An Empirical Study on the Fairness of Foundation Models for Multi-Organ Image Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12646v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:14:04 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study on the Fairness of Foundation Models for Multi-Organ Image Segmentation
• Authors: Qin Li, Yizhe Zhang, Yan Li, Jun Lyu, Meng Liu, Longyu Sun, Mengting Sun, Qirong Li, Wenyue Mao, Xinran Wu, Yajing Zhang, Yinghua Chu, Shuo Wang, Chengyan Wang,
• Abstract summary: We prospectively curate a benchmark dataset of 3D MRI and CT scans of the organs including liver, kidney, spleen, lung and aorta. We document demographic details such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) for each subject to facilitate a nuanced fairness analysis. Our comprehensive analysis, which accounts for various confounding factors, reveals significant fairness concerns within these foundational models.
• Score: 15.377701636336784
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The segmentation foundation model, e.g., Segment Anything Model (SAM), has attracted increasing interest in the medical image community. Early pioneering studies primarily concentrated on assessing and improving SAM's performance from the perspectives of overall accuracy and efficiency, yet little attention was given to the fairness considerations. This oversight raises questions about the potential for performance biases that could mirror those found in task-specific deep learning models like nnU-Net. In this paper, we explored the fairness dilemma concerning large segmentation foundation models. We prospectively curate a benchmark dataset of 3D MRI and CT scans of the organs including liver, kidney, spleen, lung and aorta from a total of 1056 healthy subjects with expert segmentations. Crucially, we document demographic details such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) for each subject to facilitate a nuanced fairness analysis. We test state-of-the-art foundation models for medical image segmentation, including the original SAM, medical SAM and SAT models, to evaluate segmentation efficacy across different demographic groups and identify disparities. Our comprehensive analysis, which accounts for various confounding factors, reveals significant fairness concerns within these foundational models. Moreover, our findings highlight not only disparities in overall segmentation metrics, such as the Dice Similarity Coefficient but also significant variations in the spatial distribution of segmentation errors, offering empirical evidence of the nuanced challenges in ensuring fairness in medical image segmentation.

Related papers

• QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge [93.61262892578067]
  Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, presents a significant challenge. This variability directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T17:57:24Z)
• FairSeg: A Large-Scale Medical Image Segmentation Dataset for Fairness Learning Using Segment Anything Model with Fair Error-Bound Scaling [14.483954095650887]
  High-quality medical fairness datasets are needed to promote fairness learning research. Existing medical fairness datasets are all for classification tasks, and no fairness datasets are available for medical segmentation. We propose the first fairness dataset for medical segmentation named HarvardFairSeg with 10,000 subject samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T18:44:21Z)
• Multi-task Explainable Skin Lesion Classification [54.76511683427566]
  We propose a few-shot-based approach for skin lesions that generalizes well with few labelled data. The proposed approach comprises a fusion of a segmentation network that acts as an attention module and classification network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T05:49:47Z)
• Learnable Weight Initialization for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation [66.3030435676252]
  We propose a learnable weight-based hybrid medical image segmentation approach. Our approach is easy to integrate into any hybrid model and requires no external training data. Experiments on multi-organ and lung cancer segmentation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:55:05Z)
• SAM on Medical Images: A Comprehensive Study on Three Prompt Modes [12.42280534113305]
  The Segment Anything Model (SAM) made an eye-catching debut recently and inspired many researchers to explore its potential and limitation in terms of zero-shot generalization capability. In this paper, we evaluate whether SAM has the potential to become the foundation model for medical image segmentation tasks. We also explore what kind of prompt can lead to the best zero-shot performance with different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T18:18:07Z)
• Generalist Vision Foundation Models for Medical Imaging: A Case Study of Segment Anything Model on Zero-Shot Medical Segmentation [5.547422331445511]
  We report quantitative and qualitative zero-shot segmentation results on nine medical image segmentation benchmarks. Our study indicates the versatility of generalist vision foundation models on medical imaging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T08:07:59Z)
• SAM.MD: Zero-shot medical image segmentation capabilities of the Segment Anything Model [1.1221592576472588]
  We evaluate the zero-shot capabilities of the Segment Anything Model for medical image segmentation. We show that SAM generalizes well to CT data, making it a potential catalyst for the advancement of semi-automatic segmentation tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T18:20:29Z)
• Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation using Diffusion Models [60.378180265885945]
  We introduce a single diffusion model-based approach that produces multiple plausible outputs by learning a distribution over group insights. Our proposed model generates a distribution of segmentation masks by leveraging the inherent sampling process of diffusion. Comprehensive results show that our proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art ambiguous segmentation networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:58:22Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation with Extremely Limited Labels [20.390832929798577]
  We introduce a novel semi-supervised medical image segmentation framework termed Mine yOur owN Anatomy (MONA) First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the model training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T15:50:31Z)
• Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation using a Global Correlation Network with Discriminative Embedding [60.89561661441736]
  We propose a novel method for few-shot medical image segmentation. We construct our few-shot image segmentor using a deep convolutional network trained episodically. We enhance discriminability of deep embedding to encourage clustering of the feature domains of the same class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T04:01:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.