Making Power Explicable in AI: Analyzing, Understanding, and Redirecting Power to Operationalize Ethics in AI Technical Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10588v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 13:09:22 GMT
• Title: Making Power Explicable in AI: Analyzing, Understanding, and Redirecting Power to Operationalize Ethics in AI Technical Practice
• Authors: Weina Jin, Elise Li Zheng, Ghassan Hamarneh,
• Abstract summary: We first describe the phenomenon (i.e., the "symptoms") of ineffective implementation of AI ethics in explainable AI.<n>From the "symptoms", we diagnose the root cause (i.e., the "disease") being the dysfunction and imbalance of power structures in the sociotechnical system of AI.<n>Based on the understanding of power mechanisms, we propose three interventional recommendations to tackle the root cause.
• Score: 12.114215545709818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The operationalization of ethics in the technical practices of artificial intelligence (AI) is facing significant challenges. To address the problem of ineffective implementation of AI ethics, we present our diagnosis, analysis, and interventional recommendations from a unique perspective of the real-world implementation of AI ethics through explainable AI (XAI) techniques. We first describe the phenomenon (i.e., the "symptoms") of ineffective implementation of AI ethics in explainable AI using four empirical cases. From the "symptoms", we diagnose the root cause (i.e., the "disease") being the dysfunction and imbalance of power structures in the sociotechnical system of AI. The power structures are dominated by unjust and unchecked power that does not represent the benefits and interests of the public and the most impacted communities, and cannot be countervailed by ethical power. Based on the understanding of power mechanisms, we propose three interventional recommendations to tackle the root cause, including: 1) Making power explicable and checked, 2) Reframing the narratives and assumptions of AI and AI ethics to check unjust power and reflect the values and benefits of the public, and 3) Uniting the efforts of ethical and scientific conduct of AI to encode ethical values as technical standards, norms, and methods, including conducting critical examinations and limitation analyses of AI technical practices. We hope that our diagnosis and interventional recommendations can be a useful input to the AI community and civil society's ongoing discussion and implementation of ethics in AI for ethical and responsible AI practice.

Related papers

• AI as IA: The use and abuse of artificial intelligence (AI) for human enhancement through intellectual augmentation (IA) [45.88028371034407]
  This paper offers an overview of the prospects and ethics of using AI to achieve human enhancement.<n>We discuss potential ethical problems, namely inadequate performance, safety, coercion and manipulation, privacy, cognitive liberty, authenticity, and fairness.<n>We conclude that while there are very significant technical hurdles to real human enhancement through AI, and significant ethical problems, there are also significant benefits that may realistically be achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T09:39:11Z)
• A Capability Approach to AI Ethics [0.0]
  We show that conceptualizing AI ethics through the capability approach has two main advantages for AI ethics as a discipline.<n>First, it helps clarify the ethical dimension of AI tools.<n>Second, it provides guidance to implementing ethical considerations within the design of AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T12:08:21Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence [0.08192907805418582]
  This study attempts to identify the major ethical principles influencing the utility performance of AI at different technological levels. Justice, privacy, bias, lack of regulations, risks, and interpretability are the most important principles to consider for ethical AI. We propose a new utilitarian ethics-based theoretical framework for designing ethical AI for the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T02:10:58Z)
• Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challenges [11.656193349991609]
  We conducted a survey aimed at understanding AI practitioners' awareness of AI ethics and their challenges in incorporating ethics. Based on 100 AI practitioners' responses, our findings indicate that majority of AI practitioners had a reasonable familiarity with the concept of AI ethics. Formal education/training was considered somewhat helpful in preparing practitioners to incorporate AI ethics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T02:50:46Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers [8.82540441326446]
  Transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles. Lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are the most common AI ethics challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T17:24:29Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• AI virtues -- The missing link in putting AI ethics into practice [0.0]
  The paper defines four basic AI virtues, namely justice, honesty, responsibility and care. It defines two second-order AI virtues, prudence and fortitude, that bolster achieving the basic virtues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T14:14:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.