Investigating Demographic Bias in Brain MRI Segmentation: A Comparative Study of Deep-Learning and Non-Deep-Learning Methods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17999v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:25:38 GMT
• Title: Investigating Demographic Bias in Brain MRI Segmentation: A Comparative Study of Deep-Learning and Non-Deep-Learning Methods
• Authors: Ghazal Danaee, Marc Niethammer, Jarrett Rushmore, Sylvain Bouix,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the results of three different segmentation models (UNesT, nnU-Net, and CoTr) and a traditional atlas-based method (ANTs)<n>We utilize a dataset including four demographic subgroups: black female, black male, white female, and white male.<n>We examine sex and race effects on the volume of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) using segmentations from the manual rater and from our biased models.
• Score: 11.161101835644667
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep-learning-based segmentation algorithms have substantially advanced the field of medical image analysis, particularly in structural delineations in MRIs. However, an important consideration is the intrinsic bias in the data. Concerns about unfairness, such as performance disparities based on sensitive attributes like race and sex, are increasingly urgent. In this work, we evaluate the results of three different segmentation models (UNesT, nnU-Net, and CoTr) and a traditional atlas-based method (ANTs), applied to segment the left and right nucleus accumbens (NAc) in MRI images. We utilize a dataset including four demographic subgroups: black female, black male, white female, and white male. We employ manually labeled gold-standard segmentations to train and test segmentation models. This study consists of two parts: the first assesses the segmentation performance of models, while the second measures the volumes they produce to evaluate the effects of race, sex, and their interaction. Fairness is quantitatively measured using a metric designed to quantify fairness in segmentation performance. Additionally, linear mixed models analyze the impact of demographic variables on segmentation accuracy and derived volumes. Training on the same race as the test subjects leads to significantly better segmentation accuracy for some models. ANTs and UNesT show notable improvements in segmentation accuracy when trained and tested on race-matched data, unlike nnU-Net, which demonstrates robust performance independent of demographic matching. Finally, we examine sex and race effects on the volume of the NAc using segmentations from the manual rater and from our biased models. Results reveal that the sex effects observed with manual segmentation can also be observed with biased models, whereas the race effects disappear in all but one model.

Related papers

• How far can bias go? -- Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment [54.51310112013655]
  This study examines the correlation between gender-occupation bias in pre-training data and their manifestation in LLMs.<n>Our findings reveal that biases present in pre-training data are amplified in model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T16:20:25Z)
• Dataset Distribution Impacts Model Fairness: Single vs. Multi-Task Learning [2.9530211066840417]
  We evaluate the performance of skin lesion classification using ResNet-based CNNs.<n>We present a linear programming method for generating datasets with varying patient sex and class labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T15:23:26Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Fairness of Foundation Models for Multi-Organ Image Segmentation [15.377701636336784]
  We prospectively curate a benchmark dataset of 3D MRI and CT scans of the organs including liver, kidney, spleen, lung and aorta. We document demographic details such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) for each subject to facilitate a nuanced fairness analysis. Our comprehensive analysis, which accounts for various confounding factors, reveals significant fairness concerns within these foundational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:14:04Z)
• The Impact of Debiasing on the Performance of Language Models in Downstream Tasks is Underestimated [70.23064111640132]
  We compare the impact of debiasing on performance across multiple downstream tasks using a wide-range of benchmark datasets. Experiments show that the effects of debiasing are consistently emphunderestimated across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T20:25:34Z)
• An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentation [8.449342469976758]
  We investigate how imbalances in subject sex and race affect AI-based cine cardiac magnetic resonance image segmentation. We find significant sex bias in three of the four models and racial bias in all of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T14:55:38Z)
• Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
  We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z)
• Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics [80.07271410743806]
  We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness. We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks. Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation with Extremely Limited Labels [54.58539616385138]
  We introduce a novel semi-supervised 2D medical image segmentation framework termed Mine yOur owN Anatomy (MONA) First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the model training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T15:50:31Z)
• A systematic study of race and sex bias in CNN-based cardiac MR segmentation [6.507372382471608]
  We present the first systematic study of the impact of training set imbalance on race and sex bias in CNN-based segmentation. We focus on segmentation of the structures of the heart from short axis cine cardiac magnetic resonance images, and train multiple CNN segmentation models with different levels of race/sex imbalance. We find no significant bias in the sex experiment but significant bias in two separate race experiments, highlighting the need to consider adequate representation of different demographic groups in health datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T14:32:00Z)
• Fairness in Cardiac MR Image Analysis: An Investigation of Bias Due to Data Imbalance in Deep Learning Based Segmentation [1.6386696247541932]
  "Fairness" in AI refers to assessing algorithms for potential bias based on demographic characteristics such as race and gender. Deep learning (DL) in cardiac MR segmentation has led to impressive results in recent years, but no work has yet investigated the fairness of such models. We find statistically significant differences in Dice performance between different racial groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T13:27:35Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.