Weight Weaving: Parameter Pooling for Data-Free Model Merging
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13921v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:52:42 GMT
- Title: Weight Weaving: Parameter Pooling for Data-Free Model Merging
- Authors: Levy Chaves, Eduardo Valle, Sandra Avila,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Weight Weaving, a plug-and-play technique that pools model weights across $lambda$ values search space.<n>Our method consistently improves the performance of several model merging methods, achieving average accuracy gains of up to 15.9 percentage points in a data-free setting.
- Score: 7.490016490735962
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Model merging provides a cost-effective and data-efficient combination of specialized deep neural networks through parameter integration. This technique leverages expert models across downstream tasks without requiring retraining. Most model merging approaches critically depend on scaling hyper-parameters $\lambda$, which weight each model's contribution globally or individually. Principled approaches for setting scaling factors without accessing any data (data-free) are scarce, often leading researchers to tune $\lambda$ using privileged data from the evaluation set, which is obviously unfeasible in practice. To address this limitation, we introduce Weight Weaving, a plug-and-play technique that pools model weights across $\lambda$ values search space using user-defined pooling functions, such as averaging, random selection, or even existing model merging methods. Our method demonstrates high modularity, imposing minimal constraints on the search space. It operates orthogonally to existing model merging methods and eliminates evaluation data requirements. We validate Weight Weaving across three ViT variants in three experimental setups: vision multi-task learning, vision continual learning, and domain generalization. Our method consistently improves the performance of several model merging methods, achieving average accuracy gains of up to 15.9 percentage points in a data-free setting.
Related papers
- PSO-Merging: Merging Models Based on Particle Swarm Optimization [36.641774346671504]
We introduce PSO-Merging, a novel data-driven merging method based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)<n>In this approach, we initialize the particle swarm with a pre-trained model, expert models, and sparsified expert models.<n>We then perform multiple iterations, with the final global best particle serving as the merged model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-27T12:52:36Z) - Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach [65.6966065843227]
Iterative Reweight-then-IRO is a framework that performs RL-style alignment of a frozen base model without touching its parameters.<n>At test time, the value functions are used to guide the base model generation via a search-based optimization process.<n> Notably, users can apply IRO to align a model on their own dataset, similar to OpenAI's reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-21T21:49:02Z) - Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models [80.42634994902858]
Large-scale pre-training has fundamentally changed how machine learning research is done today.<n>Applying this same framework to reinforcement learning is appealing because it offers compelling avenues for addressing core challenges in RL.<n>Recent advances in generative AI have provided new tools for modeling highly complex distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T15:27:46Z) - NAN: A Training-Free Solution to Coefficient Estimation in Model Merging [61.36020737229637]
We show that the optimal merging weights should scale with the amount of task-specific information encoded in each model.<n>We propose NAN, a simple yet effective method that estimates model merging coefficients via the inverse of parameter norm.<n>NAN is training-free, plug-and-play, and applicable to a wide range of merging strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T02:46:08Z) - RobustMerge: Parameter-Efficient Model Merging for MLLMs with Direction Robustness [28.437105789298244]
RobustMerge is a training-free parameter-efficient merging method with complementary parameter adaptation to maintain direction robustness.<n>We establish a benchmark consisting of diverse multimodal tasks, on which we conduct experiments to certify the outstanding performance and generalizability of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T13:52:05Z) - Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descent [72.10987117380584]
Merging multiple expert models offers a promising approach for performing multi-task learning without accessing their original data.<n>We find existing methods discard task-specific information that, while causing conflicts, is crucial for performance.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse architectures and tasks in both vision and NLP domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T12:45:21Z) - FineGates: LLMs Finetuning with Compression using Stochastic Gates [7.093692674858257]
Large Language Models (LLMs) present significant challenges for full finetuning due to the high computational demands.<n>Lightweight finetuning techniques have been proposed, like learning low-rank adapter layers.<n>We propose an adaptor model based on gates that simultaneously sparsify the frozen base model with task-specific adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T14:33:05Z) - Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectives [116.42095026960598]
Existing methods primarily focus on optimizing LMs for a single reward function, limiting their adaptability to varied objectives.
Here, we propose $textbfmulti-objective decoding (MOD)$, a decoding-time algorithm that outputs the next token from a linear combination of predictions.
We show why existing approaches can be sub-optimal even in natural settings and obtain optimality guarantees for our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T02:46:30Z) - TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models [95.59265307318752]
Transfer learning can confer significant advantages, including improved downstream performance, faster convergence, and better sample efficiency.
Model merging has emerged as a solution to combine multiple task-specific models into a single model without performing additional training.
Existing merging methods often ignore the interference between parameters of different models, resulting in large performance drops when merging multiple models.
We propose TIES-Merging, which introduces three novel steps when merging models: resetting parameters that only changed a small amount during fine-tuning, resolving sign conflicts, and merging only the parameters that are in alignment with the final agreed-upon sign.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T17:31:32Z) - Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [47.432215933099016]
Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models.<n>This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model.<n>We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z) - Learning the Stein Discrepancy for Training and Evaluating Energy-Based
Models without Sampling [30.406623987492726]
We present a new method for evaluating and training unnormalized density models.
We estimate the Stein discrepancy between the data density $p(x)$ and the model density $q(x)$ defined by a vector function of the data.
This yields a novel goodness-of-fit test which outperforms existing methods on high dimensional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-13T16:39:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.