Robust Classification of Oral Cancer with Limited Training Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01547v1
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 00:40:53 GMT
- Title: Robust Classification of Oral Cancer with Limited Training Data
- Authors: Akshay Bhagwan Sonawane, Lena D. Swamikannan, Lakshman Tamil,
- Abstract summary: We propose a hybrid model that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) with Bayesian deep learning for oral cancer classification using small training sets.<n>The proposed model achieved 94% accuracy on a test dataset with a distribution similar to that of the training data, comparable to traditional CNN performance.<n>Confidence analysis revealed that the model exhibits low uncertainty (high confidence) for correctly classified samples and high uncertainty (low confidence) for misclassified samples.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Oral cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers globally, with a particularly high mortality rate in regions lacking adequate healthcare access. Early diagnosis is crucial for reducing mortality; however, challenges persist due to limited oral health programs, inadequate infrastructure, and a shortage of healthcare practitioners. Conventional deep learning models, while promising, often rely on point estimates, leading to overconfidence and reduced reliability. Critically, these models require large datasets to mitigate overfitting and ensure generalizability, an unrealistic demand in settings with limited training data. To address these issues, we propose a hybrid model that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) with Bayesian deep learning for oral cancer classification using small training sets. This approach employs variational inference to enhance reliability through uncertainty quantification. The model was trained on photographic color images captured by smartphones and evaluated on three distinct test datasets. The proposed method achieved 94% accuracy on a test dataset with a distribution similar to that of the training data, comparable to traditional CNN performance. Notably, for real-world photographic image data, despite limitations and variations differing from the training dataset, the proposed model demonstrated superior generalizability, achieving 88% accuracy on diverse datasets compared to 72.94% for traditional CNNs, even with a smaller dataset. Confidence analysis revealed that the model exhibits low uncertainty (high confidence) for correctly classified samples and high uncertainty (low confidence) for misclassified samples. These results underscore the effectiveness of Bayesian inference in data-scarce environments in enhancing early oral cancer diagnosis by improving model reliability and generalizability.
Related papers
- Hybrid Approach for Enhancing Lesion Segmentation in Fundus Images [0.0]
Choroidal nevi are benign pigmented lesions in the eye, with a small risk of transforming into melanoma.<n>Early detection is critical to improving survival rates, but misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to poor outcomes.<n>This paper proposes a novel approach that combines mathematical/clustering segmentation models with insights from U-Net.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T22:10:56Z) - Refining Tuberculosis Detection in CXR Imaging: Addressing Bias in Deep Neural Networks via Interpretability [1.9936075659851882]
We argue that the reliability of deep learning models is limited, even if they can be shown to obtain perfect classification accuracy on the test data.
We show that pre-training a deep neural network on a large-scale proxy task, as well as using mixed objective optimization network (MOON), can improve the alignment of decision foundations between models and experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T06:41:31Z) - MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data
Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion.
It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space.
It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z) - Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under
distribution shifts [49.10233060774818]
We show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models.
We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-18T18:15:38Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Confidence Aware Neural Networks for Skin Cancer Detection [12.300911283520719]
We present three different methods for quantifying uncertainties for skin cancer detection from images.
The obtained results reveal that the predictive uncertainty estimation methods are capable of flagging risky and erroneous predictions.
We also demonstrate that ensemble approaches are more reliable in capturing uncertainties through inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-19T19:21:57Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Many-to-One Distribution Learning and K-Nearest Neighbor Smoothing for
Thoracic Disease Identification [83.6017225363714]
deep learning has become the most powerful computer-aided diagnosis technology for improving disease identification performance.
For chest X-ray imaging, annotating large-scale data requires professional domain knowledge and is time-consuming.
In this paper, we propose many-to-one distribution learning (MODL) and K-nearest neighbor smoothing (KNNS) methods to improve a single model's disease identification performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T02:29:30Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.