BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04174v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 12:28:54 GMT
• Title: BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasing
• Authors: Piyush Arora, Navlika Singh, Vasubhya Diwan, Pratik Mazumder,
• Abstract summary: BLADE is a generative debiasing framework that requires no prior knowledge of bias or bias-conflicting samples.<n>We evaluate BLADE on multiple benchmark datasets and show that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
• Score: 2.7352017408152083
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Neural networks have revolutionized numerous fields, yet they remain vulnerable to a critical flaw: the tendency to learn implicit biases, spurious correlations between certain attributes and target labels in training data. These biases are often more prevalent and easier to learn, causing models to rely on superficial patterns rather than task-relevant features necessary for generalization. Existing methods typically rely on strong assumptions, such as prior knowledge of these biases or access to bias-conflicting samples, i.e., samples that contradict spurious correlations and counterbalance bias-aligned samples, samples that conform to these spurious correlations. However, such assumptions are often impractical in real-world settings. We propose BLADE ({B}ias-{L}inked {A}daptive {DE}biasing), a generative debiasing framework that requires no prior knowledge of bias or bias-conflicting samples. BLADE first trains a generative model to translate images across bias domains while preserving task-relevant features. Then, it adaptively refines each image with its synthetic counterpart based on the image's susceptibility to bias. To encourage robust representations, BLADE aligns an image with its bias-translated synthetic counterpart that shares task-relevant features but differs in bias, while misaligning it with samples sharing the same bias. We evaluate BLADE on multiple benchmark datasets and show that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Notably, it exceeds the closest baseline by an absolute margin of around 18% on the corrupted CIFAR-10 dataset under the worst group setting, establishing a new benchmark in bias mitigation and demonstrating its potential for developing more robust deep learning models without explicit supervision.

Related papers

• BiasConnect: Investigating Bias Interactions in Text-to-Image Models [73.76853483463836]
  We introduce BiasConnect, a novel tool designed to analyze and quantify bias interactions in Text-to-Image models.<n>Our method provides empirical estimates that indicate how other bias dimensions shift toward or away from an ideal distribution when a given bias is modified.<n>We demonstrate the utility of BiasConnect for selecting optimal bias mitigation axes, comparing different TTI models on the dependencies they learn, and understanding the amplification of intersectional societal biases in TTI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T19:01:41Z)
• Enhancing Intrinsic Features for Debiasing via Investigating Class-Discerning Common Attributes in Bias-Contrastive Pair [36.221761997349795]
  Deep neural networks rely on bias attributes that are spuriously correlated with a target class in the presence of dataset bias. This paper proposes a method that provides the model with explicit spatial guidance that indicates the region of intrinsic features. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real-world datasets with various levels of bias severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T04:13:14Z)
• Bias-Conflict Sample Synthesis and Adversarial Removal Debias Strategy for Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video [67.24316233946381]
  Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video (TSGV) is troubled by dataset bias issue. We propose the bias-conflict sample synthesis and adversarial removal debias strategy (BSSARD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T09:59:43Z)
• IBADR: an Iterative Bias-Aware Dataset Refinement Framework for Debiasing NLU models [52.03761198830643]
  We propose IBADR, an Iterative Bias-Aware dataset Refinement framework. We first train a shallow model to quantify the bias degree of samples in the pool. Then, we pair each sample with a bias indicator representing its bias degree, and use these extended samples to train a sample generator. In this way, this generator can effectively learn the correspondence relationship between bias indicators and samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T04:50:38Z)
• Echoes: Unsupervised Debiasing via Pseudo-bias Labeling in an Echo Chamber [17.034228910493056]
  This paper presents experimental analyses revealing that the existing biased models overfit to bias-conflicting samples in the training data. We propose a straightforward and effective method called Echoes, which trains a biased model and a target model with a different strategy. Our approach achieves superior debiasing results compared to the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T13:13:18Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Fighting Fire with Fire: Contrastive Debiasing without Bias-free Data via Generative Bias-transformation [31.944147533327058]
  Contrastive Debiasing via Generative Bias-transformation (CDvG) We propose a novel method, Contrastive Debiasing via Generative Bias-transformation (CDvG), which works without explicit bias labels or bias-free samples. Our method demonstrates superior performance compared to prior approaches, especially when bias-free samples are scarce or absent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T07:16:06Z)
• Learning Debiased Models with Dynamic Gradient Alignment and Bias-conflicting Sample Mining [39.00256193731365]
  Deep neural networks notoriously suffer from dataset biases which are detrimental to model robustness, generalization and fairness. We propose a two-stage debiasing scheme to combat against the intractable unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T14:50:10Z)
• BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentation [20.149645246997668]
  Deep neural networks often make decisions based on the spurious correlations inherent in the dataset, failing to generalize in an unbiased data distribution. This paper proposes a novel bias-tailored augmentation-based approach, BiaSwap, for learning debiased representation without requiring supervision on the bias type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-23T08:35:26Z)
• Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation [19.348340314001756]
  This paper presents an empirical analysis revealing that training with "diverse" bias-conflicting samples is crucial for debiasing. We propose a novel feature-level data augmentation technique in order to synthesize diverse bias-conflicting samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-03T08:03:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.