AI Education in Higher Education: A Taxonomy for Curriculum Reform and the Mission of Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23363v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:22:58 GMT
• Title: AI Education in Higher Education: A Taxonomy for Curriculum Reform and the Mission of Knowledge
• Authors: Tian Zheng,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the most consequential challenges lie at the level of curriculum and disciplinary purpose.<n>We show how disciplines evolve through the interplay of research, curriculum, pedagogy, and faculty expertise.
• Score: 2.1812675955027
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education, yet current debates often feel tangled, mixing concerns about pedagogy, operations, curriculum, and the future of work without a shared framework. This paper offers a first attempt at a taxonomy to organize the diverse narratives of AI education and to inform discipline-based curricular discussions. We place these narratives within the enduring responsibility of higher education: the mission of knowledge. This mission includes not only the preservation and advancement of disciplinary expertise, but also the cultivation of skills and wisdom, i.e., forms of meta-knowledge that encompass judgment, ethics, and social responsibility. For the purpose of this paper's discussion, AI is defined as adaptive, data-driven systems that automate analysis, modeling, and decision-making, highlighting its dual role as enabler and disruptor across disciplines. We argue that the most consequential challenges lie at the level of curriculum and disciplinary purpose, where AI accelerates inquiry but also unsettles expertise and identity. We show how disciplines evolve through the interplay of research, curriculum, pedagogy, and faculty expertise, and why curricular reform is the central lever for meaningful change. Pedagogical innovation offers a strategic and accessible entry point, providing actionable steps that help faculty and students build the expertise needed to engage in deeper curricular rethinking and disciplinary renewal. Within this framing, we suggest that meaningful reform can move forward through structured faculty journeys: from AI literacy to pedagogy, curriculum design, and research integration. The key is to align these journeys with the mission of knowledge, turning the disruptive pressures of AI into opportunities for disciplines to sustain expertise, advance inquiry, and serve society.

Related papers

• Charting the Future of AI-supported Science Education: A Human-Centered Vision [0.9851520275517003]
  The chapter synthesizes developments across five dimensions: educational goals, instructional procedures, learning materials, assessment, and outcomes.<n>We argue that AI offers transformative potential to enrich inquiry, personalize learning, and support teacher practice, but only when guided by Responsible and Ethical Principles (REP)<n>The REP framework, emphasizing fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, and respect for human values, anchors our vision for AI-supported science education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T00:06:00Z)
• The Landscape of AI in Science Education: What is Changing and How to Respond [0.9851520275517003]
  This chapter explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in reshaping the landscape of science education.<n>We highlight how AI-supported tools, such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, automated feedback, and generative content creation, enhance personalization, efficiency, and equity.<n>At the same time, this chapter examines the ethical, social, and pedagogical challenges that arise, particularly issues of fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T23:54:23Z)
• Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency [0.0]
  We are witnessing the rise of a dangerous gap, where a focus on the functional, operational skills of using AI tools is eclipsing the development of critical and ethical reasoning about them.<n>This position paper argues for a systemic shift toward comprehensive AI literacy that centers human agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T15:25:38Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Understanding Teacher Perspectives and Experiences after Deployment of AI Literacy Curriculum in Middle-school Classrooms [12.35885897302579]
  We investigate the experiences of seven teachers following their implementation of modules from the MIT RAICA curriculum. Our analysis suggests that the AI modules expanded our teachers' knowledge in the field. Our teachers advocated their need for better external support when navigating technological resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T05:36:16Z)
• Transdisciplinary AI Education: The Confluence of Curricular and Community Needs in the Instruction of Artificial Intelligence [0.7133676002283578]
  We examine the current state of AI in education and explore the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating this technology into the classroom. This paper delves into the AI program currently in development for Neom Community School and the larger Education, Research, and Innovation Sector in Neom, Saudi Arabia s new megacity under development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T17:26:27Z)
• New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution [2.94944680995069]
  ChatGPT's high performance on standardized academic tests has thrust the topic of artificial intelligence (AI) into the mainstream conversation about the future of education. This research aims to investigate the potential impact of AI on education through review and analysis of the existing literature across three major axes: applications, advantages, and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T08:22:54Z)
• What Students Can Learn About Artificial Intelligence -- Recommendations for K-12 Computing Education [0.0]
  Technological advances in the context of digital transformation are the basis for rapid developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) An increasing number of computer science curricula are being extended to include the topic of AI. This paper presents a curriculum of learning objectives that addresses digital literacy and the societal perspective in particular.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T20:39:43Z)
• Platform-Independent and Curriculum-Oriented Intelligent Assistant for Higher Education [0.0]
  We developed an AI-augmented intelligent educational assistance framework based on a power language model (i.e., GPT-3) The virtual intelligent teaching assistant (TA) system will serve as a voice-enabled helper capable of answering course-specific questions concerning curriculum, logistics and course policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T19:02:01Z)
• An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
  We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
  The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education. A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.