Bypassing Prompt Guards in Production with Controlled-Release Prompting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01529v2
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 06:05:50 GMT
- Title: Bypassing Prompt Guards in Production with Controlled-Release Prompting
- Authors: Jaiden Fairoze, Sanjam Garg, Keewoo Lee, Mingyuan Wang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a new attack that circumvents prompt guards, highlighting their limitations.<n>Our method consistently jailbreaks production models while maintaining response quality.<n>This reveals an attack surface inherent to lightweight prompt guards in modern LLM architectures.
- Score: 11.65770031195044
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) advance, ensuring AI safety and alignment is paramount. One popular approach is prompt guards, lightweight mechanisms designed to filter malicious queries while being easy to implement and update. In this work, we introduce a new attack that circumvents such prompt guards, highlighting their limitations. Our method consistently jailbreaks production models while maintaining response quality, even under the highly protected chat interfaces of Google Gemini (2.5 Flash/Pro), DeepSeek Chat (DeepThink), Grok (3), and Mistral Le Chat (Magistral). The attack exploits a resource asymmetry between the prompt guard and the main LLM, encoding a jailbreak prompt that lightweight guards cannot decode but the main model can. This reveals an attack surface inherent to lightweight prompt guards in modern LLM architectures and underscores the need to shift defenses from blocking malicious inputs to preventing malicious outputs. We additionally identify other critical alignment issues, such as copyrighted data extraction, training data extraction, and malicious response leakage during thinking.
Related papers
- Bag of Tricks for Subverting Reasoning-based Safety Guardrails [62.139297207938036]
We present a bag of jailbreak methods that subvert the reasoning-based guardrails.<n>Our attacks span white-, gray-, and black-box settings and range from effortless template manipulations to fully automated optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T16:16:44Z) - MoJE: Mixture of Jailbreak Experts, Naive Tabular Classifiers as Guard for Prompt Attacks [2.873719680183099]
This paper advocates for the significance of jailbreak attack prevention on Large Language Models (LLMs)
We introduce MoJE, a novel guardrail architecture designed to surpass current limitations in existing state-of-the-art guardrails.
MoJE excels in detecting jailbreak attacks while maintaining minimal computational overhead during model inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T10:12:19Z) - HSF: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks with Hidden State Filtering [14.031010511732008]
We propose a jailbreak attack defense strategy based on a Hidden State Filter (HSF)<n>HSF enables the model to preemptively identify and reject adversarial inputs before the inference process begins.<n>It significantly reduces the success rate of jailbreak attacks while minimally impacting responses to benign user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-31T06:50:07Z) - Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs)<n>Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs.<n> Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z) - AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z) - Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Models [92.52448762164926]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.<n>Existing jailbreaking methods are computationally costly.<n>We propose the weak-to-strong jailbreaking attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T18:48:37Z) - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily [51.63085197162279]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are designed to provide useful and safe responses.
adversarial prompts known as 'jailbreaks' can circumvent safeguards.
We propose ReNeLLM, an automatic framework that leverages LLMs themselves to generate effective jailbreak prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T16:02:16Z) - SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks [99.23352758320945]
We propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks on large language models (LLMs)
Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense first randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T17:01:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.