Knowledge-Graph Based RAG System Evaluation Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02549v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 20:36:21 GMT
• Title: Knowledge-Graph Based RAG System Evaluation Framework
• Authors: Sicheng Dong, Vahid Zolfaghari, Nenad Petrovic, Alois Knoll,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) has become a significant research focus.<n>Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) greatly enhances generated content's reliability and relevance.<n> evaluating RAG systems remains a challenging task.
• Score: 27.082302648704708
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) has become a significant research focus and is utilized in various fields, such as text generation and dialog systems. One of the most essential applications of LLM is Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), which greatly enhances generated content's reliability and relevance. However, evaluating RAG systems remains a challenging task. Traditional evaluation metrics struggle to effectively capture the key features of modern LLM-generated content that often exhibits high fluency and naturalness. Inspired by the RAGAS tool, a well-known RAG evaluation framework, we extended this framework into a KG-based evaluation paradigm, enabling multi-hop reasoning and semantic community clustering to derive more comprehensive scoring metrics. By incorporating these comprehensive evaluation criteria, we gain a deeper understanding of RAG systems and a more nuanced perspective on their performance. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we compare its performance with RAGAS scores and construct a human-annotated subset to assess the correlation between human judgments and automated metrics. In addition, we conduct targeted experiments to demonstrate that our KG-based evaluation method is more sensitive to subtle semantic differences in generated outputs. Finally, we discuss the key challenges in evaluating RAG systems and highlight potential directions for future research.

Related papers

• Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
  Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z)
• SGSimEval: A Comprehensive Multifaceted and Similarity-Enhanced Benchmark for Automatic Survey Generation Systems [26.888698710786507]
  SGSimEval is a comprehensive benchmark for Survey Generation with Similarity-Enhanced Evaluation.<n>We introduce human preference metrics that emphasize both inherent quality and similarity to humans.<n>Our experiments reveal that current ASG systems demonstrate human-comparable superiority in outline generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T08:27:58Z)
• Re-ranking Reasoning Context with Tree Search Makes Large Vision-Language Models Stronger [51.01841635655944]
  Recent advancements in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly improved performance in Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks.<n>Existing methods still face challenges, such as the scarcity of knowledge with reasoning examples and erratic responses from retrieved knowledge.<n>We propose a multimodal RAG framework, termed RCTS, which enhances LVLMs by constructing a Reasoning Context-enriched knowledge base and a Tree Search re-ranking method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T14:00:57Z)
• RAG-Zeval: Towards Robust and Interpretable Evaluation on RAG Responses through End-to-End Rule-Guided Reasoning [64.46921169261852]
  RAG-Zeval is a novel end-to-end framework that formulates faithfulness and correctness evaluation as a rule-guided reasoning task.<n>Our approach trains evaluators with reinforcement learning, facilitating compact models to generate comprehensive and sound assessments.<n>Experiments demonstrate RAG-Zeval's superior performance, achieving the strongest correlation with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T14:55:33Z)
• Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has advanced significantly in recent years.<n>RAG complexity poses substantial challenges for systematic evaluation and quality enhancement.<n>This study systematically reviews 63 academic articles to provide a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art RAG evaluation methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T08:22:19Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [29.186229489968564]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has revolutionized natural language processing by integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with external information retrieval.<n> evaluating RAG systems presents unique challenges due to their hybrid architecture that combines retrieval and generation components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T06:39:47Z)
• OmniEval: An Omnidirectional and Automatic RAG Evaluation Benchmark in Financial Domain [62.89809156574998]
  We introduce an omnidirectional and automatic RAG benchmark, OmniEval, in the financial domain.<n>Our benchmark is characterized by its multi-dimensional evaluation framework.<n>Our experiments demonstrate the comprehensiveness of OmniEval, which includes extensive test datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T15:38:42Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Iterative Utility Judgment Framework via LLMs Inspired by Relevance in Philosophy [66.95501113584541]
  We propose an Iterative utiliTy judgm fraEntMework (ITEM) to promote each step in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>RAG's three core components -- relevance ranking derived from retrieval models, utility judgments, and answer generation -- align with Schutz's philosophical system of relevances.<n> Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements of ITEM in utility judgments, ranking, and answer generation upon representative baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T07:52:42Z)
• Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey [13.633909177683462]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T02:33:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.