Code-Switching In-Context Learning for Cross-Lingual Transfer of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05678v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:35:42 GMT
• Title: Code-Switching In-Context Learning for Cross-Lingual Transfer of Large Language Models
• Authors: Haneul Yoo, Jiho Jin, Kyunghyun Cho, Alice Oh,
• Abstract summary: We introduce code-switching in-context learning (CSICL) as a principled and robust approach for overcoming the translation barrier during inference.<n>We conduct extensive experiments across 4 LLMs, 6 datasets, and 10 languages, spanning both knowledge-intensive and reasoning-oriented domains.<n>Our results demonstrate CSICL consistently outperforms X-ICL baselines, achieving gains of 3.1%p and 1.9%p in both target and unseen languages.
• Score: 64.54005959758733
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong multilingual abilities, their reliance on English as latent representations creates a translation barrier, where reasoning implicitly depends on internal translation into English. When this process fails, performance in non-English languages deteriorates sharply, limiting the inclusiveness of LLM-based applications. Existing cross-lingual in-context learning (X-ICL) methods primarily leverage monolingual demonstrations, often failing to mitigate this barrier and instead reinforcing it. In this work, we introduce code-switching in-context learning (CSICL), a simple yet effective prompting strategy that progressively transitions from a target language to English within demonstrations and instruction to facilitate their latent reasoning in English. By explicitly scaffolding the reasoning process through controlled code-switching, CSICL acts as an implicit linguistic bridge that enhances cross-lingual alignment and reduces reliance on the translation barrier. We conduct extensive experiments across 4 LLMs, 6 datasets, and 10 languages, spanning both knowledge-intensive and reasoning-oriented domains. Our results demonstrate that CSICL consistently outperforms X-ICL baselines, achieving gains of 3.1%p and 1.9%p in both target and unseen languages, respectively. The improvement is even more pronounced in low-resource settings, with gains of 14.7% in target and 5.3% in unseen languages. These findings establish code-switching as a principled and robust approach for overcoming the translation barrier during inference, moving LLMs toward more equitable and effective multilingual systems.

Related papers

• Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning Capability of LLMs and LVLMs through Representation Engineering [44.596434537567916]
  We propose a training-free inference-time method to enhance Multilingual Reasoning capabilities via Representation Engineering (MRRE)<n>MRRE consistently enhances non-English reasoning by an average gain of 5.48% and up to 7.54% in low-resource languages (Thai and Swahili)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T14:40:27Z)
• Language Surgery in Multilingual Large Language Models [32.77326546076424]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across tasks and languages.<n>This paper investigates the naturally emerging representation alignment in LLMs, particularly in the middle layers.<n>We propose Inference-Time Language Control (ITLC) to enable precise cross-lingual language control and mitigate language confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T11:09:50Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• Cross-Lingual Consistency: A Novel Inference Framework for Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models [10.231866835957538]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) has emerged as a critical mechanism for enhancing reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose the Cross-Lingual Consistency (CLC) framework, which integrates multilingual reasoning paths through majority voting to elevate LLMs' reasoning capabilities.<n> Empirical evaluations on the CMATH dataset reveal CLC's superiority over the conventional self-consistency method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T16:09:39Z)
• EMCee: Improving Multilingual Capability of LLMs via Bridging Knowledge and Reasoning with Extracted Synthetic Multilingual Context [6.612630497074871]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive progress across a wide range of tasks.<n> heavy reliance on English-centric training data leads to significant performance degradation in non-English languages.<n>We propose EMCee, a framework that enhances the multilingual capabilities of LLMs by explicitly extracting and utilizing query-relevant knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T06:05:34Z)
• Enhancing Non-English Capabilities of English-Centric Large Language Models through Deep Supervision Fine-Tuning [42.166438218926274]
  We introduce a deep supervision fine-tuning method (DFT) that incorporates additional supervision in the internal layers of the model to guide its workflow.<n>Our method guides the model to not only consider the final generated result when processing non-English inputs but also ensure the accuracy of internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:59:32Z)
• Bridging the Language Gaps in Large Language Models with Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Intervention [71.12193680015622]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. LLMs exhibit significant performance gaps among different languages. We propose Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Intervention (INCLINE) to overcome these limitations without incurring significant costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T11:23:03Z)
• Lens: Rethinking Multilingual Enhancement for Large Language Models [70.85065197789639]
  We propose Lens, a novel approach to enhance multilingual capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>Lens operates on two subspaces: the language-agnostic subspace, where it aligns target languages with the central language to inherit strong semantic representations, and the language-specific subspace, where it separates target and central languages to preserve linguistic specificity.<n>Lens significantly improves multilingual performance while maintaining the model's English proficiency, achieving better results with less computational cost compared to existing post-training approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T08:51:30Z)
• Analyzing and Adapting Large Language Models for Few-Shot Multilingual NLU: Are We There Yet? [82.02076369811402]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT), supervised instruction tuning (SIT) and in-context learning (ICL) are three alternative, de facto standard approaches to few-shot learning. We present an extensive and systematic comparison of the three approaches, testing them on 6 high- and low-resource languages, three different NLU tasks, and a myriad of language and domain setups. Our observations show that supervised instruction tuning has the best trade-off between performance and resource requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T10:48:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.