Soundness-Aware Level: A Microscopic Signature that Predicts LLM Reasoning Potential

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15216v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 19:16:24 GMT
• Title: Soundness-Aware Level: A Microscopic Signature that Predicts LLM Reasoning Potential
• Authors: Xuansheng Wu, Xiaoman Pan, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can elicit strong reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our key discovery is that high-potential models are inherently soundness-aware.<n>We introduce the Soundness-Aware Level (SAL), a microscopic metric using the Jensen-Shannon Divergence to measure the separation between these distributions.
• Score: 27.552392596027588
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can elicit strong reasoning in large language models (LLMs), while their performance after RLVR varies dramatically across different base models. This raises a fundamental question: what microscopic property of pre-trained models leads to this variation? To investigate, we formalize reasoning as chains of Horn clauses ("if-then" rules) built from features extracted from the LLM's latent space via cross-layer sparse autoencoders (SAEs). We estimate the transition probabilities between its features, and further categorize each rule by its semantic soundness level (e.g., strict, plausible, noisy) with an LLM. Our key discovery is that high-potential models are inherently soundness-aware: their internal probability distributions systematically shift across rules' soundness levels, becoming highly distinct for "strict" versus "noisy" rules. In contrast, weaker models are soundness-agnostic, collapsing to one distribution regardless of soundness levels. To quantify this, we introduce the Soundness-Aware Level (SAL), a microscopic metric using the Jensen-Shannon Divergence to measure the separation between these distributions. We show that SAL's predictions of post-RLVR reasoning performance follow a precise empirical law (R^2=0.87) across diverse model families (Qwen, Mistral, Llama, DeepSeek) and scales (0.5B-14B). This reveals that a model's reasoning potential is tied to its intrinsic, pre-trained ability to distinguish sound knowledge from unsound ones. These findings underscore the critical role of model pre-training in shaping reasoning and offer a practical metric grounded in the model's internal mechanisms for selecting/designing stronger base models.

Related papers

• How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns [51.02752099869218]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display strikingly different generalization behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel benchmark that decomposes reasoning into atomic core skills.<n>We show that RL-tuned models maintain more stable behavioral profiles and resist collapse in reasoning skills, whereas SFT models exhibit sharper drift and overfit to surface patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T08:16:20Z)
• LENS: Learning Ensemble Confidence from Neural States for Multi-LLM Answer Integration [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across various tasks.<n>We propose LENS (Learning ENsemble confidence from Neural States), a novel approach that learns to estimate model confidence by analyzing internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T00:35:45Z)
• FairReason: Balancing Reasoning and Social Bias in MLLMs [54.26091556079722]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) already achieve state-of-the-art results across a wide range of tasks and modalities.<n>Recent studies explore advanced prompting schemes and post-training fine-tuning to push their reasoning ability further.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T19:57:22Z)
• Simple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification [9.397157329808254]
  MUSE is a simple information-theoretic method to identify and aggregate well-calibrated subsets of large language models.<n> Experiments on binary prediction tasks demonstrate improved calibration and predictive performance compared to single-model and na"ive ensemble baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T19:13:25Z)
• Factual Self-Awareness in Language Models: Representation, Robustness, and Scaling [56.26834106704781]
  Factual incorrectness in generated content is one of the primary concerns in ubiquitous deployment of large language models (LLMs)<n>We provide evidence supporting the presence of LLMs' internal compass that dictate the correctness of factual recall at the time of generation.<n>Scaling experiments across model sizes and training dynamics highlight that self-awareness emerges rapidly during training and peaks in intermediate layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T16:24:02Z)
• Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model? [66.61292196146016]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently demonstrated notable success in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>This study critically examines the current state of RLVR.<n>We find that the current training setup does not elicit fundamentally new reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T17:59:56Z)
• Do Theory of Mind Benchmarks Need Explicit Human-like Reasoning in Language Models? [14.29992535286614]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to attribute mental states to others.<n>Recent advancements in Large Language Models have shown promising performance on ToM benchmarks.<n>Do these benchmarks necessitate explicit human-like reasoning processes, or can models succeed through alternative strategies?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T12:58:42Z)
• Spatial Reasoning with Denoising Models [49.83744014336816]
  We introduce a framework to perform reasoning over sets of continuous variables via denoising generative models.<n>For the first time, that order of generation can successfully be predicted by the denoising network itself.<n>Using these findings, we can increase the accuracy of specific reasoning tasks from 1% to >50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:08:30Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.