The Algorithmic Barrier: Quantifying Artificial Frictional Unemployment in Automated Recruitment Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14534v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:08:06 GMT
• Title: The Algorithmic Barrier: Quantifying Artificial Frictional Unemployment in Automated Recruitment Systems
• Authors: Ibrahim Denis Fofanah,
• Abstract summary: The U.S. labor market exhibits a persistent coexistence of high job vacancy rates and prolonged unemployment duration.<n>This paper argues that a non-trivial portion of contemporary frictional unemployment is artificially induced by automated recruitment systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The United States labor market exhibits a persistent coexistence of high job vacancy rates and prolonged unemployment duration, a pattern that standard labor market theory struggles to explain. This paper argues that a non-trivial portion of contemporary frictional unemployment is artificially induced by automated recruitment systems that rely on deterministic keyword-based screening. Drawing on labor economics, information asymmetry theory, and prior work on algorithmic hiring, we formalize this phenomenon as artificial frictional unemployment arising from semantic misinterpretation of candidate competencies. We evaluate this claim using controlled simulations that compare legacy keyword-based screening with semantic matching based on high-dimensional vector representations of resumes and job descriptions. The results demonstrate substantial improvements in recall and overall matching efficiency without a corresponding loss in precision. Building on these findings, the paper proposes a candidate-side workforce operating architecture that standardizes, verifies, and semantically aligns human capital signals while remaining interoperable with existing recruitment infrastructure. The findings highlight the economic costs of outdated hiring systems and the potential gains from improving semantic alignment in labor market matching.

Related papers

• How Well Does Agent Development Reflect Real-World Work? [89.17217057358285]
  We study the relationship between agent development efforts and the distribution of real-world human work by mapping benchmark instances to work domains and skills.<n>We reveal substantial mismatches between agent development that tends to be programming-centric, and the categories in which human labor and economic value are concentrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T17:55:49Z)
• Quantifying Algorithmic Friction in Automated Resume Screening Systems [0.0]
  Keywords-based resume screening exhibits high levels of algorithmic friction.<n>Semantic representations substantially reduce false negative rejection without compromising precision.<n>This study provides an empirical basis for evaluating how recruitment system design affects matching efficiency in modern labor markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T23:49:03Z)
• A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators [56.949279542190084]
  We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T01:05:48Z)
• ERA-IT: Aligning Semantic Models with Revealed Economic Preference for Real-Time and Explainable Patent Valuation [0.0]
  This study proposes the Economic Reasoning Alignment via Instruction Tuning (ERA-IT) framework.<n>We theoretically conceptualize patent renewal history as a revealed economic preference and leverage it as an objective supervisory signal.<n>We trained the model not only to predict value tiers but also to reverse-engineer the Economic Chain-of-Thought from unstructured text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T23:04:07Z)
• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• RobotArena $\infty$: Scalable Robot Benchmarking via Real-to-Sim Translation [47.79800816696372]
  Real-world testing of manipulation policies is labor-intensive at scale, and difficult to reproduce.<n>Existing simulation benchmarks are similarly limited, as they train and test policies within the same synthetic domains.<n>In this paper, we introduce a new benchmarking framework that overcomes these challenges by shifting VLA evaluation into large-scale simulated augmented environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T17:41:38Z)
• How AI Forecasts AI Jobs: Benchmarking LLM Predictions of Labor Market Changes [5.848712585343904]
  This paper introduces a benchmark for evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) can anticipate changes in job demand.<n>Our benchmark combines two datasets: a high-frequency index of sector-level job postings in the United States, and a global dataset of projected occupational changes due to AI adoption.<n>Results show that structured task prompts consistently improve forecast stability, while persona prompts offer advantages on short-term trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T14:08:27Z)
• A theory-based AI automation exposure index: Applying Moravec's Paradox to the US labor market [0.0]
  This paper develops a theory-driven automation exposure index based on Moravec's Paradox.<n> scoring 19,000 O*NET tasks on performance variance, tacit knowledge, data abundance, and algorithmic gaps reveals that management, STEM, and sciences occupations show the highest exposure.<n>The positive relationship between wages and exposure challenges the notion of skill-biased technological change if AI substitutes for workers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T10:00:33Z)
• Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [51.85792055455284]
  Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks.<n>System 1 reasoning is computationally efficient but leads to suboptimal performance.<n>System 2 reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs due to its slow thinking nature and inefficient or unnecessary reasoning behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:58:07Z)
• "Generate" the Future of Work through AI: Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets [4.955822723273599]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based generative AI systems, such as ChatGPT, demonstrate zero-shot learning capabilities across a wide range of downstream tasks.<n>These systems are poised to reshape labor market dynamics.<n>However, predicting their precise impact is challenging, given AI's simultaneous effects on both demand and supply.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T19:45:00Z)
• An Uncertainty-based Human-in-the-loop System for Industrial Tool Wear Analysis [68.8204255655161]
  We show that uncertainty measures based on Monte-Carlo dropout in the context of a human-in-the-loop system increase the system's transparency and performance. A simulation study demonstrates that the uncertainty-based human-in-the-loop system increases performance for different levels of human involvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T15:47:37Z)
• Generating Fact Checking Explanations [52.879658637466605]
  A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T05:23:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.