Detecting (Un)answerability in Large Language Models with Linear Directions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22449v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 15:04:32 GMT
• Title: Detecting (Un)answerability in Large Language Models with Linear Directions
• Authors: Maor Juliet Lavi, Tova Milo, Mor Geva,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) often respond confidently to questions even when they lack the necessary information, leading to hallucinated answers.<n>We study the problem of (un)answerability detection, focusing on extractive question answering (QA)<n>We propose a simple approach for identifying a direction in the model's activation space that captures unanswerability and uses it for classification.
• Score: 28.195817689912705
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often respond confidently to questions even when they lack the necessary information, leading to hallucinated answers. In this work, we study the problem of (un)answerability detection, focusing on extractive question answering (QA) where the model should determine if a passage contains sufficient information to answer a given question. We propose a simple approach for identifying a direction in the model's activation space that captures unanswerability and uses it for classification. This direction is selected by applying activation additions during inference and measuring their impact on the model's abstention behavior. We show that projecting hidden activations onto this direction yields a reliable score for (un)answerability classification. Experiments on two open-weight LLMs and four extractive QA benchmarks show that our method effectively detects unanswerable questions and generalizes better across datasets than existing prompt-based and classifier-based approaches. Moreover, the obtained directions extend beyond extractive QA to unanswerability that stems from factors, such as lack of scientific consensus and subjectivity. Last, causal interventions show that adding or ablating the directions effectively controls the abstention behavior of the model.

Related papers

• Right Answer, Wrong Score: Uncovering the Inconsistencies of LLM Evaluation in Multiple-Choice Question Answering [78.89231943329885]
  Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) is widely used to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We show that multiple factors can significantly impact the reported performance of LLMs.<n>We analyze whether existing answer extraction methods are aligned with human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T08:45:03Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval Augmented Question Answering [45.573346610161195]
  We propose to quantify the uncertainty of a QA model via estimating the utility of the passages it is provided with.<n>We train a lightweight neural model to predict passage utility for a target QA model and show that while simple information theoretic metrics can predict answer correctness up to a certain extent, our approach efficiently approximates or outperforms more expensive sampling-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T11:24:52Z)
• SUGAR: Leveraging Contextual Confidence for Smarter Retrieval [28.552283701883766]
  We introduce Semantic Uncertainty Guided Adaptive Retrieval (SUGAR)<n>We leverage context-based entropy to actively decide whether to retrieve and to further determine between single-step and multi-step retrieval.<n>Our empirical results show that selective retrieval guided by semantic uncertainty estimation improves the performance across diverse question answering tasks, as well as achieves a more efficient inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T01:24:59Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance.<n>We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• LLM Uncertainty Quantification through Directional Entailment Graph and Claim Level Response Augmentation [5.255129053741665]
  Large language models (LLMs) have showcased superior capabilities in sophisticated tasks across various domains, stemming from basic question-answer (QA) This paper presents a novel way to evaluate the uncertainty that captures the directional instability, by constructing a directional graph from entailment probabilities. We also provide a way to incorporate the existing work's semantics uncertainty with our proposed layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T06:11:30Z)
• Don't Just Say "I don't know"! Self-aligning Large Language Models for Responding to Unknown Questions with Explanations [70.6395572287422]
  Self-alignment method is capable of not only refusing to answer but also providing explanation to the unanswerability of unknown questions. We conduct disparity-driven self-curation to select qualified data for fine-tuning the LLM itself for aligning the responses to unknown questions as desired.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T02:24:36Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Language Modeling for Selective Question Answering [107.47864420630923]
  We present an automatic large language model (LLM) conversion approach that produces uncertainty-aware LLMs. Our approach is model- and data-agnostic, is computationally-efficient, and does not rely on external models or systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T22:47:54Z)
• Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs [58.620269228776294]
  We propose a task-agnostic framework for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question answering, machine translation and natural language inference. We find that intent-sim is robust, demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T00:18:50Z)
• Improving the Reliability of Large Language Models by Leveraging Uncertainty-Aware In-Context Learning [76.98542249776257]
  Large-scale language models often face the challenge of "hallucination" We introduce an uncertainty-aware in-context learning framework to empower the model to enhance or reject its output in response to uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T12:06:53Z)
• Knowledge-Based Counterfactual Queries for Visual Question Answering [0.0]
  We propose a systematic method for explaining the behavior and investigating the robustness of VQA models through counterfactual perturbations. For this reason, we exploit structured knowledge bases to perform deterministic, optimal and controllable word-level replacements targeting the linguistic modality. We then evaluate the model's response against such counterfactual inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T08:00:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.