Refugees of the Digital Space: Platform Migration from TikTok to RedNote
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18894v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:00:13 GMT
- Title: Refugees of the Digital Space: Platform Migration from TikTok to RedNote
- Authors: Ziyue Feng, Tianjia Dong, Zheya Lei,
- Abstract summary: U.S. government enacted a nationwide ban on TikTok, prompting a wave of American users to migrate to alternative platforms.<n>This paper examines how these digital migrants navigate cross-cultural platform environments.
- Score: 2.328849215741724
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In January 2025, the U.S. government enacted a nationwide ban on TikTok, prompting a wave of American users -- self-identified as ``TikTok Refugees'' -- to migrate to alternative platforms, particularly the Chinese social media app RedNote (Xiaohongshu). This paper examines how these digital migrants navigate cross-cultural platform environments and develop adaptive communicative strategies under algorithmic governance. Drawing on a multi-method framework, the study analyzes temporal posting patterns, influence dynamics, thematic preferences, and sentiment-weighted topic expressions across three distinct migration phases: Pre-Ban, Refugee Surge, and Stabilization. An entropy-weighted influence score was used to classify users into high- and low-influence groups, enabling comparative analysis of content strategies. Findings reveal that while dominant topics remained relatively stable over time (e.g., self-expression, lifestyle, and creativity), high-influence users were more likely to engage in culturally resonant or commercially strategic content. Additionally, political discourse was not avoided, but selectively activated as a point of transnational engagement. Emotionally, high-influence users tended to express more positive affect in culturally connective topics, while low-influence users showed stronger emotional intensity in personal narratives. These findings suggest that cross-cultural platform migration is shaped not only by structural affordances but also by users' differential capacities to adapt, perform, and maintain visibility. The study contributes to literature on platform society, affective publics, and user agency in transnational digital environments.
Related papers
- Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z) - Rejection or Inclusion in the Emotion-Identity Dynamics of TikTok Refugees on RedNote [20.87350224458745]
This study examines cross-cultural interactions between Chinese users and self-identified "TikTok Refugees"<n>Based on a dataset of 1,862 posts and 403,054 comments, we use large language model-based sentiment classification and BERT-based topic modelling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-19T13:38:33Z) - Discipline and Resistance: The Construction of a Digital Home for TikTok Refugees on Xiaohongshu [0.7499722271664147]
This study examines how TikTok refugees moved to Xiaohongshu after TikTok was about to be banned in the United States.<n>It utilizes Foucault's idea of heterotopia to demonstrate how Xiaohongshu became a crisis space for cross-cultural discussions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-19T03:47:55Z) - Pragmatic Disengagement and Culturally Situated Non Use Older Korean Immigrants Strategies for Navigating Digital Noise [1.9567015559455132]
This study examines how older Korean immigrants in the greater NYC area selectively engage with digital tools such as smartphones, YouTube, and AI platforms.<n>Using a community-based participatory research framework and 22 semi-structured interviews, we identify two key practices: pragmatic disengagement and interdependent navigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T19:32:25Z) - Ideological Fragmentation of the Social Media Ecosystem: From echo chambers to echo platforms [39.58317527488534]
We analyze 117 million posts related to the 2020 US Presidential elections from nine social media platforms.<n>Our findings reveal significant differences among platforms in their centrality within the ecosystem.<n>These results highlight the key dimensions shaping the fragmentation and polarization of the social media landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T18:45:03Z) - On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models.
Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z) - Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z) - Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social
Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems.
This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z) - MigrationsKB: A Knowledge Base of Public Attitudes towards Migrations
and their Driving Factors [1.6973426830397942]
This study is the analysis of social media platform to quantify public attitudes towards migrations.
The tweets spanning from 2013 to Jul-2021 in the European countries which are hosts to immigrants are collected.
The external databases are used to identify the potential social and economic factors causing negative attitudes of the people about migration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-17T12:50:39Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.