Training Feature Attribution for Vision Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09135v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:37:13 GMT
• Title: Training Feature Attribution for Vision Models
• Authors: Aziz Bacha, Thomas George,
• Abstract summary: Training feature attribution links test predictions to specific regions of specific training images.<n>Experiments on vision datasets show that training feature attribution yields fine-grained, test-specific explanations.
• Score: 0.13685626568919942
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks are often considered opaque systems, prompting the need for explainability methods to improve trust and accountability. Existing approaches typically attribute test-time predictions either to input features (e.g., pixels in an image) or to influential training examples. We argue that both perspectives should be studied jointly. This work explores *training feature attribution*, which links test predictions to specific regions of specific training images and thereby provides new insights into the inner workings of deep models. Our experiments on vision datasets show that training feature attribution yields fine-grained, test-specific explanations: it identifies harmful examples that drive misclassifications and reveals spurious correlations, such as patch-based shortcuts, that conventional attribution methods fail to expose.

Related papers

• How to Probe: Simple Yet Effective Techniques for Improving Post-hoc Explanations [69.72654127617058]
  Post-hoc importance attribution methods are a popular tool for "explaining" Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)<n>In this work we bring forward empirical evidence that challenges this very notion.<n>We discover a strong dependency on and demonstrate that the training details of a pre-trained model's classification layer play a crucial role.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T22:25:11Z)
• Explaining the Unexplained: Revealing Hidden Correlations for Better Interpretability [1.8274323268621635]
  Real Explainer (RealExp) is an interpretability method that decouples the Shapley Value into individual feature importance and feature correlation importance.<n>RealExp enhances interpretability by precisely quantifying both individual feature contributions and their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T10:50:50Z)
• Improving Network Interpretability via Explanation Consistency Evaluation [56.14036428778861]
  We propose a framework that acquires more explainable activation heatmaps and simultaneously increase the model performance. Specifically, our framework introduces a new metric, i.e., explanation consistency, to reweight the training samples adaptively in model learning. Our framework then promotes the model learning by paying closer attention to those training samples with a high difference in explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:20:08Z)
• What Do Deep Saliency Models Learn about Visual Attention? [28.023464783469738]
  We present a novel analytic framework that sheds light on the implicit features learned by saliency models. Our approach decomposes these implicit features into interpretable bases that are explicitly aligned with semantic attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T23:15:57Z)
• Modeling Uncertain Feature Representation for Domain Generalization [49.129544670700525]
  We show that our method consistently improves the network generalization ability on multiple vision tasks. Our methods are simple yet effective and can be readily integrated into networks without additional trainable parameters or loss constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T14:25:02Z)
• Explaining, Evaluating and Enhancing Neural Networks' Learned Representations [2.1485350418225244]
  We show how explainability can be an aid, rather than an obstacle, towards better and more efficient representations. We employ such attributions to define two novel scores for evaluating the informativeness and the disentanglement of latent embeddings. We show that adopting our proposed scores as constraints during the training of a representation learning task improves the downstream performance of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T19:00:01Z)
• Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model Interpretation [0.0]
  We present a novel method for reliably explaining the predictions of neural networks. Our method is built on top of the assumption of smooth landscape in a loss function of the model prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T08:52:11Z)
• Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profiles [69.9674326582747]
  This paper presents a visual framework to investigate neural network models subjected to adversarial examples. We show how observing these elements can quickly pinpoint exploited areas in a model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T13:04:21Z)
• Proactive Pseudo-Intervention: Causally Informed Contrastive Learning For Interpretable Vision Models [103.64435911083432]
  We present a novel contrastive learning strategy called it Proactive Pseudo-Intervention (PPI) PPI leverages proactive interventions to guard against image features with no causal relevance. We also devise a novel causally informed salience mapping module to identify key image pixels to intervene, and show it greatly facilitates model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-06T20:30:26Z)
• Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervision [57.14468881854616]
  We propose an auxiliary training objective that improves the generalization capabilities of neural networks. We use pairs of minimally-different examples with different labels, a.k.a counterfactual or contrasting examples, which provide a signal indicative of the underlying causal structure of the task. Models trained with this technique demonstrate improved performance on out-of-distribution test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T02:47:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.