Scaling Laws for Neural Material Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21811v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 03:14:46 GMT
• Title: Scaling Laws for Neural Material Models
• Authors: Akshay Trikha, Kyle Chu, Advait Gosai, Parker Szachta, Eric Weiner,
• Abstract summary: Predicting material properties is crucial for designing better batteries, semiconductors, and medical devices.<n>Deep learning helps scientists quickly find promising materials by predicting their energy, forces, and stresses.<n>Our team analyzes how scaling training data (giving models more information to learn from), model sizes (giving models more capacity to learn patterns), and compute for neural networks affects their performance for material property prediction.
• Score: 1.3048920509133808
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Predicting material properties is crucial for designing better batteries, semiconductors, and medical devices. Deep learning helps scientists quickly find promising materials by predicting their energy, forces, and stresses. Companies scale capacities of deep learning models in multiple domains, such as language modeling, and invest many millions of dollars into such models. Our team analyzes how scaling training data (giving models more information to learn from), model sizes (giving models more capacity to learn patterns), and compute (giving models more computational resources) for neural networks affects their performance for material property prediction. In particular, we trained both transformer and EquiformerV2 neural networks to predict material properties. We find empirical scaling laws for these models: we can predict how increasing each of the three hyperparameters (training data, model size, and compute) affects predictive performance. In particular, the loss $L$ can be measured with a power law relationship $L = \alpha \cdot N^{-\beta}$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are constants while $N$ is the relevant hyperparameter. We also incorporate command-line arguments for changing training settings such as the amount of epochs, maximum learning rate, and whether mixed precision is enabled. Future work could entail further investigating scaling laws for other neural network models in this domain, such as GemNet and fully connected networks, to assess how they compare to the models we trained.

Related papers

• Compute-Optimal Scaling for Value-Based Deep RL [99.680827753493]
  We investigate compute scaling for online, value-based deep RL.<n>Our analysis reveals a nuanced interplay between model size, batch size, and UTD.<n>We provide a mental model for understanding this phenomenon and build guidelines for choosing batch size and UTD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T17:54:21Z)
• The interplay between domain specialization and model size [8.653321928148547]
  We investigate the interplay between domain and model size during continued pretraining under compute-constrained scenarios.<n>Our goal is to identify an optimal training regime for this scenario and detect patterns in this interplay that can be generalized across different model sizes and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-03T19:28:53Z)
• An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws in the multitask sparse parity problem [2.598133279943607]
  We present a framework where each new ability (a skill) is represented as a basis function. We find analytic expressions for the emergence of new skills, as well as for scaling laws of the loss with training time, data size, model size, and optimal compute. Our simple model captures, using a single fit parameter, the sigmoidal emergence of multiple new skills as training time, data size or model size increases in the neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T17:45:32Z)
• A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws [79.59705237659547]
  We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. Our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T01:41:38Z)
• A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws [72.8349503901712]
  Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws. We propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology. Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T15:13:18Z)
• Human Trajectory Prediction via Neural Social Physics [63.62824628085961]
  Trajectory prediction has been widely pursued in many fields, and many model-based and model-free methods have been explored. We propose a new method combining both methodologies based on a new Neural Differential Equation model. Our new model (Neural Social Physics or NSP) is a deep neural network within which we use an explicit physics model with learnable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T12:11:18Z)
• DNNAbacus: Toward Accurate Computational Cost Prediction for Deep Neural Networks [0.9896984829010892]
  This paper investigates the computational resource demands of 29 classical deep neural networks and builds accurate models for predicting computational costs. We propose a lightweight prediction approach DNNAbacus with a novel network structural matrix for network representation. Our experimental results show that the mean relative error (MRE) is 0.9% with respect to time and 2.8% with respect to memory for 29 classic models, which is much lower than the state-of-the-art works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T14:21:27Z)
• Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Data [86.66720175866415]
  We present a conceptual framework, datamodeling, for analyzing the behavior of a model class in terms of the training data. We show that even simple linear datamodels can successfully predict model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T18:15:24Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Training Deep Neural Networks with Constrained Learning Parameters [4.917317902787792]
  A significant portion of deep learning tasks would run on edge computing systems. We propose the Combinatorial Neural Network Training Algorithm (CoNNTrA) CoNNTrA trains deep learning models with ternary learning parameters on the MNIST, Iris and ImageNet data sets. Our results indicate that CoNNTrA models use 32x less memory and have errors at par with the Backpropagation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T16:20:11Z)
• A Neural Scaling Law from the Dimension of the Data Manifold [8.656787568717252]
  When data is plentiful, the loss achieved by well-trained neural networks scales as a power-law $L propto N-alpha$ in the number of network parameters $N$. The scaling law can be explained if neural models are effectively just performing regression on a data manifold of intrinsic dimension $d$. This simple theory predicts that the scaling exponents $alpha approx 4/d$ for cross-entropy and mean-squared error losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T19:16:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.