The Thinking Spectrum: An Empirical Study of Tunable Reasoning in LLMs through Model Merging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22034v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 01:57:53 GMT
• Title: The Thinking Spectrum: An Empirical Study of Tunable Reasoning in LLMs through Model Merging
• Authors: Xiaochong Lan, Yu Zheng, Shiteng Cao, Yong Li,
• Abstract summary: We present a large-scale empirical study evaluating a range of model merging techniques across multiple reasoning benchmarks.<n>Our findings reveal that model merging offers an effective and controllable method for calibrating the trade-off between reasoning accuracy and token efficiency.<n>Our study provides the first comprehensive analysis of this tunable space, offering practical guidelines for creating LLMs with specific reasoning profiles.
• Score: 8.930191971732649
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing demand for large language models (LLMs) with tunable reasoning capabilities in many real-world applications highlights a critical need for methods that can efficiently produce a spectrum of models balancing reasoning depth and computational cost. Model merging has emerged as a promising, training-free technique to address this challenge by arithmetically combining the weights of a general-purpose model with a specialized reasoning model. While various merging techniques exist, their potential to create a spectrum of models with fine-grained control over reasoning abilities remains largely unexplored. This work presents a large-scale empirical study evaluating a range of model merging techniques across multiple reasoning benchmarks. We systematically vary merging strengths to construct accuracy-efficiency curves, providing the first comprehensive view of the tunable performance landscape. Our findings reveal that model merging offers an effective and controllable method for calibrating the trade-off between reasoning accuracy and token efficiency, even when parent models have highly divergent weight spaces. Crucially, we identify instances of Pareto Improvement, where a merged model achieves both higher accuracy and lower token consumption than one of its parents. Our study provides the first comprehensive analysis of this tunable space, offering practical guidelines for creating LLMs with specific reasoning profiles to meet diverse application demands.

Related papers

• The Law of Multi-Model Collaboration: Scaling Limits of Model Ensembling for Large Language Models [54.51795784459866]
  We propose a theoretical framework of performance scaling for multi-model collaboration.<n>We show that multi-model systems follow a power-law scaling with respect to the total parameter count.<n> ensembles of heterogeneous model families achieve better performance scaling than those formed within a single model family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T09:55:12Z)
• An Integrated Fusion Framework for Ensemble Learning Leveraging Gradient Boosting and Fuzzy Rule-Based Models [59.13182819190547]
  Fuzzy rule-based models excel in interpretability and have seen widespread application across diverse fields.<n>They face challenges such as complex design specifications and scalability issues with large datasets.<n>This paper proposes an Integrated Fusion Framework that merges the strengths of both paradigms to enhance model performance and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T10:28:23Z)
• Merge and Guide: Unifying Model Merging and Guided Decoding for Controllable Multi-Objective Generation [49.98025799046136]
  We introduce Merge-And-GuidE, a two-stage framework that leverages model merging for guided decoding.<n>In Stage 1, MAGE resolves a compatibility problem between the guidance and base models.<n>In Stage 2, we merge explicit and implicit value models into a unified guidance proxy, which then steers the decoding of the base model from Stage 1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T11:10:07Z)
• Don't Overthink It: A Survey of Efficient R1-style Large Reasoning Models [49.598776427454176]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have gradually become a research hotspot due to their outstanding performance in handling complex tasks.<n>However, with the widespread application of these models, the problem of overthinking has gradually emerged.<n>Various efficient reasoning methods have been proposed, aiming to reduce the length of reasoning paths without compromising model performance and reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:54:31Z)
• Beyond Templates: Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Demonstrations via Feasibility-Aware Exploration [15.711365331854614]
  We introduce Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Trajectories (DART), a novel data adaptation framework.<n>Instead of uniformly imitating expert steps, DART employs a selective imitation strategy guided by step-wise adaptability estimation.<n>We validate DART across multiple reasoning benchmarks and model scales, demonstrating that it significantly improves generalization and data efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T04:08:11Z)
• LARES: Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation [96.26996622771593]
  We present LARES, a novel and scalable LAtent REasoning framework for Sequential recommendation.<n>Our proposed approach employs a recurrent architecture that allows flexible expansion of reasoning depth without increasing parameter complexity.<n>Our framework exhibits seamless compatibility with existing advanced models, further improving their recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:22:54Z)
• Modèles de Substitution pour les Modèles à base d'Agents : Enjeux, Méthodes et Applications [0.0]
  Agent-based models (ABM) are widely used to study emergent phenomena arising from local interactions.<n>The complexity of ABM limits their feasibility for real-time decision-making and large-scale scenario analysis.<n>To address these limitations, surrogate models offer an efficient alternative by learning approximations from sparse simulation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T08:55:33Z)
• Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning Preferences [53.47675666475273]
  Current Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in general reasoning yet struggle with specialized tasks requiring proprietary or domain-specific knowledge.<n>We propose a collaborative framework that pairs a specialized weak model with a general strong model.<n>We find that the collaboration significantly outperforms each model alone by leveraging complementary strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T15:57:33Z)
• On the Reasoning Capacity of AI Models and How to Quantify It [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have intensified the debate surrounding the fundamental nature of their reasoning capabilities.<n>While achieving high performance on benchmarks such as GPQA and MMLU, these models exhibit limitations in more complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel phenomenological approach that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics to probe the underlying mechanisms of model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T16:58:18Z)
• Investigating the Impact of Model Complexity in Large Language Models [3.7919508292745676]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) based on the pre-trained fine-tuning paradigm have become pivotal in solving natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we focus on autoregressive LLMs and propose to employ Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to model them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T13:53:44Z)
• Fine-tuning large language models for domain adaptation: Exploration of training strategies, scaling, model merging and synergistic capabilities [4.389938747401259]
  This work explores the effects of fine-tuning strategies on Large Language Models (LLMs) in domains such as materials science and engineering. We find that the merging of multiple fine-tuned models can lead to the emergence of capabilities that surpass the individual contributions of the parent models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T11:49:53Z)
• Boosting the Power of Small Multimodal Reasoning Models to Match Larger Models with Self-Consistency Training [49.3242278912771]
  Multimodal reasoning is a challenging task that requires models to reason across multiple modalities to answer questions. Existing approaches have made progress by incorporating language and visual modalities into a two-stage reasoning framework. We propose MC-CoT, a self-consistency training strategy that generates multiple rationales and answers, subsequently selecting the most accurate through a voting process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T17:09:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.