The power of quantum circuits in sampling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03645v1
- Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2025 03:19:47 GMT
- Title: The power of quantum circuits in sampling
- Authors: Guy Blanc, Caleb Koch, Jane Lange, Carmen Strassle, Li-Yang Tan,
- Abstract summary: We show, relative to a random oracle, that quantum-size circuits can sample distributions that subexponential-size classical circuits cannot approximate.<n>A key ingredient in our proof is a new hardness amplification lemma for the classical query complexity of the Yamakawa-Zhandry (2022) search problem.
- Score: 10.233615909288188
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We give new evidence that quantum circuits are substantially more powerful than classical circuits. We show, relative to a random oracle, that polynomial-size quantum circuits can sample distributions that subexponential-size classical circuits cannot approximate even to TV distance $1-o(1)$. Prior work of Aaronson and Arkhipov (2011) showed such a separation for the case of exact sampling (i.e. TV distance $0$), but separations for approximate sampling were only known for uniform algorithms. A key ingredient in our proof is a new hardness amplification lemma for the classical query complexity of the Yamakawa-Zhandry (2022) search problem. We show that the probability that any family of query algorithms collectively finds $k$ distinct solutions decays exponentially in $k$.
Related papers
- Limitations of Noisy Geometrically Local Quantum Circuits [0.2039123720459736]
We show that noisy quantum circuits with interspersed noise converge to the uniform distribution at $omega(log n)$ depth, where $n$ is the number of qubits.<n>We conjecture that our bound is still loose and that a $Theta(1)$-depth threshold suffices for simulability due to a percolation effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T18:08:23Z) - On verifiable quantum advantage with peaked circuit sampling [9.551919087634522]
We show that getting $1/textpoly(n)$ peakedness from such circuits requires $tau_p = Omega(tau_r/n)0.19)$ with overwhelming probability.
We also give numerical evidence that nontrivial peakedness is possible in this model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T18:00:06Z) - Towards large-scale quantum optimization solvers with few qubits [59.63282173947468]
We introduce a variational quantum solver for optimizations over $m=mathcalO(nk)$ binary variables using only $n$ qubits, with tunable $k>1$.
We analytically prove that the specific qubit-efficient encoding brings in a super-polynomial mitigation of barren plateaus as a built-in feature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T18:59:38Z) - Generalized Hybrid Search and Applications to Blockchain and Hash
Function Security [50.16790546184646]
We first examine the hardness of solving various search problems by hybrid quantum-classical strategies.
We then construct a hybrid quantum-classical search algorithm and analyze its success probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T04:59:02Z) - Simulating Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms: A Polynomial Approach [1.806183113759115]
Large-scale variational quantum algorithms are widely recognized as a potential pathway to achieve quantum advantages.
We present a novel $gammaPPP method based on the integral path of observables back-propagation on paths.
We conduct classical simulations of IBM's zeronoised experimental results on the 127-qubit Eagle processor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T10:42:07Z) - Quantum Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions for All Linear Problems [66.65497337069792]
We study the problem of designing worst-case to average-case reductions for quantum algorithms.
We provide an explicit and efficient transformation of quantum algorithms that are only correct on a small fraction of their inputs into ones that are correct on all inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-06T22:01:49Z) - A single $T$-gate makes distribution learning hard [56.045224655472865]
This work provides an extensive characterization of the learnability of the output distributions of local quantum circuits.
We show that for a wide variety of the most practically relevant learning algorithms -- including hybrid-quantum classical algorithms -- even the generative modelling problem associated with depth $d=omega(log(n))$ Clifford circuits is hard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-07T08:04:15Z) - Entanglement and coherence in Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm [58.720142291102135]
Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm allows one to determine a bit string encoded into an oracle.
We analyze in detail the quantum resources in the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm.
We show that in the absence of entanglement, the performance of the algorithm is directly related to the amount of quantum coherence in the initial state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T20:32:36Z) - Classical Sampling of Random Quantum Circuits with Bounded Fidelity [0.5735035463793007]
We present a classical sampling algorithm for producing the probability distribution of any given random quantum circuit.
We classically produced 1 million samples with the fidelity bounded by 0.2%, based on the 20-cycle circuit of the Sycamore 53-qubit quantum chip.
We estimate that for the Zuchongzhi 56-qubit 20-cycle circuit one can produce 1M samples with fidelity 0.066% using the Selene supercomputer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-30T14:51:39Z) - On the Compressed-Oracle Technique, and Post-Quantum Security of Proofs
of Sequential Work [10.43571631715192]
We revisit the so-called compressed oracle technique, introduced by Zhandry for analyzing quantum algorithms in the quantum random oracle model (QROM)
Our main technical contribution is a framework that simplifies the use of the parallel-query generalization of the compressed oracle technique for proving query complexity results.
As a concrete cryptographic application of our techniques, we prove that the "Simple Proofs of Sequential Work" proposed by Cohen and Pietrzak remains secure against quantum attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T12:44:08Z) - Quantum Communication Complexity of Distribution Testing [114.31181206328276]
Two players each receive $t$ samples from one distribution over $[n]$.
The goal is to decide whether their two distributions are equal, or are $epsilon$-far apart.
We show that the quantum communication complexity of this problem is $tildeO$(tepsilon2))$ qubits when distributions have low $l$-norm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T09:05:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.