Robot Pouring: Identifying Causes of Spillage and Selecting Alternative Action Parameters Using Probabilistic Actual Causation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09395v3
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:21:40 GMT
• Title: Robot Pouring: Identifying Causes of Spillage and Selecting Alternative Action Parameters Using Probabilistic Actual Causation
• Abstract summary: We investigate the use of probabilistic actual causation to determine whether a factor is the cause of an observed undesired outcome.<n>We show how the actual causation probabilities can be used to find alternative actions to change the outcome.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In everyday life, we perform tasks (e.g., cooking or cleaning) that involve a large variety of objects and goals. When confronted with an unexpected or unwanted outcome, we take corrective actions and try again until achieving the desired result. The reasoning performed to identify a cause of the observed outcome and to select an appropriate corrective action is a crucial aspect of human reasoning for successful task execution. Central to this reasoning is the assumption that a factor is responsible for producing the observed outcome. In this paper, we investigate the use of probabilistic actual causation to determine whether a factor is the cause of an observed undesired outcome. Furthermore, we show how the actual causation probabilities can be used to find alternative actions to change the outcome. We apply the probabilistic actual causation analysis to a robot pouring task. When spillage occurs, the analysis indicates whether a task parameter is the cause and how it should be changed to avoid spillage. The analysis requires a causal graph of the task and the corresponding conditional probability distributions. To fulfill these requirements, we perform a complete causal modeling procedure (i.e., task analysis, definition of variables, determination of the causal graph structure, and estimation of conditional probability distributions) using data from a realistic simulation of the robot pouring task, covering a large combinatorial space of task parameters. Based on the results, we discuss the implications of the variables' representation and how the alternative actions suggested by the actual causation analysis would compare to the alternative solutions proposed by a human observer. The practical use of the analysis of probabilistic actual causation to select alternative action parameters is demonstrated.

Related papers

• Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviors [61.92704516732144]
  We show that the most robust features for correctness prediction are those that play a distinctive causal role in the model's behavior.<n>We propose two methods that leverage causal mechanisms to predict the correctness of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T00:31:39Z)
• SNAP: Sequential Non-Ancestor Pruning for Targeted Causal Effect Estimation With an Unknown Graph [5.828668695854935]
  We focus on identifying causal effects between target variables in a computationally and statistically efficient way.<n>We show that definite non-ancestors of the targets are unnecessary to learn causal relations between the targets and to identify efficient adjustments sets.<n>Our results on synthetic and real data show that both approaches substantially reduce the number of independence tests and the computation time without compromising the quality of causal effect estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T16:20:57Z)
• What is causal about causal models and representations? [5.128695263114213]
  Causal Bayesian networks are 'causal' models since they make predictions about interventional distributions.<n>To connect such causal model predictions to real-world outcomes, we must determine which actions in the world correspond to which interventions in the model.<n>We introduce a formal framework to make such requirements for different interpretations of actions as interventions precise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:35:21Z)
• Subjective Causality [14.440599230549443]
  We represent causality using causal models (also called structural equations models) We show that it is possible to understand and identify a decision maker's subjective causal judgements by observing her preferences over interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T11:36:38Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Linking a predictive model to causal effect estimation [21.869233469885856]
  This paper first tackles the challenge of estimating the causal effect of any feature (as the treatment) on the outcome w.r.t. a given instance. The theoretical results naturally link a predictive model to causal effect estimations and imply that a predictive model is causally interpretable. We use experiments to demonstrate that various types of predictive models, when satisfying the conditions identified in this paper, can estimate the causal effects of features as accurately as state-of-the-art causal effect estimation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T13:08:16Z)
• Bounding Counterfactuals under Selection Bias [60.55840896782637]
  We propose a first algorithm to address both identifiable and unidentifiable queries. We prove that, in spite of the missingness induced by the selection bias, the likelihood of the available data is unimodal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T10:33:10Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Trying to Outrun Causality with Machine Learning: Limitations of Model Explainability Techniques for Identifying Predictive Variables [7.106986689736828]
  We show that machine learning algorithms are not as flexible as they might seem, and are instead incredibly sensitive to the underling causal structure in the data. We provide some alternative recommendations for researchers wanting to explore the data for important variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-20T17:48:54Z)
• Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities [80.37857025201036]
  Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T22:15:56Z)
• Variance Minimization in the Wasserstein Space for Invariant Causal Prediction [72.13445677280792]
  In this work, we show that the approach taken in ICP may be reformulated as a series of nonparametric tests that scales linearly in the number of predictors. Each of these tests relies on the minimization of a novel loss function that is derived from tools in optimal transport theory. We prove under mild assumptions that our method is able to recover the set of identifiable direct causes, and we demonstrate in our experiments that it is competitive with other benchmark causal discovery algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T22:30:47Z)
• Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
  Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified. We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.