A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search: Foundations, Roles, Optimizations, Evaluations, and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16724v2
• Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:23:17 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search: Foundations, Roles, Optimizations, Evaluations, and Applications
• Authors: Minhua Lin, Zongyu Wu, Zhichao Xu, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang, Qi He, Charu Aggarwal, Hui Liu, Xiang Zhang, Suhang Wang,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates issues by grounding model outputs in external evidence.<n>Recent advances in agentic search address these limitations by enabling LLMs to plan, retrieve, and reflect through multi-step interaction with search environments.<n>Within this paradigm, reinforcement learning (RL) offers a powerful mechanism for adaptive and self-improving search behavior.
• Score: 41.610769640632334
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The advent of large language models (LLMs) has transformed information access and reasoning through open-ended natural language interaction. However, LLMs remain limited by static knowledge, factual hallucinations, and the inability to retrieve real-time or domain-specific information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these issues by grounding model outputs in external evidence, but traditional RAG pipelines are often single turn and heuristic, lacking adaptive control over retrieval and reasoning. Recent advances in agentic search address these limitations by enabling LLMs to plan, retrieve, and reflect through multi-step interaction with search environments. Within this paradigm, reinforcement learning (RL) offers a powerful mechanism for adaptive and self-improving search behavior. This survey provides the first comprehensive overview of \emph{RL-based agentic search}, organizing the emerging field along three complementary dimensions: (i) What RL is for (functional roles), (ii) How RL is used (optimization strategies), and (iii) Where RL is applied (scope of optimization). We summarize representative methods, evaluation protocols, and applications, and discuss open challenges and future directions toward building reliable and scalable RL driven agentic search systems. We hope this survey will inspire future research on the integration of RL and agentic search. Our repository is available at https://github.com/ventr1c/Awesome-RL-based-Agentic-Search-Papers.

Related papers

• QAgent: A modular Search Agent with Interactive Query Understanding [25.147900132089777]
  Large language models excel at natural language tasks but are limited by their static parametric knowledge.<n>We propose a unified agentic RAG framework that employs a search agent for adaptive retrieval.<n> Experiments show QAgent excels at QA and serves as a plug-and-play module for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T16:08:05Z)
• Beneficial Reasoning Behaviors in Agentic Search and Effective Post-training to Obtain Them [23.986035712600657]
  We propose a reasoning-driven pipeline to study effective reasoning behavior patterns in agentic search.<n>We identify four beneficial reasoning behaviors: Information Verification, Authority Evaluation, Adaptive Search, and Error Recovery.<n>We show that behavior priming yields over 35% gains in Llama3.2-3B and Qwen3-1.7B compared to directly training agentic search models with RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T00:20:35Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
  This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z)
• An Empirical Study on Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning-Search Interleaved LLM Agents [34.25887147052966]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated strong potential in training large language models (LLMs) capable of complex reasoning for real-world problem solving.<n>More recently, RL has been leveraged to create sophisticated LLM-based search agents that adeptly combine reasoning with search engine use.<n>Key factors -- such as (1) reward formulation, (2) the choice and characteristics of the underlying LLM, and (3) the role of the search engine in the RL process -- require further investigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T05:09:43Z)
• ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching [69.55482019211597]
  We introduce ZeroSearch, a framework that incentivizes the capabilities of large language models to use a real search engine with simulated searches during training.<n>Our approach begins with lightweight supervised fine-tuning to transform the LLM into a retrieval module capable of generating both useful and noisy documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T17:30:22Z)
• R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
  textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Challenges [51.699348215510575]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a popular machine learning paradigm where intelligent agents interact with the environment to fulfill a long-term goal.<n>Despite the encouraging results achieved, the deep neural network-based backbone is widely deemed as a black box that impedes practitioners to trust and employ trained agents in realistic scenarios where high security and reliability are essential.<n>To alleviate this issue, a large volume of literature devoted to shedding light on the inner workings of the intelligent agents has been proposed, by constructing intrinsic interpretability or post-hoc explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T13:52:06Z)
• A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Dynamically Varying Environments [1.713291434132985]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms find applications in inventory control, recommender systems, vehicular traffic management, cloud computing and robotics. Real-world complications of many tasks arising in these domains makes them difficult to solve with the basic assumptions underlying classical RL algorithms. This paper provides a survey of RL methods developed for handling dynamically varying environment models. A representative collection of these algorithms is discussed in detail in this work along with their categorization and their relative merits and demerits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T09:42:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.