A theory-based AI automation exposure index: Applying Moravec's Paradox to the US labor market

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13369v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:00:33 GMT
• Title: A theory-based AI automation exposure index: Applying Moravec's Paradox to the US labor market
• Authors: Jacob Schaal,
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a theory-driven automation exposure index based on Moravec's Paradox.<n> scoring 19,000 O*NET tasks on performance variance, tacit knowledge, data abundance, and algorithmic gaps reveals that management, STEM, and sciences occupations show the highest exposure.<n>The positive relationship between wages and exposure challenges the notion of skill-biased technological change if AI substitutes for workers.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper develops a theory-driven automation exposure index based on Moravec's Paradox. Scoring 19,000 O*NET tasks on performance variance, tacit knowledge, data abundance, and algorithmic gaps reveals that management, STEM, and sciences occupations show the highest exposure. In contrast, maintenance, agriculture, and construction show the lowest. The positive relationship between wages and exposure challenges the notion of skill-biased technological change if AI substitutes for workers. At the same time, tacit knowledge exhibits a positive relationship with wages consistent with seniority-biased technological change. This index identifies fundamental automatability rather than current capabilities, while also validating the AI annotation method pioneered by Eloundou et al. (2024) with a correlation of 0.72. The non-positive relationship with pre-LLM indices suggests a paradigm shift in automation patterns.

Related papers

• The Algorithmic Barrier: Quantifying Artificial Frictional Unemployment in Automated Recruitment Systems [0.0]
  The U.S. labor market exhibits a persistent coexistence of high job vacancy rates and prolonged unemployment duration.<n>This paper argues that a non-trivial portion of contemporary frictional unemployment is artificially induced by automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T23:08:06Z)
• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work [46.53553410123801]
  AIs have made rapid progress on research-oriented benchmarks of knowledge and reasoning, but it remains unclear how these gains translate into economic value and automation.<n>To measure this, we introduce the Remote Labor Index (RLI), a broadly multi-sector benchmark comprising real-world, economically valuable projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T17:58:04Z)
• General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Power [57.7995945974989]
  benchmarking has guided progress in AI, but it has offered limited explanatory and predictive power for general-purpose AI systems.<n>We introduce general scales for AI evaluation that can explain what common AI benchmarks really measure.<n>Our fully-automated methodology builds on 18 newly-crafted rubrics that place instance demands on general scales that do not saturate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T01:13:56Z)
• Follow the money: a startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries and regions [0.0]
  Existing measures of AI occupational exposure focus on AI's theoretical potential to substitute or complement human labour on the basis of technical feasibility.<n>We introduce the AI Startup Exposure (AISE) index-a novel metric based on occupational descriptions from O*NET and AI applications developed by startups.<n>Our findings suggest that AI adoption will be gradual and shaped by social factors as much as by the technical feasibility of AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T10:25:05Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs requiring a graduate or postgraduate level of education.<n>Even in high-skill occupations, AI exhibits high variability in task substitution, suggesting that AI and humans complement each other within the same occupation.<n>All results, models, and code are freely available online to allow the community to reproduce our results, compare outcomes, and use our work as a benchmark to monitor AI's progress over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• The Clever Hans Mirage: A Comprehensive Survey on Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning [78.13481522957552]
  Machine learning models are sensitive to spurious correlations between non-essential features of the inputs and the corresponding labels.<n>This paper provides a comprehensive survey of this emerging issue, along with a fine-grained taxonomy of existing state-of-the-art methods for addressing spurious correlations in machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T04:49:34Z)
• Induction and Exploitation of Subgoal Automata for Reinforcement Learning [75.55324974788475]
  We present ISA, an approach for learning and exploiting subgoals in episodic reinforcement learning (RL) tasks. ISA interleaves reinforcement learning with the induction of a subgoal automaton, an automaton whose edges are labeled by the task's subgoals. A subgoal automaton also consists of two special states: a state indicating the successful completion of the task, and a state indicating that the task has finished without succeeding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T16:42:55Z)
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IT identity: Antecedents Identifying with AI Applications [0.76146285961466]
  replacing managers with AI systems may have a negative impact on workers outcomes. It is unclear if workers receive the same benefits from their relationships with AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T10:59:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.