f-INE: A Hypothesis Testing Framework for Estimating Influence under Training Randomness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10510v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 09:05:47 GMT
• Title: f-INE: A Hypothesis Testing Framework for Estimating Influence under Training Randomness
• Authors: Subhodip Panda, Dhruv Tarsadiya, Shashwat Sourav, Prathosh A. P, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy,
• Abstract summary: We introduce *f-influence* -- a new influence estimation framework grounded in hypothesis testing.<n>We also design a highly efficient algorithm **f**-**IN**fluence **E**stimation (**f-INE**) that computes f-influence **in a single training run.<n>Finally, we scale up f-INE to estimate influence of instruction tuning data on Llama-3.1-8B and show it can reliably detect poisoned samples.
• Score: 13.922293647552303
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Influence estimation methods promise to explain and debug machine learning by estimating the impact of individual samples on the final model. Yet, existing methods collapse under training randomness: the same example may appear critical in one run and irrelevant in the next. Such instability undermines their use in data curation or cleanup since it is unclear if we indeed deleted/kept the correct datapoints. To overcome this, we introduce *f-influence* -- a new influence estimation framework grounded in hypothesis testing that explicitly accounts for training randomness, and establish desirable properties that make it suitable for reliable influence estimation. We also design a highly efficient algorithm **f**-**IN**fluence **E**stimation (**f-INE**) that computes f-influence **in a single training run**. Finally, we scale up f-INE to estimate influence of instruction tuning data on Llama-3.1-8B and show it can reliably detect poisoned samples that steer model opinions, demonstrating its utility for data cleanup and attributing model behavior.

Related papers

• Z0-Inf: Zeroth Order Approximation for Data Influence [47.682602051124235]
  We introduce a highly efficient zeroth-order approximation for estimating the influence of training data.<n>Our approach achieves superior accuracy in estimating self-influence and comparable or improved accuracy in estimating train-test influence for fine-tuned large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T18:30:37Z)
• Revisiting Data Attribution for Influence Functions [13.88866465448849]
  This paper comprehensively reviews the data attribution capability of influence functions in deep learning.<n>We discuss their theoretical foundations, recent algorithmic advances for efficient inverse-Hessian-vector product estimation, and evaluate their effectiveness for data attribution and mislabel detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T11:15:07Z)
• Distributional Training Data Attribution: What do Influence Functions Sample? [25.257922996567178]
  We introduce distributional training data attribution (d-TDA)<n>The goal of d-TDA is to predict how the distribution of model outputs depends upon the dataset.<n>We find that influence functions (IFs) are'secretly distributional'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T21:02:36Z)
• CausalPFN: Amortized Causal Effect Estimation via In-Context Learning [15.645599403885605]
  CausalPFN infers causal effects for new observational datasets out-of-the-box.<n>Our approach achieves superior average performance on heterogeneous and average treatment effect estimation benchmarks.<n>CausalPFN provides calibrated uncertainty estimates to support reliable decision-making based on Bayesian principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T16:31:06Z)
• Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
  This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective.<n>The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning.<n>The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z)
• Impact of Noisy Supervision in Foundation Model Learning [91.56591923244943]
  This paper is the first work to comprehensively understand and analyze the nature of noise in pre-training datasets.<n>We propose a tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise and improve generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:22:41Z)
• The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes [30.30769701138665]
  We introduce and explore the Mirrored Influence Hypothesis, highlighting a reciprocal nature of influence between training and test data. Specifically, it suggests that evaluating the influence of training data on test predictions can be reformulated as an equivalent, yet inverse problem. We introduce a new method for estimating the influence of training data, which requires calculating gradients for specific test samples, paired with a forward pass for each training point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:43:05Z)
• Unlearning Traces the Influential Training Data of Language Models [31.33791825286853]
  This paper presents UnTrac: unlearning traces the influence of a training dataset on the model's performance. We propose a more scalable approach, UnTrac-Inv, which unlearns a test dataset and evaluates the unlearned model on training datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T23:17:31Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating the Label Noise in Pre-training on Downstream Tasks [91.15120211190519]
  This paper aims to understand the nature of noise in pre-training datasets and to mitigate its impact on downstream tasks. We propose a light-weight black-box tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T06:18:15Z)
• Conformal Prediction Under Feedback Covariate Shift for Biomolecular Design [56.86533144730384]
  We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in settings where the training and test data are statistically dependent.<n>As a motivating use case, we demonstrate with several real data sets how our method quantifies uncertainty for the predicted fitness of designed proteins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Efficient Estimation of Influence of a Training Instance [56.29080605123304]
  We propose an efficient method for estimating the influence of a training instance on a neural network model. Our method is inspired by dropout, which zero-masks a sub-network and prevents the sub-network from learning each training instance. We demonstrate that the proposed method can capture training influences, enhance the interpretability of error predictions, and cleanse the training dataset for improving generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T04:31:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.