Resource-sensitive but language-blind: Community size and not grammatical complexity better predicts the accuracy of Large Language Models in a novel Wug Test

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12463v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:52:57 GMT
• Title: Resource-sensitive but language-blind: Community size and not grammatical complexity better predicts the accuracy of Large Language Models in a novel Wug Test
• Authors: Nikoleta Pantelidou, Evelina Leivada, Paolo Morosi,
• Abstract summary: The aim is to determine whether model accuracy approximates human competence.<n>The results show that the models are able to generalize morphological processes to unseen words with human-like accuracy.<n> languages with larger speaker communities and stronger digital representation, such as Spanish and English, revealed higher accuracy than less-resourced ones like Catalan and Greek.
• Score: 0.15293427903448023
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The linguistic abilities of Large Language Models are a matter of ongoing debate. This study contributes to this discussion by investigating model performance in a morphological generalization task that involves novel words. Using a multilingual adaptation of the Wug Test, six models were tested across four partially unrelated languages (Catalan, English, Greek, and Spanish) and compared with human speakers. The aim is to determine whether model accuracy approximates human competence and whether it is shaped primarily by linguistic complexity or by the quantity of available training data. Consistent with previous research, the results show that the models are able to generalize morphological processes to unseen words with human-like accuracy. However, accuracy patterns align more closely with community size and data availability than with structural complexity, refining earlier claims in the literature. In particular, languages with larger speaker communities and stronger digital representation, such as Spanish and English, revealed higher accuracy than less-resourced ones like Catalan and Greek. Overall, our findings suggest that model behavior is mainly driven by the richness of linguistic resources rather than by sensitivity to grammatical complexity, reflecting a form of performance that resembles human linguistic competence only superficially.

Related papers

• Do language models accommodate their users? A study of linguistic convergence [15.958711524171362]
  We find that models strongly converge to the conversation's style, often significantly overfitting relative to the human baseline.<n>We observe consistent shifts in convergence across modeling settings, with instruction-tuned and larger models converging less than their pretrained counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T09:55:40Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Multiword Expressions in Multilingual and Code-Switched Contexts [2.519319150166215]
  This study evaluates how state-of-the-art language models process the ambiguity of potentially idiomatic multiword expressions.<n>We find that large language models, despite their strengths, struggle with nuanced language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:39:28Z)
• The Role of Language Imbalance in Cross-lingual Generalisation: Insights from Cloned Language Experiments [57.273662221547056]
  In this study, we investigate an unintuitive novel driver of cross-lingual generalisation: language imbalance. We observe that the existence of a predominant language during training boosts the performance of less frequent languages. As we extend our analysis to real languages, we find that infrequent languages still benefit from frequent ones, yet whether language imbalance causes cross-lingual generalisation there is not conclusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T17:58:05Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks [92.64781370921486]
  We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:48:24Z)
• Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey [5.663056267168211]
  We discuss over 250 recent studies of English language model behavior before task-specific fine-tuning. Despite dramatic increases in generated text quality as models scale to hundreds of billions of parameters, the models are still prone to unfactual responses, commonsense errors, memorized text, and social biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T23:54:26Z)
• Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language Models [73.11488464916668]
  This study investigates the dynamics of the multilingual pretraining process. We probe checkpoints taken from throughout XLM-R pretraining, using a suite of linguistic tasks. Our analysis shows that the model achieves high in-language performance early on, with lower-level linguistic skills acquired before more complex ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T03:35:00Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Models [104.41668491794974]
  We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender. We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Evaluation of Word Prediction Models [25.39896327641704]
  We investigate how neural word prediction models' ability to learn syntax varies by language. CLAMS includes subject-verb agreement challenge sets for English, French, German, Hebrew and Russian. We use CLAMS to evaluate LSTM language models as well as monolingual and multilingual BERT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T02:51:20Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)
• An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Language-Independent Models [11.976665726887733]
  We show that language-independent models can be comparable to or even outperforms the models trained using monolingual data. We experiment language-independent models with many different languages and show that they are more suitable for typologically similar languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-30T22:41:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.