Prakriti200: A Questionnaire-Based Dataset of 200 Ayurvedic Prakriti Assessments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06262v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 16:47:51 GMT
• Title: Prakriti200: A Questionnaire-Based Dataset of 200 Ayurvedic Prakriti Assessments
• Abstract summary: This dataset provides responses to a standardized, bilingual (English-Hindi) Prakriti Assessment Questionnaire.<n>The questionnaire consists of 24 multiple-choice items covering body features, appetite, sleep patterns, energy levels, and temperament.<n>All questions are mandatory and neutrally phrased to minimize bias, and dosha labels (Vata, Pitta, Kapha) are hidden from participants.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This dataset provides responses to a standardized, bilingual (English-Hindi) Prakriti Assessment Questionnaire designed to evaluate the physical, physiological, and psychological characteristics of individuals according to classical Ayurvedic principles. The questionnaire consists of 24 multiple-choice items covering body features, appetite, sleep patterns, energy levels, and temperament. It was developed following AYUSH/CCRAS guidelines to ensure comprehensive and accurate data collection. All questions are mandatory and neutrally phrased to minimize bias, and dosha labels (Vata, Pitta, Kapha) are hidden from participants. Data were collected via a Google Forms deployment, enabling automated scoring of responses to map individual traits to dosha-specific scores. The resulting dataset provides a structured platform for research in computational intelligence, Ayurvedic studies, and personalized health analytics, supporting analysis of trait distributions, correlations, and predictive modeling. It can also serve as a reference for future Prakriti-based studies and the development of intelligent health applications.

Related papers

• Automated scoring of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire using fine-tuned large language models [0.0]
  The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) is commonly used to measure hostile attribution bias.<n>We assessed whether large language models can automate the scoring of AIHQ open-ended responses.<n>Results showed that model-generated ratings aligned with human ratings for both attributions of hostility and aggression responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T21:58:11Z)
• Moving Beyond Medical Exam Questions: A Clinician-Annotated Dataset of Real-World Tasks and Ambiguity in Mental Healthcare [0.0545520830707066]
  We present an expert-created and annotated dataset spanning five critical domains of decision-making in mental healthcare.<n>This dataset is designed to capture the nuanced clinical reasoning and daily ambiguities mental health practitioners encounter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T03:10:16Z)
• Qsnail: A Questionnaire Dataset for Sequential Question Generation [76.616068047362]
  We present the first dataset specifically constructed for the questionnaire generation task, which comprises 13,168 human-written questionnaires. We conduct experiments on Qsnail, and the results reveal that retrieval models and traditional generative models do not fully align with the given research topic and intents. Despite enhancements through the chain-of-thought prompt and finetuning, questionnaires generated by language models still fall short of human-written questionnaires.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:14:10Z)
• Analyzing the contribution of different passively collected data to predict Stress and Depression [1.7638111859993633]
  We analyze the contribution of different passively collected sensor data types to predict daily selfreport stress and PHQ-9 depression score. Our results show that WiFi features (which encode mobility patterns) and Phone Log features (which encode information correlated with sleep patterns) provide significative information for stress and depression prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T15:57:22Z)
• ExpertQA: Expert-Curated Questions and Attributed Answers [51.68314045809179]
  We conduct human evaluation of responses from a few representative systems along various axes of attribution and factuality. We collect expert-curated questions from 484 participants across 32 fields of study, and then ask the same experts to evaluate generated responses to their own questions. The output of our analysis is ExpertQA, a high-quality long-form QA dataset with 2177 questions spanning 32 fields, along with verified answers and attributions for claims in the answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T16:54:34Z)
• Dataset Bias in Human Activity Recognition [57.91018542715725]
  This contribution statistically curates the training data to assess to what degree the physical characteristics of humans influence HAR performance. We evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network on two HAR datasets that vary in the sensors, activities, and recording for time-series HAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T12:33:50Z)
• Learning to Ask Like a Physician [24.15961995052862]
  We present Discharge Summary Clinical Questions (DiSCQ), a newly curated question dataset composed of 2,000+ questions. The questions are generated by medical experts from 100+ MIMIC-III discharge summaries. We analyze this dataset to characterize the types of information sought by medical experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T15:50:54Z)
• Developing patient-driven artificial intelligence based on personal rankings of care decision making steps [0.0]
  Our longitudinal quantitative cross-sectional three-stage study gathered self-ratings for 437 expression statements concerning healthcare situations. Frequencies of the later reordering of rating rankings showed dependencies with ratings given earlier in respect to various interpretation task entities. Our results support building artificial intelligence solutions to address the patient's needs concerning care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T15:45:58Z)
• Vyaktitv: A Multimodal Peer-to-Peer Hindi Conversations based Dataset for Personality Assessment [50.15466026089435]
  We present a novel peer-to-peer Hindi conversation dataset- Vyaktitv. It consists of high-quality audio and video recordings of the participants, with Hinglish textual transcriptions for each conversation. The dataset also contains a rich set of socio-demographic features, like income, cultural orientation, amongst several others, for all the participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T17:44:28Z)
• DeepCoDA: personalized interpretability for compositional health data [58.841559626549376]
  Interpretability allows the domain-expert to evaluate the model's relevance and reliability. In the healthcare setting, interpretable models should implicate relevant biological mechanisms independent of technical factors. We define personalized interpretability as a measure of sample-specific feature attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T05:14:22Z)
• A Revised Generative Evaluation of Visual Dialogue [80.17353102854405]
  We propose a revised evaluation scheme for the VisDial dataset. We measure consensus between answers generated by the model and a set of relevant answers. We release these sets and code for the revised evaluation scheme as DenseVisDial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T13:26:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.