WUGNECTIVES: Novel Entity Inferences of Language Models from Discourse Connectives
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09556v2
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 02:29:16 GMT
- Title: WUGNECTIVES: Novel Entity Inferences of Language Models from Discourse Connectives
- Abstract summary: We study whether discourse connectives can inform language models about the world.<n>We present WUGNECTIVES, a dataset of 8,880 stimuli that evaluates LMs' inferences about novel entities.<n>We find that tuning an LM to show reasoning behavior yields noteworthy improvements on most connectives.
- Score: 28.171845634282576
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The role of world knowledge has been particularly crucial to predict the discourse connective that marks the discourse relation between two arguments, with language models (LMs) being generally successful at this task. We flip this premise in our work, and instead study the inverse problem of understanding whether discourse connectives can inform LMs about the world. To this end, we present WUGNECTIVES, a dataset of 8,880 stimuli that evaluates LMs' inferences about novel entities in contexts where connectives link the entities to particular attributes. On investigating 17 different LMs at various scales, and training regimens, we found that tuning an LM to show reasoning behavior yields noteworthy improvements on most connectives. At the same time, there was a large variation in LMs' overall performance across connective type, with all models systematically struggling on connectives that express a concessive meaning. Our findings pave the way for more nuanced investigations into the functional role of language cues as captured by LMs. We release WUGNECTIVES at https://github.com/sheffwb/wugnectives.
Related papers
- Farther the Shift, Sparser the Representation: Analyzing OOD Mechanisms in LLMs [100.02824137397464]
We investigate how Large Language Models adapt their internal representations when encountering inputs of increasing difficulty.<n>We reveal a consistent and quantifiable phenomenon: as task difficulty increases, the last hidden states of LLMs become substantially sparser.<n>This sparsity--difficulty relation is observable across diverse models and domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T18:48:15Z) - PragWorld: A Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Local World Model under Minimal Linguistic Alterations and Conversational Dynamics [9.915303686933436]
We evaluate the ability of language models (LMs) to encode and update their internal world model in dyadic conversations.<n>We show that LMs struggle to memorize crucial details, such as tracking entities under linguistic alterations to conversations.<n>We propose a dual-perspective interpretability framework which identifies transformer layers that are useful or harmful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-17T06:17:17Z) - Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.<n>This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z) - Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective [5.769786334333616]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) based applications including automated text generation, question answering, and others.
They face a significant challenge: hallucinations, where models produce plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses.
This paper discusses these open challenges covering state-of-the-art datasets and benchmarks as well as methods for knowledge integration and evaluating hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T16:09:05Z) - C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations.
Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z) - Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs)
Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process.
We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z) - IERL: Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning -- Combining
CrowdSourced Knowledge and Distributed Semantic Representations [11.008412414253662]
Large Language Models (LLMs) encode meanings of words in the form of distributed semantics.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs tend to generate unintended, inconsistent, or wrong texts as outputs.
We propose a novel ensemble learning method, Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning (IERL), that systematically combines LLM and crowdsourced knowledge representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-24T05:02:34Z) - Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating
Injected Knowledge [72.63368052592004]
We study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts)
We find that existing methods for updating knowledge show little propagation of injected knowledge.
Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T17:59:46Z) - Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding
Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning.
This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z) - Empowering Language Models with Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Question
Answering [117.79170629640525]
We propose knOwledge REasOning empowered Language Model (OREO-LM)
OREO-LM consists of a novel Knowledge Interaction Layer that can be flexibly plugged into existing Transformer-based LMs.
We show significant performance gain, achieving state-of-art results in the Closed-Book setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T18:26:26Z) - What BERT Based Language Models Learn in Spoken Transcripts: An
Empirical Study [6.696983725360809]
Language Models (LMs) have been ubiquitously leveraged in various tasks including spoken language understanding (SLU)
In this work, we propose to dissect SLU into three representative properties: speakeral (disfluency, pause, overtalk), channel (conversation-type, turn-tasks) and ASR (insertion, deletion,substitution)
We probe BERT based language models (BERT, RoBERTa) trained on spoken transcripts to investigate its ability to understand multifarious properties in absence of any speech cues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T11:23:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.