Understanding Robust Machine Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heavy-Tailed Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09888v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 21:57:18 GMT
• Title: Understanding Robust Machine Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heavy-Tailed Noise
• Authors: Yunlong Feng, Qiang Wu,
• Abstract summary: We use Huber regression as a close-up example within Tikhonov-regularized risk minimization.<n>We address two central challenges: (i) the breakdown of standard concentration tools under weak moment assumptions, and (ii) the analytical difficulties introduced by unbounded hypothesis spaces.<n>Our study delivers principled rules, extends beyond Huber to other robust losses, and highlights prediction error, not excess risk, as the fundamental lens for analyzing robust learning.
• Score: 10.844819221753042
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate robust nonparametric regression in the presence of heavy-tailed noise, where the hypothesis class may contain unbounded functions and robustness is ensured via a robust loss function $\ell_\sigma$. Using Huber regression as a close-up example within Tikhonov-regularized risk minimization in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS), we address two central challenges: (i) the breakdown of standard concentration tools under weak moment assumptions, and (ii) the analytical difficulties introduced by unbounded hypothesis spaces. Our first message is conceptual: conventional generalization-error bounds for robust losses do not faithfully capture out-of-sample performance. We argue that learnability should instead be quantified through prediction error, namely the $L_2$-distance to the truth $f^\star$, which is $\sigma$-independent and directly reflects the target of robust estimation. To make this workable under unboundedness, we introduce a \emph{probabilistic effective hypothesis space} that confines the estimator with high probability and enables a meaningful bias--variance decomposition under weak $(1+\epsilon)$-moment conditions. Technically, we establish new comparison theorems linking the excess robust risk to the $L_2$ prediction error up to a residual of order $\mathcal{O}(\sigma^{-2\epsilon})$, clarifying the robustness--bias trade-off induced by the scale parameter $\sigma$. Building on this, we derive explicit finite-sample error bounds and convergence rates for Huber regression in RKHS that hold without uniform boundedness and under heavy-tailed noise. Our study delivers principled tuning rules, extends beyond Huber to other robust losses, and highlights prediction error, not excess generalization risk, as the fundamental lens for analyzing robust learning.

Related papers

• Sharp Convergence Rates for Masked Diffusion Models [53.117058231393834]
  We develop a total-variation based analysis for the Euler method that overcomes limitations.<n>Our results relax assumptions on score estimation, improve parameter dependencies, and establish convergence guarantees.<n>Overall, our analysis introduces a direct TV-based error decomposition along the CTMC trajectory and a decoupling-based path-wise analysis for FHS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T00:47:51Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• Stochastic Weakly Convex Optimization Under Heavy-Tailed Noises [55.43924214633558]
  In this paper, we focus on two types of noises: one is sub-Weibull noises, and the other is SsBC noises.<n>Under these two noise assumptions, the in-expectation and high-probability convergence of SFOMs have been studied in the contexts of convex optimization and smooth optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T16:48:45Z)
• Adversarial Robustness of Nonparametric Regression [14.20104019605888]
  We characterize the adversarial robustness in nonparametric regression, assuming the regression function belongs to the second-order Sobolev space.<n>We show that, perhaps surprisingly, the classical smoothing spline estimator, when properly regularized, exhibits robustness against adversarial corruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T00:18:20Z)
• Generalization and Robustness of the Tilted Empirical Risk [17.48212403081267]
  generalization error (risk) of a supervised statistical learning algorithm quantifies its prediction ability on previously unseen data.<n>Inspired by exponential tilting, citetli 2020tilted proposed the it tilted empirical risk (TER) as a non-linear risk metric for machine learning applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T18:31:51Z)
• Robust deep learning from weakly dependent data [0.0]
  This paper considers robust deep learning from weakly dependent observations, with unbounded loss function and unbounded input/output. We derive a relationship between these bounds and $r$, and when the data have moments of any order (that is $r=infty$), the convergence rate is close to some well-known results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T14:25:40Z)
• A Robustness Analysis of Blind Source Separation [91.3755431537592]
  Blind source separation (BSS) aims to recover an unobserved signal from its mixture $X=f(S)$ under the condition that the transformation $f$ is invertible but unknown. We present a general framework for analysing such violations and quantifying their impact on the blind recovery of $S$ from $X$. We show that a generic BSS-solution in response to general deviations from its defining structural assumptions can be profitably analysed in the form of explicit continuity guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T16:30:51Z)
• Stability and Risk Bounds of Iterative Hard Thresholding [41.082982732100696]
  We introduce a novel sparse generalization theory for IHT under the notion of algorithmic stability. We show that IHT with sparsity level $k$ enjoys an $mathcaltilde O(n-1/2sqrtlog(n)log(p))$ rate of convergence in sparse excess risk. Preliminary numerical evidence is provided to confirm our theoretical predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T16:12:56Z)
• Optimal variance-reduced stochastic approximation in Banach spaces [114.8734960258221]
  We study the problem of estimating the fixed point of a contractive operator defined on a separable Banach space. We establish non-asymptotic bounds for both the operator defect and the estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T02:46:57Z)
• Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methods [78.83926562536791]
  We use kernel Hilbert spaces for estimating the value function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov reward process. We derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on the error with explicit dependence on the eigenvalues of the associated kernel operator. We prove minimax lower bounds over sub-classes of MRPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T14:48:20Z)
• A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradient [101.16957584135767]
  Policy gradient (PG) is one of the most popular reinforcement learning (RL) problems. "vanilla" theoretical understanding of PG trajectory is one of the most popular methods for solving RL problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T19:38:17Z)
• Understanding the Under-Coverage Bias in Uncertainty Estimation [58.03725169462616]
  quantile regression tends to emphunder-cover than the desired coverage level in reality. We prove that quantile regression suffers from an inherent under-coverage bias. Our theory reveals that this under-coverage bias stems from a certain high-dimensional parameter estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T06:11:55Z)
• Error bounds in estimating the out-of-sample prediction error using leave-one-out cross validation in high-dimensions [19.439945058410203]
  We study the problem of out-of-sample risk estimation in the high dimensional regime. Extensive empirical evidence confirms the accuracy of leave-one-out cross validation. One technical advantage of the theory is that it can be used to clarify and connect some results from the recent literature on scalable approximate LO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-03T20:07:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.