ACE: Adapting sampling for Counterfactual Explanations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26322v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:31:03 GMT
- Title: ACE: Adapting sampling for Counterfactual Explanations
- Authors: Margarita A. Guerrero, Cristian R. Rojas,
- Abstract summary: Counterfactual Explanations (CFEs) interpret machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to input features needed to change the model's prediction to a desired output.<n>Existing methods are often sample-inefficient, requiring numerous evaluations of a black-box model.<n>We propose Adaptive sampling for Counterfactual Explanations (ACE), a sample-efficient algorithm combining Bayesian estimation and optimization to approximate the decision boundary with fewer queries.
- Score: 1.3406858660972552
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Counterfactual Explanations (CFEs) interpret machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to input features needed to change the model's prediction to a desired output. For classification tasks, CFEs determine how close a given sample is to the decision boundary of a trained classifier. Existing methods are often sample-inefficient, requiring numerous evaluations of a black-box model -- an approach that is both costly and impractical when access to the model is limited. We propose Adaptive sampling for Counterfactual Explanations (ACE), a sample-efficient algorithm combining Bayesian estimation and stochastic optimization to approximate the decision boundary with fewer queries. By prioritizing informative points, ACE minimizes evaluations while generating accurate and feasible CFEs. Extensive empirical results show that ACE achieves superior evaluation efficiency compared to state-of-the-art methods, while maintaining effectiveness in identifying minimal and actionable changes.
Related papers
- Direct Preference Optimization with Rating Information: Practical Algorithms and Provable Gains [67.71020482405343]
We study how to design algorithms that can leverage additional information in the form of rating gap.<n>We present new algorithms that can achieve faster statistical rates than DPO in presence of accurate rating gap information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-31T08:38:21Z) - Constraint-Reduced MILP with Local Outlier Factor Modeling for Plausible Counterfactual Explanations in Credit Approval [0.06999740786886534]
We propose a refined Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation that significantly reduces the number of constraints in the local outlier factor (LOF) objective component.<n>Results show that our approach achieves faster solving times while maintaining explanation quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-23T19:23:08Z) - Exogenous Matching: Learning Good Proposals for Tractable Counterfactual Estimation [1.9662978733004601]
We propose an importance sampling method for tractable and efficient estimation of counterfactual expressions.<n>By minimizing a common upper bound of counterfactual estimators, we transform the variance minimization problem into a conditional distribution learning problem.<n>We validate the theoretical results through experiments under various types and settings of Structural Causal Models (SCMs) and demonstrate the outperformance on counterfactual estimation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T03:08:28Z) - An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences.
We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration.
Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z) - MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximation [80.47072100963017]
We introduce a novel and low-compute algorithm, Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Front (MAP)<n>MAP efficiently identifies a set of scaling coefficients for merging multiple models, reflecting the trade-offs involved.<n>We also introduce Bayesian MAP for scenarios with a relatively low number of tasks and Nested MAP for situations with a high number of tasks, further reducing the computational cost of evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T17:55:25Z) - Fine-grained Retrieval Prompt Tuning [149.9071858259279]
Fine-grained Retrieval Prompt Tuning steers a frozen pre-trained model to perform the fine-grained retrieval task from the perspectives of sample prompt and feature adaptation.
Our FRPT with fewer learnable parameters achieves the state-of-the-art performance on three widely-used fine-grained datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-29T04:10:04Z) - MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual
Explanation [132.77005365032468]
We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE)
In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity.
Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z) - Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based
Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts.
We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models.
We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z) - Model-agnostic and Scalable Counterfactual Explanations via
Reinforcement Learning [0.5729426778193398]
We propose a deep reinforcement learning approach that transforms the optimization procedure into an end-to-end learnable process.
Our experiments on real-world data show that our method is model-agnostic, relying only on feedback from model predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-04T16:54:36Z) - Model-Agnostic Explanations using Minimal Forcing Subsets [11.420687735660097]
We propose a new model-agnostic algorithm to identify a minimal set of training samples that are indispensable for a given model's decision.
Our algorithm identifies such a set of "indispensable" samples iteratively by solving a constrained optimization problem.
Results show that our algorithm is an effective and easy-to-comprehend tool that helps to better understand local model behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-01T22:45:16Z) - Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with
Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models.
In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method.
We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.