Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Outlier Resilience
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24462v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:42:12 GMT
- Title: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Outlier Resilience
- Abstract summary: We study distributionally robust federated learning with explicit outlier resilience.<n>We reformulate the problem as a tractable Lagrangian penalty optimization, which admits robustness certificates.<n>Building on this reformulation, we propose the distributionally outlier-robust federated learning algorithm and establish its convergence guarantees.
- Score: 8.69285602685459
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without direct data sharing, but its performance can degrade significantly in the presence of data distribution perturbations. Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) provides a principled framework for handling this by optimizing performance against the worst-case distributions within a prescribed ambiguity set. However, existing DRO-based FL methods often overlook the detrimental impact of outliers in local datasets, which can disproportionately bias the learned models. In this work, we study distributionally robust federated learning with explicit outlier resilience. We introduce a novel ambiguity set based on the unbalanced Wasserstein distance, which jointly captures geometric distributional shifts and incorporates a non-geometric Kullback--Leibler penalization to mitigate the influence of outliers. This formulation naturally leads to a challenging min--max--max optimization problem. To enable decentralized training, we reformulate the problem as a tractable Lagrangian penalty optimization, which admits robustness certificates. Building on this reformulation, we propose the distributionally outlier-robust federated learning algorithm and establish its convergence guarantees. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Related papers
- FedOPAL: One-Shot Federated Learning via Analytic Visual Prompt Tuning [5.979900839748232]
This paper proposes a framework for efficient collaboration of large models on the edge.<n>FedOPAL adapts the visual prompts as feature prompts, actively correcting the feature distribution of heterogeneous data to a linearly separable space.<n> Experimental results show that FedOPAL not only significantly outperforms the original analytical methods on several benchmarks, but also achieves accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art iterative methods while maintaining zero server-side training costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-09T11:28:31Z) - Distributionally Robust Optimization with Adversarial Data Contamination [36.409282287280185]
We focus on optimizing Wasserstein-1 DRO objectives for generalized linear models with convex Lipschitz loss functions.<n>Our primary contribution lies in a novel modeling framework that integrates robustness against training data contamination with robustness against distributional shifts.<n>This work establishes the first rigorous guarantees, supported by efficient computation, for learning under the dual challenges of data contamination and distributional shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T18:34:10Z) - Distributionally and Adversarially Robust Logistic Regression via Intersecting Wasserstein Balls [8.720733751119994]
We study the underlying optimization problem, develop efficient solution algorithms, and demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms benchmark approaches on standard datasets.<n>Inspired by the former, we study the Wasserstein DR counterpart of ARO for logistic regression and show it admits a tractable convex optimization reformulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T15:59:37Z) - Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm [14.517103323409307]
Sim-to-real gap represents disparity between training and testing environments.
A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL.
We tackle robust RL via interactive data collection and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T16:40:22Z) - Towards Robust Federated Learning via Logits Calibration on Non-IID Data [49.286558007937856]
Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed management framework based on collaborative model training of distributed devices in edge networks.
Recent studies have shown that FL is vulnerable to adversarial examples, leading to a significant drop in its performance.
In this work, we adopt the adversarial training (AT) framework to improve the robustness of FL models against adversarial example (AE) attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T09:18:29Z) - The Risk of Federated Learning to Skew Fine-Tuning Features and
Underperform Out-of-Distribution Robustness [50.52507648690234]
Federated learning has the risk of skewing fine-tuning features and compromising the robustness of the model.
We introduce three robustness indicators and conduct experiments across diverse robust datasets.
Our approach markedly enhances the robustness across diverse scenarios, encompassing various parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T09:18:51Z) - Relaxed Contrastive Learning for Federated Learning [48.96253206661268]
We propose a novel contrastive learning framework to address the challenges of data heterogeneity in federated learning.
Our framework outperforms all existing federated learning approaches by huge margins on the standard benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-10T04:55:24Z) - Federated Distributionally Robust Optimization for Phase Configuration
of RISs [106.4688072667105]
We study the problem of robust reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided downlink communication over heterogeneous RIS types in a supervised learning setting.
By modeling downlink communication over heterogeneous RIS designs as different workers that learn how to optimize phase configurations in a distributed manner, we solve this distributed learning problem.
Our proposed algorithm requires fewer communication rounds to achieve the same worst-case distribution test accuracy compared to competitive baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-20T07:07:45Z) - Distributionally Robust Learning with Stable Adversarial Training [34.74504615726101]
Machine learning algorithms with empirical risk minimization are vulnerable under distributional shifts.
We propose a novel Stable Adversarial Learning (SAL) algorithm that leverages heterogeneous data sources to construct a more practical uncertainty set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-30T03:05:45Z) - Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional
Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model.
The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data.
Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z) - Stable Adversarial Learning under Distributional Shifts [46.98655899839784]
Machine learning algorithms with empirical risk minimization are vulnerable under distributional shifts.
We propose Stable Adversarial Learning (SAL) algorithm that leverages heterogeneous data sources to construct a more practical uncertainty set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T08:42:34Z) - Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function.
It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.