Predictively Oriented Posteriors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01915v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 11:33:26 GMT
• Title: Predictively Oriented Posteriors
• Authors: Yann McLatchie, Badr-Eddine Cherief-Abdellatif, David T. Frazier, Jeremias Knoblauch,
• Abstract summary: We advocate a new statistical principle that combines the most desirable aspects of both parameter inference and density estimation.<n>PrO posteriors converge to the predictively optimal model average at rate $n-1/2$.<n>We show that PrO posteriors can be sampled from by evolving particles based on mean field Langevin dynamics.
• Score: 4.135680181585462
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We advocate for a new statistical principle that combines the most desirable aspects of both parameter inference and density estimation. This leads us to the predictively oriented (PrO) posterior, which expresses uncertainty as a consequence of predictive ability. Doing so leads to inferences which predictively dominate both classical and generalised Bayes posterior predictive distributions: up to logarithmic factors, PrO posteriors converge to the predictively optimal model average at rate $n^{-1/2}$. Whereas classical and generalised Bayes posteriors only achieve this rate if the model can recover the data-generating process, PrO posteriors adapt to the level of model misspecification. This means that they concentrate around the true model at rate $n^{1/2}$ in the same way as Bayes and Gibbs posteriors if the model can recover the data-generating distribution, but do \textit{not} concentrate in the presence of non-trivial forms of model misspecification. Instead, they stabilise towards a predictively optimal posterior whose degree of irreducible uncertainty admits an interpretation as the degree of model misspecification -- a sharp contrast to how Bayesian uncertainty and its existing extensions behave. Lastly, we show that PrO posteriors can be sampled from by evolving particles based on mean field Langevin dynamics, and verify the practical significance of our theoretical developments on a number of numerical examples.

Related papers

• Principled Input-Output-Conditioned Post-Hoc Uncertainty Estimation for Regression Networks [1.4671424999873808]
  Uncertainty is critical in safety-sensitive applications but is often omitted from off-the-shelf neural networks due to adverse effects on predictive performance.<n>We propose a theoretically grounded framework for post-hoc uncertainty estimation in regression tasks by fitting an auxiliary model to both original inputs and frozen model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T09:13:27Z)
• Predictive variational inference: Learn the predictively optimal posterior distribution [1.7648680700685022]
  Vanilla variational inference finds an optimal approximation to the Bayesian posterior distribution, but even the exact Bayesian posterior is often not meaningful under model misspecification.<n>We propose predictive variational inference (PVI): a general inference framework that seeks and samples from an optimal posterior density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T19:44:57Z)
• Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
  We present a unifying perspective on recent results on ridge regression.<n>We use the basic tools of random matrix theory and free probability, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.<n>Our results extend and provide a unifying perspective on earlier models of scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z)
• Towards Generalizable and Interpretable Motion Prediction: A Deep Variational Bayes Approach [54.429396802848224]
  This paper proposes an interpretable generative model for motion prediction with robust generalizability to out-of-distribution cases. For interpretability, the model achieves the target-driven motion prediction by estimating the spatial distribution of long-term destinations. Experiments on motion prediction datasets validate that the fitted model can be interpretable and generalizable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T04:16:04Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Flat Seeking Bayesian Neural Networks [32.61417343756841]
  We develop theories, the Bayesian setting, and the variational inference approach for the sharpness-aware posterior. Specifically, the models sampled from our sharpness-aware posterior, and the optimal approximate posterior estimating this sharpness-aware posterior, have better flatness. We conduct experiments by leveraging the sharpness-aware posterior with state-of-the-art Bayesian Neural Networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T11:40:44Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Uncertainty estimation under model misspecification in neural network regression [3.2622301272834524]
  We study the effect of the model choice on uncertainty estimation. We highlight that under model misspecification, aleatoric uncertainty is not properly captured.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T10:18:41Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Quantifying Model Predictive Uncertainty with Perturbation Theory [21.591460685054546]
  We propose a framework for predictive uncertainty quantification of a neural network. We use perturbation theory from quantum physics to formulate a moment decomposition problem. Our approach provides fast model predictive uncertainty estimates with much greater precision and calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T17:55:09Z)
• Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inference [112.58907653042317]
  Particle variational inference (PVI) uses an ensemble of models as an empirical approximation for the posterior distribution. PVI iteratively updates each model with a repulsion force to ensure the diversity of the optimized models. We derive a novel generalization error bound and show that it can be reduced by enhancing the diversity of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T12:13:51Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.