-Answering (VQA) pairs.<n>Our proposed model, MedAD-R1, achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the MedAD-38K benchmark, outperforming strong baselines by more than 10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T07:56:10Z) - MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z) - Diagnosing Hallucination Risk in AI Surgical Decision-Support: A Sequential Framework for Sequential Validation [5.469454486414467]
Large language models (LLMs) offer transformative potential for clinical decision support in spine surgery.<n>LLMs pose significant risks through hallucinations, which are factually inconsistent or contextually misaligned outputs.<n>This study introduces a clinician-centered framework to quantify hallucination risks by evaluating diagnostic precision, recommendation quality, reasoning robustness, output coherence, and knowledge alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T15:25:55Z) - PSO-XAI: A PSO-Enhanced Explainable AI Framework for Reliable Breast Cancer Detection [2.5631347250059577]
This study proposes an integrated framework that incorporates customized Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for feature selection.<n>The proposed approach achieved a superior score of 99.1% across all performance metrics, including accuracy and precision.<n>Results highlight the potential of combining swarm intelligence with explainable ML for robust, trustworthy, and clinically meaningful breast cancer diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T14:42:50Z) - Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z) - A Hybrid Enumeration Framework for Optimal Counterfactual Generation in Post-Acute COVID-19 Heart Failure [1.9794615806637272]
We present a counterfactual inference framework for individualized risk estimation and intervention analysis.<n>The framework combines exact enumeration with optimization-based methods, including the Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanations (NICE) and Multi-Objective Counterfactuals (MOC) algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T17:35:12Z) - An Explainable Hybrid AI Framework for Enhanced Tuberculosis and Symptom Detection [55.35661671061754]
Tuberculosis remains a critical global health issue, particularly in resource-limited and remote areas.<n>We propose a framework which enhances disease and symptom detection on chest X-rays by integrating two supervised heads and a self-supervised head.<n>Our model achieves an accuracy of 98.85% for distinguishing between COVID-19, tuberculosis, and normal cases, and a macro-F1 score of 90.09% for multilabel symptom detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T17:18:55Z) - A Fully Automatic Framework for Intracranial Pressure Grading: Integrating Keyframe Identification, ONSD Measurement and Clinical Data [3.6652537579778106]
Intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation poses severe threats to cerebral function, thus necessitating monitoring for timely intervention.<n>We introduce a fully automatic two-stage framework for ICP grading, integrating ONSD measurement and clinical data.<n>Our method achieves a validation accuracy of $0.845 pm 0.071$ and an independent test accuracy of 0.786, significantly outperforming conventional threshold-based method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-11T11:37:48Z) - From Promise to Practical Reality: Transforming Diffusion MRI Analysis with Fast Deep Learning Enhancement [35.368152968098194]
FastFOD-Net is an end-to-end deep learning framework enhancing FODs with superior performance and delivering training/inference efficiency for clinical use.<n>This work will facilitate the more widespread adoption of, and build clinical trust in, deep learning based methods for diffusion MRI enhancement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T17:56:29Z) - Large Language Model's Multi-Capability Alignment in Biomedical Domain [3.1427813443719868]
BalancedBio is a framework for parameter-efficient biomedical reasoning.<n>It addresses multi-capability integration in domain-specific AI alignment.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art results in its parameter class.<n>Real-world deployment yields 78% cost reduction, 23% improved diagnostic accuracy, and 89% clinician acceptance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T10:06:11Z) - RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z) - TrialMatchAI: An End-to-End AI-powered Clinical Trial Recommendation System to Streamline Patient-to-Trial Matching [0.0]
We present TrialMatchAI, an AI-powered recommendation system that automates patient-to-trial matching.<n>Built on fine-tuned, open-source large language models, TrialMatchAI ensures transparency and maintains a lightweight deployment footprint.<n>In real-world validation, 92 percent of oncology patients had at least one relevant trial retrieved within the top 20 recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T12:39:06Z) - Medical Reasoning in LLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of DeepSeek R1 [0.0]
This study assesses DeepSeek R1's medical reasoning against expert patterns using 100 MedQA clinical cases.<n>The model achieved 93% diagnostic accuracy, demonstrating systematic clinical judgment through differential diagnosis, guideline-based treatment selection, and integration of patient-specific factors.<n>Error analysis of seven incorrect cases revealed persistent limitations: anchoring bias, challenges reconciling conflicting data, insufficient exploration of alternatives, overthinking, knowledge gaps, and premature prioritization of definitive treatment over intermediate care.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T09:18:08Z) - Primary Care Diagnoses as a Reliable Predictor for Orthopedic Surgical Interventions [0.10624941710159722]
Referral workflow inefficiencies contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes and higher healthcare costs.<n>In this study, we investigated the possibility of predicting procedural needs based on primary care diagnostic entries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T17:15:12Z) - XAI for In-hospital Mortality Prediction via Multimodal ICU Data [57.73357047856416]
We propose an efficient, explainable AI solution for predicting in-hospital mortality via multimodal ICU data.
We employ multimodal learning in our framework, which can receive heterogeneous inputs from clinical data and make decisions.
Our framework can be easily transferred to other clinical tasks, which facilitates the discovery of crucial factors in healthcare research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-29T14:28:04Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic
Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making.
We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.