DeepCoDA: personalized interpretability for compositional health data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01392v2
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:46:02 GMT
- Title: DeepCoDA: personalized interpretability for compositional health data
- Authors: Thomas P. Quinn, Dang Nguyen, Santu Rana, Sunil Gupta, Svetha
Venkatesh
- Abstract summary: Interpretability allows the domain-expert to evaluate the model's relevance and reliability.
In the healthcare setting, interpretable models should implicate relevant biological mechanisms independent of technical factors.
We define personalized interpretability as a measure of sample-specific feature attribution.
- Score: 58.841559626549376
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Interpretability allows the domain-expert to directly evaluate the model's
relevance and reliability, a practice that offers assurance and builds trust.
In the healthcare setting, interpretable models should implicate relevant
biological mechanisms independent of technical factors like data
pre-processing. We define personalized interpretability as a measure of
sample-specific feature attribution, and view it as a minimum requirement for a
precision health model to justify its conclusions. Some health data, especially
those generated by high-throughput sequencing experiments, have nuances that
compromise precision health models and their interpretation. These data are
compositional, meaning that each feature is conditionally dependent on all
other features. We propose the Deep Compositional Data Analysis (DeepCoDA)
framework to extend precision health modelling to high-dimensional
compositional data, and to provide personalized interpretability through
patient-specific weights. Our architecture maintains state-of-the-art
performance across 25 real-world data sets, all while producing interpretations
that are both personalized and fully coherent for compositional data.
Related papers
- ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from Videos [86.63174804149216]
ContPhy is a novel benchmark for assessing machine physical commonsense.
We evaluated a range of AI models and found that they still struggle to achieve satisfactory performance on ContPhy.
We also introduce an oracle model (ContPRO) that marries the particle-based physical dynamic models with the recent large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T01:09:21Z) - InterpretCC: Intrinsic User-Centric Interpretability through Global Mixture of Experts [31.738009841932374]
Interpretability for neural networks is a trade-off between three key requirements.
We present InterpretCC, a family of interpretable-by-design neural networks that guarantee human-centric interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T11:55:50Z) - TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic
Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment.
In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials.
We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z) - Evaluation of the Synthetic Electronic Health Records [3.255030588361125]
This work outlines two metrics called Similarity and Uniqueness for sample-wise assessment of synthetic datasets.
We demonstrate the proposed notions with several state-of-the-art generative models to synthesise Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients' electronic health records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-16T22:46:08Z) - Improving Correlation Capture in Generating Imbalanced Data using
Differentially Private Conditional GANs [2.2265840715792735]
We propose DP-CGANS, a differentially private conditional GAN framework consisting of data transformation, sampling, conditioning, and networks training to generate realistic and privacy-preserving data.
We extensively evaluate our model with state-of-the-art generative models on three public datasets and two real-world personal health datasets in terms of statistical similarity, machine learning performance, and privacy measurement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-28T06:47:27Z) - Data-SUITE: Data-centric identification of in-distribution incongruous
examples [81.21462458089142]
Data-SUITE is a data-centric framework to identify incongruous regions of in-distribution (ID) data.
We empirically validate Data-SUITE's performance and coverage guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-17T18:58:31Z) - Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the
complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models.
We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data.
We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z) - Deep Co-Attention Network for Multi-View Subspace Learning [73.3450258002607]
We propose a deep co-attention network for multi-view subspace learning.
It aims to extract both the common information and the complementary information in an adversarial setting.
In particular, it uses a novel cross reconstruction loss and leverages the label information to guide the construction of the latent representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-15T18:46:44Z) - Differentially Private Synthetic Medical Data Generation using
Convolutional GANs [7.2372051099165065]
We develop a differentially private framework for synthetic data generation using R'enyi differential privacy.
Our approach builds on convolutional autoencoders and convolutional generative adversarial networks to preserve some of the critical characteristics of the generated synthetic data.
We demonstrate that our model outperforms existing state-of-the-art models under the same privacy budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-22T01:03:49Z) - Jointly Predicting Job Performance, Personality, Cognitive Ability,
Affect, and Well-Being [42.67003631848889]
We create a benchmark for predictive analysis of individuals from a perspective that integrates physical and physiological behavior, psychological states and traits, and job performance.
We design data mining techniques as benchmark and uses real noisy and incomplete data derived from wearable sensors to predict 19 constructs based on 12 standardized well-validated tests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T14:30:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.