Do Superpixel Segmentation Methods Influence Deforestation Image Classification?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04645v1
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:46:17 GMT
- Title: Do Superpixel Segmentation Methods Influence Deforestation Image Classification?
- Authors: Hugo Resende, Fabio A. Faria, Eduardo B. Neto, Isabela Borlido, Victor Sundermann, Silvio Jamil F. Guimarães, Álvaro L. Fazenda,
- Abstract summary: The ForestEyes project combines citizen science and machine learning to detect deforestation in tropical forests.<n>Traditionally, the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm is adopted as the segmentation method.<n>Recent studies have indicated that other superpixel-based methods outperform SLIC in remote sensing image segmentation.
- Score: 0.47744506020270405
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Image segmentation is a crucial step in various visual applications, including environmental monitoring through remote sensing. In the context of the ForestEyes project, which combines citizen science and machine learning to detect deforestation in tropical forests, image segments are used for labeling by volunteers and subsequent model training. Traditionally, the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm is adopted as the segmentation method. However, recent studies have indicated that other superpixel-based methods outperform SLIC in remote sensing image segmentation, and might suggest that they are more suitable for the task of detecting deforested areas. In this sense, this study investigated the impact of the four best segmentation methods, together with SLIC, on the training of classifiers for the target application. Initially, the results showed little variation in performance among segmentation methods, even when selecting the top five classifiers using the PyCaret AutoML library. However, by applying a classifier fusion approach (ensemble of classifiers), noticeable improvements in balanced accuracy were observed, highlighting the importance of both the choice of segmentation method and the combination of machine learning-based models for deforestation detection tasks.
Related papers
- Visual Prompt Selection for In-Context Learning Segmentation [77.15684360470152]
In this paper, we focus on rethinking and improving the example selection strategy.
We first demonstrate that ICL-based segmentation models are sensitive to different contexts.
Furthermore, empirical evidence indicates that the diversity of contextual prompts plays a crucial role in guiding segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-14T15:02:54Z) - Auxiliary Tasks Enhanced Dual-affinity Learning for Weakly Supervised
Semantic Segmentation [79.05949524349005]
We propose AuxSegNet+, a weakly supervised auxiliary learning framework to explore the rich information from saliency maps.
We also propose a cross-task affinity learning mechanism to learn pixel-level affinities from the saliency and segmentation feature maps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T10:03:21Z) - Pixel-Level Clustering Network for Unsupervised Image Segmentation [3.69853388955692]
We present a pixel-level clustering framework for segmenting images into regions without using ground truth annotations.
We also propose a training strategy that utilizes intra-consistency within each superpixel, inter-similarity/dissimilarity between neighboring superpixels, and structural similarity between images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T23:06:29Z) - Self-Correlation and Cross-Correlation Learning for Few-Shot Remote
Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation [27.59330408178435]
Few-shot remote sensing semantic segmentation aims at learning to segment target objects from a query image.
We propose a Self-Correlation and Cross-Correlation Learning Network for the few-shot remote sensing image semantic segmentation.
Our model enhances the generalization by considering both self-correlation and cross-correlation between support and query images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-11T21:53:34Z) - High-fidelity Pseudo-labels for Boosting Weakly-Supervised Segmentation [17.804090651425955]
Image-level weakly-supervised segmentation (WSSS) reduces the usually vast data annotation cost by surrogate segmentation masks during training.
Our work is based on two techniques for improving CAMs; importance sampling, which is a substitute for GAP, and the feature similarity loss.
We reformulate both techniques based on binomial posteriors of multiple independent binary problems.
This has two benefits; their performance is improved and they become more general, resulting in an add-on method that can boost virtually any WSSS method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T17:43:57Z) - AF$_2$: Adaptive Focus Framework for Aerial Imagery Segmentation [86.44683367028914]
Aerial imagery segmentation has some unique challenges, the most critical one among which lies in foreground-background imbalance.
We propose Adaptive Focus Framework (AF$), which adopts a hierarchical segmentation procedure and focuses on adaptively utilizing multi-scale representations.
AF$ has significantly improved the accuracy on three widely used aerial benchmarks, as fast as the mainstream method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T10:14:45Z) - Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images for
Tree Species Classification Based on Explanation Methods [1.2074552857379273]
We consider the effectiveness of explanation methods for weakly supervised semantic segmentation using only image-level labels.
Experimental results show that considered explanation techniques are highly relevant for the identification of tree species with weak supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-19T09:32:48Z) - Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentation [184.2905747595058]
Mask classification is sufficiently general to solve both semantic- and instance-level segmentation tasks.
We propose MaskFormer, a simple mask classification model which predicts a set of binary masks.
Our method outperforms both current state-of-the-art semantic (55.6 mIoU on ADE20K) and panoptic segmentation (52.7 PQ on COCO) models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-13T17:59:50Z) - Segmentation of VHR EO Images using Unsupervised Learning [19.00071868539993]
We propose an unsupervised semantic segmentation method that can be trained using just a single unlabeled scene.
The proposed method exploits this property to sample smaller patches from the larger scene.
After unsupervised training on the target image/scene, the model automatically segregates the major classes present in the scene and produces the segmentation map.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T11:42:48Z) - Distribution Alignment: A Unified Framework for Long-tail Visual
Recognition [52.36728157779307]
We propose a unified distribution alignment strategy for long-tail visual recognition.
We then introduce a generalized re-weight method in the two-stage learning to balance the class prior.
Our approach achieves the state-of-the-art results across all four recognition tasks with a simple and unified framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T14:09:53Z) - Towards Interpretable Semantic Segmentation via Gradient-weighted Class
Activation Mapping [71.91734471596432]
We propose SEG-GRAD-CAM, a gradient-based method for interpreting semantic segmentation.
Our method is an extension of the widely-used Grad-CAM method, applied locally to produce heatmaps showing the relevance of individual pixels for semantic segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-26T12:32:40Z) - An Abstraction Model for Semantic Segmentation Algorithms [9.561123408923489]
Semantic segmentation is used in many tasks, such as cancer detection, robot-assisted surgery, satellite image analysis, and self-driving cars.
In this paper, an abstraction model for semantic segmentation offers a comprehensive view of the field.
We compare different approaches and analyze each of the four abstraction blocks' importance in each method's operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-27T05:39:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.