The Bayesian Origin of the Probability Weighting Function in Human Representation of Probabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04698v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 11:10:55 GMT
• Title: The Bayesian Origin of the Probability Weighting Function in Human Representation of Probabilities
• Abstract summary: We present an account of the Probability Weighting Function grounded in rational inference over optimal decoding from noisy neural encoding of quantities.<n>Our results provide a unifying account grounding the human representation of probability in rational inference.
• Score: 9.26085058643199
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the representation of probability in the human mind has been of great interest to understanding human decision making. Classical paradoxes in decision making suggest that human perception distorts probability magnitudes. Previous accounts postulate a Probability Weighting Function that transforms perceived probabilities; however, its motivation has been debated. Recent work has sought to motivate this function in terms of noisy representations of probabilities in the human mind. Here, we present an account of the Probability Weighting Function grounded in rational inference over optimal decoding from noisy neural encoding of quantities. We show that our model accurately accounts for behavior in a lottery task and a dot counting task. It further accounts for adaptation to a bimodal short-term prior. Taken together, our results provide a unifying account grounding the human representation of probability in rational inference.

Related papers

• A Unifying Perspective on Probabilities as Model Predictions [0.27689558531442177]
  We argue that every probability is the output of a emphprediction method.<n>We show that even supposedly objective ones are model-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T08:07:09Z)
• Robot Pouring: Identifying Causes of Spillage and Selecting Alternative Action Parameters Using Probabilistic Actual Causation [0.0]
  We investigate the use of probabilistic actual causation to determine whether a factor is the cause of an observed undesired outcome.<n>We show how the actual causation probabilities can be used to find alternative actions to change the outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T15:16:52Z)
• Gaussian Mixture Models for Affordance Learning using Bayesian Networks [50.18477618198277]
  Affordances are fundamental descriptors of relationships between actions, objects and effects. This paper approaches the problem of an embodied agent exploring the world and learning these affordances autonomously from its sensory experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T22:05:45Z)
• Human Trajectory Forecasting with Explainable Behavioral Uncertainty [63.62824628085961]
  Human trajectory forecasting helps to understand and predict human behaviors, enabling applications from social robots to self-driving cars. Model-free methods offer superior prediction accuracy but lack explainability, while model-based methods provide explainability but cannot predict well. We show that BNSP-SFM achieves up to a 50% improvement in prediction accuracy, compared with 11 state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T16:45:21Z)
• Calibration of Quantum Decision Theory: Aversion to Large Losses and Predictability of Probabilistic Choices [0.0]
  We present the first calibration of quantum decision theory (QDT) to a dataset of binary risky choice. We use a probabilistic choice formulation in the simplest form without model assumption or adjustable parameters. The results of the paper can find applications both in the prediction of choice of human decision makers as well as for organizing the operation of artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T15:46:26Z)
• Semantic Strengthening of Neuro-Symbolic Learning [85.6195120593625]
  Neuro-symbolic approaches typically resort to fuzzy approximations of a probabilistic objective. We show how to compute this efficiently for tractable circuits. We test our approach on three tasks: predicting a minimum-cost path in Warcraft, predicting a minimum-cost perfect matching, and solving Sudoku puzzles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T00:04:22Z)
• Reconciling Individual Probability Forecasts [78.0074061846588]
  We show that two parties who agree on the data cannot disagree on how to model individual probabilities. We conclude that although individual probabilities are unknowable, they are contestable via a computationally and data efficient process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T20:20:35Z)
• A Logic-based Tractable Approximation of Probability [0.0]
  We identify the conditions under which propositional probability functions can be approximated by a hierarchy of depth-bounded Belief functions. We show that our approximations of probability lead to uncertain reasoning which, under the usual assumptions in the field, qualifies as tractable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T13:25:12Z)
• The intersection probability: betting with probability intervals [7.655239948659381]
  We propose the use of the intersection probability, a transform derived originally for belief functions in the framework of the geometric approach to uncertainty. We outline a possible decision making framework for probability intervals, analogous to the Transferable Belief Model for belief functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T17:35:06Z)
• Probabilistic Contrastive Loss for Self-Supervised Learning [25.097498223895016]
  This paper proposes a probabilistic contrastive loss function for self-supervised learning. Some intriguing properties of the proposed loss function are empirically demonstrated, which agree with human-like predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T23:41:52Z)
• Probabilistic Human Motion Prediction via A Bayesian Neural Network [71.16277790708529]
  We propose a probabilistic model for human motion prediction in this paper. Our model could generate several future motions when given an observed motion sequence. We extensively validate our approach on a large scale benchmark dataset Human3.6m.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T09:05:33Z)
• Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
  Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.